Playing Robinhood: Jamming Wall Street with Dumb Money in the Great Short Squeeze

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Nicholas S. Paliewicz
{"title":"Playing Robinhood: Jamming Wall Street with Dumb Money in the Great Short Squeeze","authors":"Nicholas S. Paliewicz","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2196730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay analyzes the rhetorics of social and economic protest surrounding the 2021 short squeeze where swarms of gamers-made-investors used the popular trading app Robinhood to create artificial demands for shorted stocks such as GameStop and AMC. Fueled by populist rhetoric on subreddit forum, r/WallStreetBets, the movement created a short-lived bubble that cost hedge funds billions. I argue that investors were subjectivized by market-based agencies through anger and nostalgia during a COVID-19 period when many were feeling powerless. Through market jamming, investors temporarily used the market, and its neoliberal rationalities, against itself and created new spaces for agency. While market jamming comes with real financial risks, such as a rhetorical panic, it also shows how investors can use détournement in the marketplace.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"251 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2196730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay analyzes the rhetorics of social and economic protest surrounding the 2021 short squeeze where swarms of gamers-made-investors used the popular trading app Robinhood to create artificial demands for shorted stocks such as GameStop and AMC. Fueled by populist rhetoric on subreddit forum, r/WallStreetBets, the movement created a short-lived bubble that cost hedge funds billions. I argue that investors were subjectivized by market-based agencies through anger and nostalgia during a COVID-19 period when many were feeling powerless. Through market jamming, investors temporarily used the market, and its neoliberal rationalities, against itself and created new spaces for agency. While market jamming comes with real financial risks, such as a rhetorical panic, it also shows how investors can use détournement in the marketplace.
扮演罗宾汉:在巨大的短期挤压中用愚蠢的钱堵塞华尔街
本文分析了围绕2021年卖空的社会和经济抗议的言辞,当时成群的玩家自制投资者使用流行的交易应用Robinhood来人为地创造对GameStop和AMC等做空股票的需求。在reddit论坛r/WallStreetBets上的民粹主义言论的推动下,这场运动创造了一个短暂的泡沫,让对冲基金损失了数十亿美元。我认为,在许多人感到无能为力的新冠疫情期间,投资者因愤怒和怀旧情绪而被市场机构主体化。通过市场干扰,投资者暂时利用市场及其新自由主义理性来对抗自己,并为代理创造了新的空间。虽然市场干扰会带来真正的金融风险,比如口头上的恐慌,但它也显示了投资者如何在市场上利用欺诈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信