Combining Chinese and Persian medicine techniques of cupping in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Reihane Alipour, Mehrdad Karimi, MohammadSadegh Adel-Mehraban, Assie Jokar, Mohebat Vali, AmirHooman Kazemi
{"title":"Combining Chinese and Persian medicine techniques of cupping in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial","authors":"Reihane Alipour,&nbsp;Mehrdad Karimi,&nbsp;MohammadSadegh Adel-Mehraban,&nbsp;Assie Jokar,&nbsp;Mohebat Vali,&nbsp;AmirHooman Kazemi","doi":"10.1007/s13596-023-00693-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>COVID-19 pneumonia and long COVID is commonly associated with cough, dyspnea and declined oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>). Cupping has been used as an adjuvant therapy to improve SpO<sub>2</sub> and respiratory symptoms. This research was conducted as an assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial. A total of 72 hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were randomly assigned into two groups: (1) cupping (CUPP); and (2) control (CTRL), all receiving conventional treatment. In CUPP, warm cupping was performed for 3–7 days (three times, daily). The primary clinical outcomes were SpO<sub>2</sub> and respiratory rate (RR). COVID-19-related hospitalization duration, intensive care unit admission and duration, need for intubation, and mortality (all up to day 28) were evaluated as secondary efficacy endpoints. Furthermore, severity of cough, dyspnea, chest tightness, and oxygen demand were considered as secondary outcomes. Thirty-four patients in CUPP and 33 patients in CTRL completed the study. After 3 days, RR decreased in CUPP significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), unlike CTRL (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). After 7 days of intervention, SpO<sub>2</sub> improved up to 13% in CUPP versus 0.07% in CTRL (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Compared with CTRL, patients in CUPP were discharged sooner (mean: 12.1 vs. 3.9, respectively) and faced no serious adverse events (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, after 28 days of follow-up, all CUPP patients were discharged from the hospital. In contrast, eight patients from the CTRL expired. Within 3 days, respiratory symptoms improved significantly in CUPP compared with CTRL (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Adjuvant cupping therapy accelerates alleviation of respiratory symptoms and prevents morbidities and mortalities in COVID-19 patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7613,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Traditional Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"253 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Traditional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13596-023-00693-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 pneumonia and long COVID is commonly associated with cough, dyspnea and declined oxygen saturation (SpO2). Cupping has been used as an adjuvant therapy to improve SpO2 and respiratory symptoms. This research was conducted as an assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial. A total of 72 hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were randomly assigned into two groups: (1) cupping (CUPP); and (2) control (CTRL), all receiving conventional treatment. In CUPP, warm cupping was performed for 3–7 days (three times, daily). The primary clinical outcomes were SpO2 and respiratory rate (RR). COVID-19-related hospitalization duration, intensive care unit admission and duration, need for intubation, and mortality (all up to day 28) were evaluated as secondary efficacy endpoints. Furthermore, severity of cough, dyspnea, chest tightness, and oxygen demand were considered as secondary outcomes. Thirty-four patients in CUPP and 33 patients in CTRL completed the study. After 3 days, RR decreased in CUPP significantly (p < 0.001), unlike CTRL (p > 0.05). After 7 days of intervention, SpO2 improved up to 13% in CUPP versus 0.07% in CTRL (p < 0.001). Compared with CTRL, patients in CUPP were discharged sooner (mean: 12.1 vs. 3.9, respectively) and faced no serious adverse events (p < 0.001). Moreover, after 28 days of follow-up, all CUPP patients were discharged from the hospital. In contrast, eight patients from the CTRL expired. Within 3 days, respiratory symptoms improved significantly in CUPP compared with CTRL (p < 0.05). Adjuvant cupping therapy accelerates alleviation of respiratory symptoms and prevents morbidities and mortalities in COVID-19 patients.

中西医结合拔罐治疗新冠肺炎住院患者的单盲随机对照试验
COVID-19肺炎和长COVID通常伴有咳嗽、呼吸困难和血氧饱和度(SpO2)下降。拔罐疗法已被用作改善 SpO2 和呼吸道症状的辅助疗法。这项研究是一项由评估者和分析者双盲的随机对照试验。共有 72 名中重度 COVID-19 住院患者被随机分配到两组:(1) 拔罐组(CUPP);(2) 对照组(CTRL),所有患者均接受常规治疗。在 CUPP 组中,拔罐疗法持续 3-7 天(每天三次)。主要临床结果为SpO2和呼吸频率(RR)。与 COVID-19 相关的住院时间、重症监护室入院时间、插管需求和死亡率(均截至第 28 天)作为次要疗效终点进行评估。此外,咳嗽、呼吸困难、胸闷和需氧量的严重程度也被视为次要结果。34 名 CUPP 患者和 33 名 CTRL 患者完成了研究。3 天后,CUPP 的 RR 显著下降(p < 0.001),而 CTRL 则不同(p > 0.05)。干预 7 天后,CUPP 的 SpO2 改善达 13%,而 CTRL 仅为 0.07%(p < 0.001)。与 CTRL 相比,CUPP 患者出院时间更早(平均出院时间为 12.1 天,CTRL 患者为 3.9 天),且未发生严重不良事件(p < 0.001)。此外,经过 28 天的随访,所有 CUPP 患者均已出院。相比之下,CTRL 有 8 名患者死亡。在 3 天内,与 CTRL 相比,CUPP 患者的呼吸道症状明显改善(p < 0.05)。辅助拔罐疗法可加速缓解 COVID-19 患者的呼吸道症状,并预防发病和死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Traditional Medicine
Advances in Traditional Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Advances in Traditional Medicine (ADTM) is an international and peer-reviewed journal and publishes a variety of articles including original researches, reviews, short communications, and case-reports. ADTM aims to bridging the gap between Traditional knowledge and medical advances. The journal focuses on publishing valid, relevant, and rigorous experimental research and clinical applications of Traditidnal Medicine as well as medical classics. At the same time, the journal is devoted to communication among basic researcher and medical clinician interested in the advancement of Traditional Medicine. Topics covered by the journal are: Medical Classics & History; Biomedical Research; Pharmacology & Toxicology of Natural Products; Acupuncture & Moxibustion; Sasang Constitutional Medicine; Diagnostics and Instrumental Development; Clinical Research. ADTM is published four times yearly. The publication date of this journal is 30th March, June, September, and December.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信