Are women leaders significantly better at controlling the contagion?

Q2 Psychology
S. Purkayastha, M. Salvatore, B. Mukherjee
{"title":"Are women leaders significantly better at controlling the contagion?","authors":"S. Purkayastha, M. Salvatore, B. Mukherjee","doi":"10.1101/2020.06.06.20124487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent media articles have suggested that women-led countries are doing better in terms of their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine an ensemble of public health metrics to assess the control of COVID-19 epidemic in women- vs men-led countries worldwide based on data available up to June 3. The median of the distribution of median time-varying effective reproduction number for women and men led countries were 0.89 and 1.14 respectively with the 95% two-sample bootstrap-based confidence interval for the difference (women - men) being [-0.335, 0.028]. In terms of scale of testing, the median percentage of population tested were 3.28% (women), 1.59% (men) [95% CI: (-1.285%, 3.600%)] with test positive rates of 2.69% (women) and 4.94% (men) respectively. It appears that though statistically not significant, countries led by women have an edge over countries led by men in terms of public health metrics for controlling the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.","PeriodicalId":31628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Social Sciences","volume":"5 2 1","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.20124487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Recent media articles have suggested that women-led countries are doing better in terms of their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine an ensemble of public health metrics to assess the control of COVID-19 epidemic in women- vs men-led countries worldwide based on data available up to June 3. The median of the distribution of median time-varying effective reproduction number for women and men led countries were 0.89 and 1.14 respectively with the 95% two-sample bootstrap-based confidence interval for the difference (women - men) being [-0.335, 0.028]. In terms of scale of testing, the median percentage of population tested were 3.28% (women), 1.59% (men) [95% CI: (-1.285%, 3.600%)] with test positive rates of 2.69% (women) and 4.94% (men) respectively. It appears that though statistically not significant, countries led by women have an edge over countries led by men in terms of public health metrics for controlling the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.
女性领导者在控制传染方面是否明显更好?
最近的媒体文章表明,妇女领导的国家在应对COVID-19大流行方面做得更好。根据截至6月3日的现有数据,我们研究了一系列公共卫生指标,以评估全球女性主导国家与男性主导国家对COVID-19流行病的控制情况。女性和男性领导的国家中位时变有效再生产数分布的中位数分别为0.89和1.14,差异(女性-男性)的95%双样本bootstrap置信区间为[-0.335,0.028]。在检测规模方面,人群检测百分比中位数为3.28%(女性),1.59%(男性)[95% CI:(-1.285%, 3.600%)],检测阳性率分别为2.69%(女性)和4.94%(男性)。虽然统计上不显著,但在控制全球COVID-19大流行传播的公共卫生指标方面,由女性领导的国家似乎比由男性领导的国家更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Social Sciences
Journal of Health and Social Sciences Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信