Making Up the Difference: Using Custom Reporting to Identify Metadata Inaccuracies in Link Resolver Serial Metadata

IF 0.6 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Serials Review Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2021.1957076

A. Sparling

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Accurate title and holding level metadata in a library’s link resolver knowledgebase is essential to providing access to ejournal entitlements. As a result of their complex title histories, publisher submitted ejournal metadata often needs to be manually updated in the link resolver knowledgebase to ensure title changes and coverage data align. This article will demonstrate how a custom report used at the University of Alberta Library identifies date discrepancies between link resolver and catalog data to drive link resolver knowledgebase clean up work for priority ejournal collections. It will end by highlighting how quality metadata produced by the library community might be leveraged by vendors to improve ejournal holding data globally in their link resolver knowledgebases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

弥补差异：使用自定义报告识别链接解析程序串行元数据中的元数据不准确

摘要图书馆链接解析器知识库中准确的标题和持有级别元数据对于提供对电子权利的访问至关重要。由于其复杂的标题历史记录，出版商提交的电子期刊元数据通常需要在链接解析器知识库中手动更新，以确保标题更改和报道数据一致。本文将展示阿尔伯塔大学图书馆使用的自定义报告如何识别链接解析程序和目录数据之间的日期差异，以推动链接解析程序知识库为优先电子藏品清理工作。最后，它将强调供应商如何利用图书馆社区产生的高质量元数据来改进链接解析器知识库中的全球电子文档保存数据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.