Social Media Fatigue and Privacy: An Exploration of Antecedents to Consumers’ Concerns regarding the Security of Their Personal Information on Social Media Platforms

IF 10.2 Q1 Social Sciences
L. Bright, Kelty Logan, H. Lim
{"title":"Social Media Fatigue and Privacy: An Exploration of Antecedents to Consumers’ Concerns regarding the Security of Their Personal Information on Social Media Platforms","authors":"L. Bright, Kelty Logan, H. Lim","doi":"10.1080/15252019.2022.2051097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined U.S. Facebook users’ privacy concerns and how those concerns, the Facebook users’ perceived abilities to protect their privacy on social media, their perceptions and intentions regarding social media advertising, and their prior experience with data breaches affected their likelihood of experiencing social media fatigue. While previous research has identified general privacy concerns as a contributing factor to social media fatigue, this study proposed that privacy concerns mediate the effect of the other, identified variables to predict social media fatigue, thus contributing to the existing literature by conceptually integrating privacy calculus theory (PCT) and privacy protection motivation theory (PPMT) into a model that demonstrates the pivotal role of privacy concerns as a predictor of social media fatigue. The results indicated that, regarding consumer engagement with social media advertising, the conceptualization of the privacy paradox should not be limited to an assessment of perceived risks and benefits; it should also include users’ self-assessments of their ability to manage their personal data.","PeriodicalId":37217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","volume":"22 1","pages":"125 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2051097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This study examined U.S. Facebook users’ privacy concerns and how those concerns, the Facebook users’ perceived abilities to protect their privacy on social media, their perceptions and intentions regarding social media advertising, and their prior experience with data breaches affected their likelihood of experiencing social media fatigue. While previous research has identified general privacy concerns as a contributing factor to social media fatigue, this study proposed that privacy concerns mediate the effect of the other, identified variables to predict social media fatigue, thus contributing to the existing literature by conceptually integrating privacy calculus theory (PCT) and privacy protection motivation theory (PPMT) into a model that demonstrates the pivotal role of privacy concerns as a predictor of social media fatigue. The results indicated that, regarding consumer engagement with social media advertising, the conceptualization of the privacy paradox should not be limited to an assessment of perceived risks and benefits; it should also include users’ self-assessments of their ability to manage their personal data.
社交媒体疲劳与隐私:消费者关注社交媒体平台上个人信息安全的先决条件探析
摘要:本研究考察了美国Facebook用户的隐私担忧,以及这些担忧、Facebook用户在社交媒体上保护自己隐私的感知能力、他们对社交媒体广告的感知和意图,以及他们之前的数据泄露经历如何影响他们体验社交媒体疲劳的可能性。虽然之前的研究已经确定一般的隐私问题是导致社交媒体疲劳的一个因素,但这项研究提出,隐私问题介导了其他预测社交媒体疲劳的已知变量的影响,因此,通过将隐私微积分理论(PCT)和隐私保护动机理论(PPMT)概念整合到一个模型中,从而为现有文献做出贡献,该模型表明隐私问题作为社交媒体疲劳的预测因子的关键作用。研究结果表明,就消费者参与社交媒体广告而言,隐私悖论的概念化不应局限于对感知风险和收益的评估;它还应该包括用户对自己管理个人数据能力的自我评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Advertising
Journal of Interactive Advertising Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书