Comparison of the quality of the result of digitising panoramic analogue films using transmission and reflection scanner mode with direct digital imaging standard

A. Azhari, G. Gianto, S. Suprijanto
{"title":"Comparison of the quality of the result of digitising panoramic analogue films using transmission and reflection scanner mode with direct digital imaging standard","authors":"A. Azhari, G. Gianto, S. Suprijanto","doi":"10.24198/pjd.vol31no2.21155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The use of panoramic x-ray radiographs with analogue film negatives is still widely used. Contrast differences in the radiograph are determined by the level of light transmitted from the viewer to the film negative and visual perception of the radiologist, which can cause differences and errors of interpretation. This study was aimed to compare the quality of scanners produced by the transmission and reflection modes objectively with direct digital imaging standard. Methods: This study used a descriptive comparative design with purposive sampling method. Radiographic analysis was conducted towards 30 analogue radiographs of Radiology laboratory of Universitas Padjadjaran Dental Hospital. Digitisation was performed using a scanner with setting modes (reflection and transmission, 8-bit intensity resolution and spatial resolution of 800 dpi). Digitising the negative radiographs of analogue films into digital radiographs will get a range of percentage pixels. Histogram of radiographs with a percentage of pixels in the grey level range 0 - 64 exceeds 50%, including \"under-exposed\", in the grey level range 192 - 255 exceeding 50%, including \"over-exposed\". The evaluation was carried out to observe the radiograph exposure homogeneity by dividing the radiograph into 4 parts. Each part was calculated as the mean pixel value; then the standard deviation was searched for the four mean values (STDMI - standard deviation mean intensity) determined the homogeneity. Results: Digitising type of radiograph reflection was included under-exposed because the percentage of pixels in the grey level range 0 - 64 was 86.94%. STDMI consecutive reflection = 8.03, transmission = 18.05, direct digital imaging = 20.86. Conclusion: Digitisation with scanner transmission mode is the best result objectively because it approaches the quality value of direct digital imaging standard.Keywords: Objective quality, homogeneity, reflection, transmission","PeriodicalId":31757,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol31no2.21155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of panoramic x-ray radiographs with analogue film negatives is still widely used. Contrast differences in the radiograph are determined by the level of light transmitted from the viewer to the film negative and visual perception of the radiologist, which can cause differences and errors of interpretation. This study was aimed to compare the quality of scanners produced by the transmission and reflection modes objectively with direct digital imaging standard. Methods: This study used a descriptive comparative design with purposive sampling method. Radiographic analysis was conducted towards 30 analogue radiographs of Radiology laboratory of Universitas Padjadjaran Dental Hospital. Digitisation was performed using a scanner with setting modes (reflection and transmission, 8-bit intensity resolution and spatial resolution of 800 dpi). Digitising the negative radiographs of analogue films into digital radiographs will get a range of percentage pixels. Histogram of radiographs with a percentage of pixels in the grey level range 0 - 64 exceeds 50%, including "under-exposed", in the grey level range 192 - 255 exceeding 50%, including "over-exposed". The evaluation was carried out to observe the radiograph exposure homogeneity by dividing the radiograph into 4 parts. Each part was calculated as the mean pixel value; then the standard deviation was searched for the four mean values (STDMI - standard deviation mean intensity) determined the homogeneity. Results: Digitising type of radiograph reflection was included under-exposed because the percentage of pixels in the grey level range 0 - 64 was 86.94%. STDMI consecutive reflection = 8.03, transmission = 18.05, direct digital imaging = 20.86. Conclusion: Digitisation with scanner transmission mode is the best result objectively because it approaches the quality value of direct digital imaging standard.Keywords: Objective quality, homogeneity, reflection, transmission
采用透射和反射扫描方式与直接数字成像标准对全景模拟胶片进行数字化处理的结果质量比较
简介:全景x射线照片与模拟胶片底片的使用仍然广泛。射线照片中的对比度差异由从观察者透射到底片的光的水平和放射科医生的视觉感知决定,这可能会导致差异和解释错误。本研究旨在将透射和反射模式产生的扫描仪的质量与直接数字成像标准进行客观比较。方法:采用描述性比较设计和目的性抽样方法。对Padjadjaran大学牙科医院放射科实验室的30张模拟射线照片进行了射线照相分析。使用具有设置模式(反射和透射、8位强度分辨率和800dpi的空间分辨率)的扫描仪进行数字化。将模拟胶片的底片数字化为数字底片将获得一定范围的像素百分比。灰度级在0-64范围内的像素百分比超过50%的射线照片直方图,包括“曝光不足”,灰度级在192-255范围内的直方图超过50%,包括“过度曝光”。通过将射线照片分成4个部分来进行评估以观察射线照片曝光的均匀性。将每个部分计算为平均像素值;然后搜索标准差的四个平均值(STDMI-标准差平均强度),确定均匀性。结果:数字化类型的射线照片反射包括曝光不足,因为0-64灰度范围内的像素百分比为86.94%。STDMI连续反射=8.03,透射=18.05,直接数字成像=20.86。结论:扫描传输方式数字化是客观上最好的结果,因为它接近直接数字成像标准的质量值。关键词:客观质量、同质性、反射性、透射性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信