Differentiation in education: a configurative review

Q2 Social Sciences
Ingunn Eikeland, Stein Erik Solbø Ohna
{"title":"Differentiation in education: a configurative review","authors":"Ingunn Eikeland, Stein Erik Solbø Ohna","doi":"10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Differentiation in education can be seen as a means of responding to student diversity in order to meet the vision of a school for all. Differentiation has been widely addressed within a western context, and it appears to be a versatile phenomenon as it occurs under various guises and with a variety of terms and modes of operationalizations. The aim of this configurative review is to investigate how differentiation appears in the international context and to contribute to a much-needed overview of the concept. Analysis of 28 scientific papers representing a broad range of national affiliations resulted in two main findings. First, differentiation is a complex idea that appears to be presented either as differentiating students or differentiating teaching. Four perspectives for approaching differentiation further illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon: differentiation as individualization, differentiation as adaptation to specific groups, differentiation as adaptations within diverse classrooms, and differentiation in a system perspective. Second, the analysis revealed that there are almost no studies transcending the focus on teachers and the classroom by addressing the organizational or system/policy level. This review argues for the benefits that a more system-oriented perspective of differentiation would provide.","PeriodicalId":52346,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"157 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Differentiation in education can be seen as a means of responding to student diversity in order to meet the vision of a school for all. Differentiation has been widely addressed within a western context, and it appears to be a versatile phenomenon as it occurs under various guises and with a variety of terms and modes of operationalizations. The aim of this configurative review is to investigate how differentiation appears in the international context and to contribute to a much-needed overview of the concept. Analysis of 28 scientific papers representing a broad range of national affiliations resulted in two main findings. First, differentiation is a complex idea that appears to be presented either as differentiating students or differentiating teaching. Four perspectives for approaching differentiation further illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon: differentiation as individualization, differentiation as adaptation to specific groups, differentiation as adaptations within diverse classrooms, and differentiation in a system perspective. Second, the analysis revealed that there are almost no studies transcending the focus on teachers and the classroom by addressing the organizational or system/policy level. This review argues for the benefits that a more system-oriented perspective of differentiation would provide.
教育中的分化:一种构型的回顾
教育的差异化可以被视为一种应对学生多样性的手段,以满足所有人的学校愿景。分化在西方语境中已经得到了广泛的讨论,它似乎是一种多种多样的现象,因为它以各种形式出现,并具有各种术语和操作模式。这一组态审查的目的是调查差异在国际范围内是如何出现的,并有助于对这一概念进行急需的概述。对代表广泛国家关系的28篇科学论文的分析得出了两个主要发现。首先,分化是一个复杂的概念,它要么表现为分化学生,要么表现为分化教学。研究分化的四种视角进一步说明了这一现象的复杂性:作为个性化的分化,作为适应特定群体的分化,作为适应不同课堂的分化,以及系统视角的分化。其次,分析显示,几乎没有研究超越了对教师和课堂的关注,解决了组织或制度/政策层面。这篇综述论证了一个更以系统为导向的差异化视角将提供的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信