Gut-brain axis in history and culture

J. Valeur
{"title":"Gut-brain axis in history and culture","authors":"J. Valeur","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gut–brain axis and the microbiome have recently acquired an important position in explaining a wide range of human behaviours and emotions. Researchers have typically presented developments in understandings of the microbiome as radical and new, offering huge potential for better understandings of our bodies and what it means to be human. Without refuting the value of this research, this article insists that, traditionally, doctors and patients acknowledged the complex interactions between their guts and emotions, although using alternative models often based on nerves or psychology. For example, nineteenthcentury doctors and patients would have been well acquainted with the idea that their stomachs and minds were somehow connected, and that this interaction could produce positive or negative physical and mental health impacts. To demonstrate this, this article offers a snapshot of medical and public thought on (what we currently call) the gut–brain axis in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, using Britain as a key case study due to the prevalence of gastric problems in that country. It commences by exploring how nineteenth-century doctors and patients took for granted the intimate relations between gut and mind and used their ideas on this to debate personal health, medical theory and social and political discourse. The article then moves on to argue that various medical sub-disciplines emerged (anatomy, physiology, surgery) that threatened to reduce the stomach to a physiologically complex organ but, in doing so, inadvertently began to erase ideas of a gut–mind connection. However, these new models proved unsatisfactory, allowing more holistic ideas of the body–mind relationship to continue to carry currency in twentieth-century psychological and medical thought. In the late century, pharmacological developments once again threatened to minimise the gut–brain axis, before it once again became popular in the early twenty-first century, now debated through a new language of microbiology. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 31 August 2018 Revised 18 October 2018 Accepted 25 October 2018","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The gut–brain axis and the microbiome have recently acquired an important position in explaining a wide range of human behaviours and emotions. Researchers have typically presented developments in understandings of the microbiome as radical and new, offering huge potential for better understandings of our bodies and what it means to be human. Without refuting the value of this research, this article insists that, traditionally, doctors and patients acknowledged the complex interactions between their guts and emotions, although using alternative models often based on nerves or psychology. For example, nineteenthcentury doctors and patients would have been well acquainted with the idea that their stomachs and minds were somehow connected, and that this interaction could produce positive or negative physical and mental health impacts. To demonstrate this, this article offers a snapshot of medical and public thought on (what we currently call) the gut–brain axis in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, using Britain as a key case study due to the prevalence of gastric problems in that country. It commences by exploring how nineteenth-century doctors and patients took for granted the intimate relations between gut and mind and used their ideas on this to debate personal health, medical theory and social and political discourse. The article then moves on to argue that various medical sub-disciplines emerged (anatomy, physiology, surgery) that threatened to reduce the stomach to a physiologically complex organ but, in doing so, inadvertently began to erase ideas of a gut–mind connection. However, these new models proved unsatisfactory, allowing more holistic ideas of the body–mind relationship to continue to carry currency in twentieth-century psychological and medical thought. In the late century, pharmacological developments once again threatened to minimise the gut–brain axis, before it once again became popular in the early twenty-first century, now debated through a new language of microbiology. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 31 August 2018 Revised 18 October 2018 Accepted 25 October 2018
历史文化中的肠脑轴
肠脑轴和微生物组最近在解释广泛的人类行为和情绪方面获得了重要地位。研究人员通常将对微生物组的理解进展描述为激进和全新的,为更好地理解我们的身体及其对人类的意义提供了巨大的潜力。在不否定这项研究价值的前提下,这篇文章坚持认为,传统上,医生和病人都承认他们的肠道和情绪之间存在复杂的相互作用,尽管使用的是基于神经或心理学的替代模型。例如,19世纪的医生和病人都很清楚,他们的胃和大脑在某种程度上是相连的,这种相互作用会对身体和精神健康产生积极或消极的影响。为了证明这一点,本文简要介绍了19世纪和20世纪医学界和公众对(我们目前所说的)肠脑轴的看法,并以英国为例,因为该国胃病普遍存在。它首先探讨了19世纪的医生和病人是如何理所当然地将肠道和心灵之间的亲密关系视为理所当然的,并利用他们的观点来辩论个人健康、医学理论以及社会和政治话语。文章接着指出,各种各样的医学分支学科(解剖学、生理学、外科)的出现,威胁着要把胃简化为一个生理上复杂的器官,但在这样做的过程中,无意中开始抹去肠道与心灵联系的想法。然而,这些新的模型被证明是不令人满意的,这使得关于身心关系的更全面的观点在20世纪的心理学和医学思想中继续流行。在20世纪后期,药理学的发展再次威胁到最小化肠脑轴,直到21世纪初它再次流行起来,现在通过一种新的微生物学语言进行辩论。文章历史2018年8月31日收稿修改2018年10月18日接受2018年10月25日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信