Micropercutaneous Laser Lithotripsy: How to Improve Stone Free Rate

{"title":"Micropercutaneous Laser Lithotripsy: How to Improve Stone Free Rate","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ajun.02.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy is a novel technique with the creation of a 4.85-8F working channel. The advantage of micro-PCNL is the possibility of kidney puncture under direct endoscopic control. Materials and Methods: 99 patients aged 47,3 ± 16.9 years were included in the study. 78 patients had isolated kidney stones (78.8%). The stone size ranged from 8 to 38 mm (13.9 ± 5.4 mm). Group A included stones smaller than 15 mm (57 patients, 57,6%) and Group B included stones larger than 15 mm (42 patients, 42,4%). A 4.85 F percutaneous sheath was used in 38 (38,4%) patients, 8 F sheath was used in 61 (61,6%) patients. A holmium laser for lithotripsy was used in 46.5% cases, the thulium fiber laser in 53.5%. Results: The average surgery time was 39,9 ± 13.7 min (from 13 to 75 min). A stone-free rate (SFR) for patients of both groups was 88.8%. A Double-J stent was placed in 39 (39.4%) patients. In one case conversion to the mini-PCNL was done. In four cases (4%) retrograde stone manipulations were performed through ureteral access sheath. 5 (5.1%) patients required the second micro-PCNL tract. 3 (3%) patients required stenting postoperatively. In 7.1% of cases the episode of acute pyelonephritis developed. In 7 cases (7,1%), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy was required due to residual stones. Conclusions: We recommend using the laser micro-PCNL for the category of patients with severe comorbidities, including coagulopathy. The micro-PCNL could be safely performed in patients with kidney stones larger than 1.5 cm.","PeriodicalId":93064,"journal":{"name":"Advancements in journal of urology and nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancements in journal of urology and nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ajun.02.04.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy is a novel technique with the creation of a 4.85-8F working channel. The advantage of micro-PCNL is the possibility of kidney puncture under direct endoscopic control. Materials and Methods: 99 patients aged 47,3 ± 16.9 years were included in the study. 78 patients had isolated kidney stones (78.8%). The stone size ranged from 8 to 38 mm (13.9 ± 5.4 mm). Group A included stones smaller than 15 mm (57 patients, 57,6%) and Group B included stones larger than 15 mm (42 patients, 42,4%). A 4.85 F percutaneous sheath was used in 38 (38,4%) patients, 8 F sheath was used in 61 (61,6%) patients. A holmium laser for lithotripsy was used in 46.5% cases, the thulium fiber laser in 53.5%. Results: The average surgery time was 39,9 ± 13.7 min (from 13 to 75 min). A stone-free rate (SFR) for patients of both groups was 88.8%. A Double-J stent was placed in 39 (39.4%) patients. In one case conversion to the mini-PCNL was done. In four cases (4%) retrograde stone manipulations were performed through ureteral access sheath. 5 (5.1%) patients required the second micro-PCNL tract. 3 (3%) patients required stenting postoperatively. In 7.1% of cases the episode of acute pyelonephritis developed. In 7 cases (7,1%), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy was required due to residual stones. Conclusions: We recommend using the laser micro-PCNL for the category of patients with severe comorbidities, including coagulopathy. The micro-PCNL could be safely performed in patients with kidney stones larger than 1.5 cm.
微创激光碎石术:如何提高结石清除率
简介:微型经皮肾取石术是一种新型的技术,可产生4.85-8F的工作通道。微型PCNL的优点是可以在直接内镜控制下进行肾穿刺。材料和方法:99名年龄为47岁、3岁±16.9岁的患者被纳入研究。孤立性肾结石78例(78.8%),结石大小8~38mm(13.9±5.4mm)。A组包括小于15 mm的结石(57例,57.6%),B组包括大于15 mm的石块(42例,42.4%)。38例(38.4%)患者使用4.85F经皮鞘,61例(61.6%)患者使用8F鞘。钬激光碎石占46.5%,钬纤维激光碎石占53.5%。结果:平均手术时间为39.9±13.7分钟(13~75分钟)。两组患者的无结石率(SFR)均为88.8%。39名(39.4%)患者植入了双J支架。在一个病例中,进行了向迷你PCNL的转换。在4例(4%)中,通过输尿管入路鞘进行了逆行结石操作。5例(5.1%)患者需要第二道微小PCNL。3例(3%)患者术后需要支架植入。7.1%的病例发生急性肾盂肾炎。7例(7.1%)因残余结石需行体外冲击波碎石术。结论:我们建议对包括凝血障碍在内的严重合并症患者使用激光显微PCNL。微小PCNL可安全地用于肾结石直径大于1.5厘米的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信