{"title":"New Evidence for Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops spp.) Population Connectivity between Kangaroo Island and South Australian Mainland Waters","authors":"Nardi Cribb, P. Bartram, Tony Bartram, L. Seuront","doi":"10.4236/OJMS.2018.81003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited information still exists on the movements of bottlenose dolphins in \nSouth Australian coastal waters. There is, however, a need to overcome this \npaucity of information for an effective development and implementation of \nconservation and management initiatives in these waters that are increasingly \nthreatened by anthropogenic activities. This study infers potential movements \nof bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) between Kangaroo Island that separate \nand shelter South Australian coastal waters from the Southern Ocean swell, \nand the South Australian mainland (The Fleurieu Peninsula and The Adelaide \nDolphin Sanctuary). Bottlenose dolphins were identified from three separate \nphoto-identification catalogues collated from around the South Australian \ncoastline. Of the 3518, 654 and 181 dolphins sighted in Kangaroo Island, \nFleurieu Peninsula and the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary, 233, 74 and 40 individuals \nwere recognizable, respectively. Resighting rates were similar in Kangaroo \nIsland (70.4%) and Fleurieu Peninsula (75.7%), but much lower in the \nAdelaide Dolphin Sanctuary (35%). Ten individuals were resighted between \nKangaroo Island and the Fleurieu Peninsula, whilst no matches were made \nbetween these two locations and the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary catalogue. \nThis suggests a longitudinal connectivity between Kangaroo Island and South \nAustralian mainland waters, but a lack of latitudinal connectivity that may \nresult from the physical stratification processes that separate northern and \nsouthern South Australian waters. Our results also demonstrate the highly \nmobile nature of this species within South Australian waters as well as establish photo-identification as an effective non-invasive tool in which to monitor \nlong-term movement patterns).","PeriodicalId":65849,"journal":{"name":"海洋科学期刊(英文)","volume":"08 1","pages":"38-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"海洋科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJMS.2018.81003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Limited information still exists on the movements of bottlenose dolphins in
South Australian coastal waters. There is, however, a need to overcome this
paucity of information for an effective development and implementation of
conservation and management initiatives in these waters that are increasingly
threatened by anthropogenic activities. This study infers potential movements
of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) between Kangaroo Island that separate
and shelter South Australian coastal waters from the Southern Ocean swell,
and the South Australian mainland (The Fleurieu Peninsula and The Adelaide
Dolphin Sanctuary). Bottlenose dolphins were identified from three separate
photo-identification catalogues collated from around the South Australian
coastline. Of the 3518, 654 and 181 dolphins sighted in Kangaroo Island,
Fleurieu Peninsula and the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary, 233, 74 and 40 individuals
were recognizable, respectively. Resighting rates were similar in Kangaroo
Island (70.4%) and Fleurieu Peninsula (75.7%), but much lower in the
Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary (35%). Ten individuals were resighted between
Kangaroo Island and the Fleurieu Peninsula, whilst no matches were made
between these two locations and the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary catalogue.
This suggests a longitudinal connectivity between Kangaroo Island and South
Australian mainland waters, but a lack of latitudinal connectivity that may
result from the physical stratification processes that separate northern and
southern South Australian waters. Our results also demonstrate the highly
mobile nature of this species within South Australian waters as well as establish photo-identification as an effective non-invasive tool in which to monitor
long-term movement patterns).