Running economy in elite soccer and futsal players: differences among positions on the field

P. R. Santos-Silva, J. Greve, A. Pedrinelli
{"title":"Running economy in elite soccer and futsal players: differences among positions on the field","authors":"P. R. Santos-Silva, J. Greve, A. Pedrinelli","doi":"10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To determine running economy in a large sample of elite soccer and futsal players to obtain benchmarks in different positions. METHODS: Running Economy is the energy demand at a submaximal running velocity. Players were divided into 6 subgroups. Soccer: defenders, midfielders, and strikers; futsal: defenders, wingers, and pivots. Elite soccer players (n=129) and elite futsal players n=72 performed an incremental running test starting at 8.4 km.h-1 with increments of 1.2 km.h-1 every two minutes on a treadmill until exhaustion. Running Economy was determined by interpolation between ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2 (VT1 and VT2). RESULTS: Running Economy (measured as mL.kg-1.km-1) was compared between the playing positions in the two team sports. In soccer, running economy was 222.7 (defenders), 227.0 (midfielders), and 219.8 (strikers) mL.kg-1. km-1, respectively. In futsal, the corresponding values were 198.5 (defenders), 196.9 (wingers), and 190.5 (pivots) mL.kg-1.km-1, respectively. We no found significantly differences between the three positions in both sports. The Running Economy of futsal players was 12.5% better than that of soccer players. Running Economy correlated positively with oxygen uptake at VT2 in both sports and in all positions. CONCLUSION: Futsal players exhibited better Running Economy than soccer players; this should be considered as a factor in the athlete’s training plan.","PeriodicalId":31471,"journal":{"name":"Medical Express","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine running economy in a large sample of elite soccer and futsal players to obtain benchmarks in different positions. METHODS: Running Economy is the energy demand at a submaximal running velocity. Players were divided into 6 subgroups. Soccer: defenders, midfielders, and strikers; futsal: defenders, wingers, and pivots. Elite soccer players (n=129) and elite futsal players n=72 performed an incremental running test starting at 8.4 km.h-1 with increments of 1.2 km.h-1 every two minutes on a treadmill until exhaustion. Running Economy was determined by interpolation between ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2 (VT1 and VT2). RESULTS: Running Economy (measured as mL.kg-1.km-1) was compared between the playing positions in the two team sports. In soccer, running economy was 222.7 (defenders), 227.0 (midfielders), and 219.8 (strikers) mL.kg-1. km-1, respectively. In futsal, the corresponding values were 198.5 (defenders), 196.9 (wingers), and 190.5 (pivots) mL.kg-1.km-1, respectively. We no found significantly differences between the three positions in both sports. The Running Economy of futsal players was 12.5% better than that of soccer players. Running Economy correlated positively with oxygen uptake at VT2 in both sports and in all positions. CONCLUSION: Futsal players exhibited better Running Economy than soccer players; this should be considered as a factor in the athlete’s training plan.
精英足球和五人制足球运动员的经济运行:场上不同位置的差异
目的:在大样本的精英足球运动员和五人制足球运动员中确定运行经济性,以获得不同位置的基准。方法:运行经济性是指在次最大运行速度下的能量需求。球员被分为6个小组。足球:后卫、中场和前锋;五人制足球:后卫、边锋和支点。精英足球运动员(129人)和精英五人制足球运动员(72人)在跑步机上进行了一项增量跑步测试,从8.4公里/小时-1开始,每两分钟增加1.2公里/小时,直到筋疲力尽。通过通气阈值1和2(VT1和VT2)之间的插值来确定运行经济性。结果:比较了两个团体项目中不同运动位置的跑步经济性(mL.kg-1.km-1)。在足球比赛中,跑动经济为222.7(后卫)、227.0(中场)和219.8(前锋)mL.kg-1。km-1。在五人制足球中,相应的数值分别为198.5(防守队员)、196.9(边锋)和190.5(支点)mL.kg-1km-1。在两项运动中,我们没有发现三个位置之间有显著差异。五人制足球运动员的跑步经济比足球运动员好12.5%。在运动和所有姿势中,跑步经济性与VT2的摄氧量呈正相关。结论:五人制足球运动员比足球运动员表现出更好的奔跑经济性;这应该被视为运动员训练计划中的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信