METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ACCELERATED TESTS OF CRUSHING KNIVES OF GRINDING CATS. COMPARATIVE TESTS OF LOSS OF CUTTING CAPACITY

L. Shustik, V. Pogoriliy, T. Gaidai, S. Stepchenko, S. Sidorenko
{"title":"METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ACCELERATED TESTS OF CRUSHING KNIVES OF GRINDING CATS. COMPARATIVE TESTS OF LOSS OF CUTTING CAPACITY","authors":"L. Shustik, V. Pogoriliy, T. Gaidai, S. Stepchenko, S. Sidorenko","doi":"10.31473/2305-5987-2021-1-29(43)-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The purpose of the research is to analyze the design features and parameters of grinding knives to compare the intensity of loss of cutting ability of each of the models of knives depending on the load cycles. Methods and materials. Conduct an analytical inspection and instrumental studies of the blades of grinding rollers type KR with different design features. Carry out bench accelerated tests based on the cyclic impact load of the knife fragment due to falling on the simulator of wear cycles and check the residual cutting capacity on the cutting simulator. Justify the coefficient of acceleration of tests as a derivative of hardness and density of the simulator, as well as the ratio of the energy of the fall of the knife fragment on the stand and its rotational motion in the field. Statistical analysis of experimental data was performed by analysis of variance and interpreted by standard computer programs Excel in the form of graphs. Results. Analyzing the proposed method for determining the intensity of loss of cutting ability of the knife when it falls on the simulator of plant debris allowed to rank different models and establish their relative resource. Unhardened models of both 45 and 30MnB5 Steel provide low life and their residual cutting ability is only 15-25% compared to hardened models. Analyzing the research results, the hardened model of a knife made of 45 Steel withstands 4 times more load cycles compared to unhardened models, but is inferior to the hardened model of Steel 30MnB5 (borista), which has the highest resource. Even after 150 load cycles (in terms of the work of a roller with a width of 12.5 m - operating time of more than 1000 ha), it retains more than 55% of the initial cutting ability, which is characterized by low intensity of its loss. Conclusions. According to the tests of the intensity of loss of cutting ability of knives, the most acceptable option for the equipment of roller-shredders is a hardened model made of 30MnB5 Steel (borista), which has the highest resource.","PeriodicalId":34711,"journal":{"name":"Tekhnikotekhnologichni aspekti rozvitku ta viprobuvannia novoyi tekhniki i tekhnologii dlia sil''s''kogo gospodarstva Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekhnikotekhnologichni aspekti rozvitku ta viprobuvannia novoyi tekhniki i tekhnologii dlia sil''s''kogo gospodarstva Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31473/2305-5987-2021-1-29(43)-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of the research is to analyze the design features and parameters of grinding knives to compare the intensity of loss of cutting ability of each of the models of knives depending on the load cycles. Methods and materials. Conduct an analytical inspection and instrumental studies of the blades of grinding rollers type KR with different design features. Carry out bench accelerated tests based on the cyclic impact load of the knife fragment due to falling on the simulator of wear cycles and check the residual cutting capacity on the cutting simulator. Justify the coefficient of acceleration of tests as a derivative of hardness and density of the simulator, as well as the ratio of the energy of the fall of the knife fragment on the stand and its rotational motion in the field. Statistical analysis of experimental data was performed by analysis of variance and interpreted by standard computer programs Excel in the form of graphs. Results. Analyzing the proposed method for determining the intensity of loss of cutting ability of the knife when it falls on the simulator of plant debris allowed to rank different models and establish their relative resource. Unhardened models of both 45 and 30MnB5 Steel provide low life and their residual cutting ability is only 15-25% compared to hardened models. Analyzing the research results, the hardened model of a knife made of 45 Steel withstands 4 times more load cycles compared to unhardened models, but is inferior to the hardened model of Steel 30MnB5 (borista), which has the highest resource. Even after 150 load cycles (in terms of the work of a roller with a width of 12.5 m - operating time of more than 1000 ha), it retains more than 55% of the initial cutting ability, which is characterized by low intensity of its loss. Conclusions. According to the tests of the intensity of loss of cutting ability of knives, the most acceptable option for the equipment of roller-shredders is a hardened model made of 30MnB5 Steel (borista), which has the highest resource.
磨猫粉碎刀加速试验的方法学方法。切割能力丧失的比较试验
摘要研究的目的是分析磨削刀的设计特点和参数,比较每种型号的刀具在不同载荷周期下的切削能力损失强度。方法和材料。对不同设计特点的KR型磨辊叶片进行了分析检验和仪器研究。基于刀片落在磨损循环模拟器上的循环冲击载荷进行台架加速试验,并在切割模拟器上检查剩余切割能力。证明试验的加速度系数是模拟器的硬度和密度的导数,以及刀片落在支架上的能量与其在现场的旋转运动的比值。实验数据的统计分析采用方差分析,并用标准计算机程序Excel以图表的形式进行解释。结果。通过分析所提出的刀具落在植物碎片模拟器上切削能力损失强度的确定方法,可以对不同模型进行排序,并建立它们的相对资源。45和30MnB5钢的未硬化型号的寿命较低,其残余切削能力仅为硬化型号的15-25%。分析研究结果,45钢刀的硬化模型比未硬化模型承受的载荷循环次数多4倍,但不如资源最高的30MnB5钢(borista)硬化模型。即使经过150次负载循环(以宽度为12.5米的滚轮的工作-超过1000公顷的操作时间为标准),它仍保留了55%以上的初始切割能力,其特点是其损失强度低。结论。根据对刀具切削能力损失强度的测试,粉碎机设备最可接受的选择是资源最高的30MnB5钢(borista)硬化模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信