An Ecologic Analysis of Comorbidities in Patients with COVID-19 in Philadelphia and New York City

Krystina Johnson, I. Hollin, A. Palumbo, J. Spitzer, D. Sarwer
{"title":"An Ecologic Analysis of Comorbidities in Patients with COVID-19 in Philadelphia and New York City","authors":"Krystina Johnson, I. Hollin, A. Palumbo, J. Spitzer, D. Sarwer","doi":"10.15367/ch.v1i3.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Early scientific reports of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that the coronavirus was associated with more serious disease and mortality in older adults. However, additional research suggested that those with underlying comorbidities, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart and respiratory diseases were most at risk for more severe outcomes. As a result, most studies focused on comorbidities among those who were hospitalized or critically ill. There is a need to understand how common comorbidities are associated with overall risk of infection. This analysis aimed to explore the relationship between COVID-19 infection and common comorbidities. Methods: An ecologic analysis explored aggregate case counts of COVID-19 cases across zip codes compared to area-level estimates of health-related variables and outcomes in Philadelphia, PA and New York City, NY. Results: The analysis found that small area-estimated rates of obesity and asthma were significant ecologic predictors of population-based rates of COVID-19 cases in New York City. In contrast, small area-estimates rates of arthritis were significant predictors in Philadelphia. Conclusions: There are important area-level variations in COVID-19 infections that are correlated with variations in other chronic conditions, suggesting that factors that influence health disparities may affect the distribution of COVID-19. ","PeriodicalId":72639,"journal":{"name":"Commonhealth (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commonhealth (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15367/ch.v1i3.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Early scientific reports of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that the coronavirus was associated with more serious disease and mortality in older adults. However, additional research suggested that those with underlying comorbidities, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart and respiratory diseases were most at risk for more severe outcomes. As a result, most studies focused on comorbidities among those who were hospitalized or critically ill. There is a need to understand how common comorbidities are associated with overall risk of infection. This analysis aimed to explore the relationship between COVID-19 infection and common comorbidities. Methods: An ecologic analysis explored aggregate case counts of COVID-19 cases across zip codes compared to area-level estimates of health-related variables and outcomes in Philadelphia, PA and New York City, NY. Results: The analysis found that small area-estimated rates of obesity and asthma were significant ecologic predictors of population-based rates of COVID-19 cases in New York City. In contrast, small area-estimates rates of arthritis were significant predictors in Philadelphia. Conclusions: There are important area-level variations in COVID-19 infections that are correlated with variations in other chronic conditions, suggesting that factors that influence health disparities may affect the distribution of COVID-19. 
费城和纽约市新冠肺炎患者合并症的生态学分析
目的:新冠肺炎大流行的早期科学报告表明,冠状病毒与老年人更严重的疾病和死亡率有关。然而,其他研究表明,那些患有潜在合并症的人,包括肥胖、2型糖尿病、心脏病和呼吸系统疾病,最有可能出现更严重的后果。因此,大多数研究都集中在住院或危重患者的合并症上。有必要了解常见的合并症如何与感染的总体风险相关。本分析旨在探讨新冠肺炎感染与常见合并症之间的关系。方法:一项生态分析探讨了不同邮政编码的新冠肺炎病例的总病例数,并与宾夕法尼亚州费城和纽约市健康相关变量和结果的地区层面估计进行了比较。结果:分析发现,小面积估计的肥胖和哮喘发病率是纽约市新冠肺炎病例基于人群发病率的重要生态预测因素。相比之下,小面积估计的关节炎发生率是费城的重要预测因素。结论:新冠肺炎感染存在重要的地区性差异,与其他慢性疾病的差异相关,这表明影响健康差异的因素可能会影响新冠肺炎的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信