Systematic Review of Common Refractory Symptoms in the End-Of-Life Situation and Its Relation With Euthanasia.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Omega-Journal of Death and Dying Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1177/00302228221089123
Alba Lucena, Oriol Yuguero
{"title":"Systematic Review of Common Refractory Symptoms in the End-Of-Life Situation and Its Relation With Euthanasia.","authors":"Alba Lucena, Oriol Yuguero","doi":"10.1177/00302228221089123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse the available evidence regarding refractory symptoms to treatment in patients receiving palliative/terminal healthcare.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of various databases between September and December 2020; Pubmed; Cochrane; Scopus and ScienceDirect. Study eligibility criteria: Studies published between 1<sup>st</sup> January 2015 and 31<sup>st</sup> of March 2020, in Spanish, English or Catalan conducted in elderly people or terminal patients. The study included systematic reviews, clinical trials and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 782 articles, of which 22 articles were finally reviewed. Of the selected articles, 16 were systematic reviews and three were clinical trials. Three refractory symptoms are notable; breathlessness, delirium and existential suffering. There are various therapeutic approaches for the first two symptoms, but palliative sedation seems to be most effective for existential suffering.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although palliative care enables controlling these symptoms effectively, and following a multidisciplinary approach, there remains a group of patients for whom euthanasia could save foreseeable suffering that is difficult to manage.</p>","PeriodicalId":47794,"journal":{"name":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221089123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the available evidence regarding refractory symptoms to treatment in patients receiving palliative/terminal healthcare.

Design: A systematic review of various databases between September and December 2020; Pubmed; Cochrane; Scopus and ScienceDirect. Study eligibility criteria: Studies published between 1st January 2015 and 31st of March 2020, in Spanish, English or Catalan conducted in elderly people or terminal patients. The study included systematic reviews, clinical trials and interventions.

Results: The search returned 782 articles, of which 22 articles were finally reviewed. Of the selected articles, 16 were systematic reviews and three were clinical trials. Three refractory symptoms are notable; breathlessness, delirium and existential suffering. There are various therapeutic approaches for the first two symptoms, but palliative sedation seems to be most effective for existential suffering.

Conclusions: Although palliative care enables controlling these symptoms effectively, and following a multidisciplinary approach, there remains a group of patients for whom euthanasia could save foreseeable suffering that is difficult to manage.

生命末期常见难治性症状及其与安乐死的关系的系统综述
目的:分析接受姑息/临终保健的患者的难治性症状与治疗的现有证据。2020年9月至12月DESIGNA各数据库系统综述;Pubmed;科克伦;Scopus和ScienceDirect。研究资格标准:2015年1月1日至2020年3月31日期间发表的研究,以西班牙语、英语或加泰罗尼亚语在老年人或晚期患者中进行。该研究包括系统综述、临床试验和干预。结果共检索到文献782篇,最终审阅了22篇。在入选的文章中,16篇是系统综述,3篇是临床试验。三种难治性症状显著;呼吸困难,精神错乱和存在的痛苦。对于前两种症状有多种治疗方法,但姑息性镇静似乎对存在性痛苦最有效。结论:虽然姑息治疗能够有效地控制这些症状,并遵循多学科方法,但仍有一组患者安乐死可以减轻可预见的痛苦,难以管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
259
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信