Tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis aguda durante la pandemia: el daño colateral del COVID-19

M. C. Barreiro, Tomás Lanceloti, Roberto Salgado, David Solinas, Manuela Rodríguez Olivieri, Micaela Goya, Milena Napolitano, R. Oddi
{"title":"Tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis aguda durante la pandemia: el daño colateral del COVID-19","authors":"M. C. Barreiro, Tomás Lanceloti, Roberto Salgado, David Solinas, Manuela Rodríguez Olivieri, Micaela Goya, Milena Napolitano, R. Oddi","doi":"10.25132/RAAC.V112.N4.1570.EI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 pandemic has generated changes regarding the management of patients with all kind of pathologies. Here we show the experience concerning the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) in a teaching hospital in the city of Buenos Aires during the lockdown, and its comparison with the same period of 2019 in order to assess the differences between the timing for consultation, intraoperative findings and the treatment outcome. Material and methods: A prospective database was retrospectively analyzed. We compared patients undergoing surgical treatment for AA in March-July of 2019 v. March-July 2020, taking into account the preoperative period and comparing the outcome regarding the surgical intervention and the impact in the postoperative period between the two groups. Results: 127 patients were included, 46 treated during the pandemic. Patients undergoing surgical treatment during the pandemic had a higher incidence of peritonitis (61.7% vs. 76.1%; p = 0.09) and higher requirement of abdominal drainage (9.9% vs. 23.9%; p = 0.03). There was an increase in the incidence of complications (10.9 vs. 4.9%; p: 0.21), reoperations (8.7 vs. 1.23%, p: 0.03), readmissions (6.5 vs. 0%, p: 0.02) and need for out-patient intravenous antibiotics (6.5 vs. 0%; p: 0.02). The average hospital length was of 1.89 (SD 2.04) and 3.24 (SD 7.31) for the groups operated before and during pandemic, respectively. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients undergoing surgical intervention because of AA decreased compared to the previous year, with increased complications in the postoperative period, higher compromise of the appendix, and longer hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":78597,"journal":{"name":"Revista argentina de cirugia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista argentina de cirugia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25132/RAAC.V112.N4.1570.EI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has generated changes regarding the management of patients with all kind of pathologies. Here we show the experience concerning the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) in a teaching hospital in the city of Buenos Aires during the lockdown, and its comparison with the same period of 2019 in order to assess the differences between the timing for consultation, intraoperative findings and the treatment outcome. Material and methods: A prospective database was retrospectively analyzed. We compared patients undergoing surgical treatment for AA in March-July of 2019 v. March-July 2020, taking into account the preoperative period and comparing the outcome regarding the surgical intervention and the impact in the postoperative period between the two groups. Results: 127 patients were included, 46 treated during the pandemic. Patients undergoing surgical treatment during the pandemic had a higher incidence of peritonitis (61.7% vs. 76.1%; p = 0.09) and higher requirement of abdominal drainage (9.9% vs. 23.9%; p = 0.03). There was an increase in the incidence of complications (10.9 vs. 4.9%; p: 0.21), reoperations (8.7 vs. 1.23%, p: 0.03), readmissions (6.5 vs. 0%, p: 0.02) and need for out-patient intravenous antibiotics (6.5 vs. 0%; p: 0.02). The average hospital length was of 1.89 (SD 2.04) and 3.24 (SD 7.31) for the groups operated before and during pandemic, respectively. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients undergoing surgical intervention because of AA decreased compared to the previous year, with increased complications in the postoperative period, higher compromise of the appendix, and longer hospital stay.
大流行期间急性阑尾炎的外科治疗:新冠病毒的附带损害
背景:新冠肺炎大流行已导致各种疾病患者的管理发生变化。在这里,我们展示了封锁期间布宜诺斯艾利斯市一家教学医院外科治疗急性阑尾炎(AA)的经验,以及与2019年同期的比较,以评估会诊时间、术中发现和治疗结果之间的差异。材料和方法:对前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。我们比较了2019年3月至7月与2020年3月和7月接受AA手术治疗的患者,考虑到术前阶段,并比较了两组手术干预的结果和术后阶段的影响。结果:纳入127名患者,其中46人在疫情期间接受了治疗。在疫情期间接受手术治疗的患者腹膜炎发生率更高(61.7%对76.1%;p=0.09),腹腔引流需求更高(9.9%对23.9%;p=0.03),再次入院(6.5对0%,p:0.02)和需要门诊静脉注射抗生素(6.5对0%,p:02)。在大流行前和期间手术的组的平均住院时间分别为1.89(SD 2.04)和3.24(SD 7.31)。结论:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,与前一年相比,因AA接受手术干预的患者数量减少,术后并发症增加,阑尾受损程度更高,住院时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书