Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests

Q3 Environmental Science
P. Peri, Y. M. Rosas, D. López, María Vanessa Lencinas, Laura Cavallero, G. M. Martínez Pastur
{"title":"Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests","authors":"P. Peri, Y. M. Rosas, D. López, María Vanessa Lencinas, Laura Cavallero, G. M. Martínez Pastur","doi":"10.25260/ea.22.32.2.1.1872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A�������. Most of the native forests in Argentina are used for livestock production with li�le sustainable silvopastoral management. Our objective here is to discuss different management strategies where natural and human capital are combined to co-produce ecosystem services (ES) provided by silvopastoral systems in native forests, interacting with different ecosystem functions and biodiversity. Also, we provide perspectives that should be analyzed in a context of socio-ecological approaches in agro-forestry landscapes. Four types of theoretical strategies are proposed (win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose), which define the social-ecological and economic thresholds that determine the provision of ES and biodiversity in the long term. The evidence of the win-lose strategy occurs when the silvopastoral systems are managed mainly to increase economic profitability through increments in forage biomass aimed to increase livestock production in the medium and long term. Deferred deforestation was presented as a typical example of lose-lose strategy in the Chaco region based on short-term management strategies by only obtaining commodities (crops or livestock products) without considering the negative interactions with other ES and loss of biodiversity. The information provided in this work should assist stakeholders and researchers to identify thresholds of economic profitability and ecological resilience in ecosystems under management. The proposed approaches provide a utilitarian vision of ecosystem services and key aspects of social-ecological resilience.","PeriodicalId":53684,"journal":{"name":"Ecologia Austral","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologia Austral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25260/ea.22.32.2.1.1872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A�������. Most of the native forests in Argentina are used for livestock production with li�le sustainable silvopastoral management. Our objective here is to discuss different management strategies where natural and human capital are combined to co-produce ecosystem services (ES) provided by silvopastoral systems in native forests, interacting with different ecosystem functions and biodiversity. Also, we provide perspectives that should be analyzed in a context of socio-ecological approaches in agro-forestry landscapes. Four types of theoretical strategies are proposed (win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose), which define the social-ecological and economic thresholds that determine the provision of ES and biodiversity in the long term. The evidence of the win-lose strategy occurs when the silvopastoral systems are managed mainly to increase economic profitability through increments in forage biomass aimed to increase livestock production in the medium and long term. Deferred deforestation was presented as a typical example of lose-lose strategy in the Chaco region based on short-term management strategies by only obtaining commodities (crops or livestock products) without considering the negative interactions with other ES and loss of biodiversity. The information provided in this work should assist stakeholders and researchers to identify thresholds of economic profitability and ecological resilience in ecosystems under management. The proposed approaches provide a utilitarian vision of ecosystem services and key aspects of social-ecological resilience.
定义原生林中森林放牧系统管理战略的概念框架
A.�������. 阿根廷的大部分原生森林都用于畜牧业�可持续森林畜牧业管理。我们在这里的目标是讨论不同的管理策略,将自然资本和人力资本结合起来,共同生产由原生森林中的森林畜牧系统提供的生态系统服务,与不同的生态系统功能和生物多样性相互作用。此外,我们还提供了应在农林景观的社会生态方法背景下进行分析的观点。提出了四种类型的理论策略(双赢、输赢、输赢和输赢),定义了决定长期提供ES和生物多样性的社会生态和经济阈值。当森林畜牧系统主要通过增加饲料生物量来提高经济盈利能力,以期在中长期内提高牲畜产量时,就会出现双赢策略的证据。延迟砍伐森林是查科地区基于短期管理战略的双输战略的一个典型例子,只获得商品(作物或畜产品),而不考虑与其他生态系统的负面互动和生物多样性的丧失。这项工作中提供的信息应有助于利益攸关方和研究人员确定所管理生态系统的经济盈利能力和生态恢复能力的阈值。所提出的方法为生态系统服务和社会生态恢复力的关键方面提供了一个实用的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecologia Austral
Ecologia Austral Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecología Austral is the scientific journal published by the Ecological Society of Argentina, that is distributed for free among regular members. It publishes original scientific articles in any branch of the environmental sciences. The articles, in Spanish, English or Portuguese, can be results of original and unpublished scientific research, reviews and updates that summarize the current state of the art on a certain subject, points of view on theory and/or methods in ecology, and teaching aids to be used as supporting reading for students. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by two experts and the revision process is completed within three months after submission and published between two and six month after final acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信