Timber origin verification using mass spectrometry: Challenges, opportunities, and way forward

V. Deklerck
{"title":"Timber origin verification using mass spectrometry: Challenges, opportunities, and way forward","authors":"V. Deklerck","doi":"10.1016/j.fsiae.2022.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To fight the illegal timber trade, there is an increasing need to accurately verify or determine the harvest origin of timber. Next to genetic methods, mass spectrometry is being pushed forward as a possible tool towards this problem, especially via stable isotope ratio analysis (SIRA) and direct analysis in real time – time of flight mass spectrometry (DART-TOFMS). However, there are key scientific questions that need to be answered before these techniques can be scaled up and routinely and robustly applied. For SIRA, we need to understand better the effects of single ring versus ring pooling, cellulose versus whole wood and species or site differences. For DART-TOFMS, we need to investigate what drives the differences in metabolomic fingerprint between locations, and how much of that difference can be attributed to environmental or genetic effects, especially if we want to advance the use of DART-TOFMS for timber origin questions. In this paper, the important difference between origin verification and determination is discussed, a review of the state of the art is provided and a way forward and experimental design is presented to tackle these scientific questions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937422000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To fight the illegal timber trade, there is an increasing need to accurately verify or determine the harvest origin of timber. Next to genetic methods, mass spectrometry is being pushed forward as a possible tool towards this problem, especially via stable isotope ratio analysis (SIRA) and direct analysis in real time – time of flight mass spectrometry (DART-TOFMS). However, there are key scientific questions that need to be answered before these techniques can be scaled up and routinely and robustly applied. For SIRA, we need to understand better the effects of single ring versus ring pooling, cellulose versus whole wood and species or site differences. For DART-TOFMS, we need to investigate what drives the differences in metabolomic fingerprint between locations, and how much of that difference can be attributed to environmental or genetic effects, especially if we want to advance the use of DART-TOFMS for timber origin questions. In this paper, the important difference between origin verification and determination is discussed, a review of the state of the art is provided and a way forward and experimental design is presented to tackle these scientific questions.

使用质谱法进行木材原产地核查:挑战、机遇和前进方向
为了打击非法木材贸易,越来越需要准确核实或确定木材的采伐来源。继遗传方法之后,质谱法正被推动成为解决这一问题的可能工具,特别是通过稳定同位素比分析(SIRA)和实时飞行质谱法(DART-TOFMS)的直接分析。然而,在这些技术可以扩大规模并常规和可靠地应用之前,有一些关键的科学问题需要回答。对于SIRA,我们需要更好地了解单环与环池、纤维素与全木以及物种或地点差异的影响。对于DART-TOFMS,我们需要研究是什么驱动了不同地点之间代谢组学指纹的差异,以及这种差异有多少可以归因于环境或遗传影响,特别是如果我们想要推进DART-TOFMS在木材来源问题上的使用。本文讨论了起源验证和确定之间的重要区别,综述了目前的研究现状,并提出了解决这些科学问题的方法和实验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international. Animals and environments
Forensic science international. Animals and environments Pollution, Law, Forensic Medicine, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
142 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信