Prediction of uniaxial and biaxial flexural strengths of resin-based composites using the Weibull model.

Raluca Ghelbere, N. Ilie
{"title":"Prediction of uniaxial and biaxial flexural strengths of resin-based composites using the Weibull model.","authors":"Raluca Ghelbere, N. Ilie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4045919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe aim of the study was to assess the applicability of the Weibull model for resin-based composites (RBC) to predict the outcome of different flexural tests based on one another, while identifying the minimal sample number for a precise Weibull representation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFour RBCs underwent 3-point, 4-point and biaxial flexural testing (n = 480). Fracture surfaces of all specimens were assessed under optical microscope, while fracture modes of the uniaxial specimens were documented. Representative specimens for each fracture mode were further analyzed under scanning electron microscope. Since fracture predominantly originated from a surface flaw, the effective surface was used in the Weibull model. The analysis was performed on 20, then 30 and finally 40 specimens per group to assess the effect of the specimen size. Further statistical analysis was performed through uni- and multivariate ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05), and Pearson's correlation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe Weibull model could predict the results of uniaxial tests within the standard deviation, with the correlation between calculated and measured values reaching values of R2 = 0.985 and higher. Predictions for or based on the biaxial tests misestimated the measured values, with a weaker correlation (R2 = 0.875) between measured and calculated flexural strength (FS). The fit of the data to the Weibull distribution improved with rising sample size resulting in better predictions of the FS when n = 40.\n\n\nSIGNIFICANCE\nThe applicability of the Weibull model on RBCs allows accurate comparison between bending tests and their FS under consideration of the effective surface.","PeriodicalId":94117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","volume":"131 1","pages":"105231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4045919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the applicability of the Weibull model for resin-based composites (RBC) to predict the outcome of different flexural tests based on one another, while identifying the minimal sample number for a precise Weibull representation. METHODS Four RBCs underwent 3-point, 4-point and biaxial flexural testing (n = 480). Fracture surfaces of all specimens were assessed under optical microscope, while fracture modes of the uniaxial specimens were documented. Representative specimens for each fracture mode were further analyzed under scanning electron microscope. Since fracture predominantly originated from a surface flaw, the effective surface was used in the Weibull model. The analysis was performed on 20, then 30 and finally 40 specimens per group to assess the effect of the specimen size. Further statistical analysis was performed through uni- and multivariate ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05), and Pearson's correlation. RESULTS The Weibull model could predict the results of uniaxial tests within the standard deviation, with the correlation between calculated and measured values reaching values of R2 = 0.985 and higher. Predictions for or based on the biaxial tests misestimated the measured values, with a weaker correlation (R2 = 0.875) between measured and calculated flexural strength (FS). The fit of the data to the Weibull distribution improved with rising sample size resulting in better predictions of the FS when n = 40. SIGNIFICANCE The applicability of the Weibull model on RBCs allows accurate comparison between bending tests and their FS under consideration of the effective surface.
用威布尔模型预测树脂基复合材料的单轴和双轴弯曲强度。
目的本研究的目的是评估树脂基复合材料(RBC)的威布尔模型在预测不同弯曲试验结果方面的适用性,同时确定精确威布尔表示的最小样本数。方法对4个红细胞进行了3点、4点和双轴弯曲试验(n=480)。在光学显微镜下评估所有试样的断裂表面,同时记录单轴试样的断裂模式。在扫描电子显微镜下进一步分析了每种断裂模式的代表性试样。由于断裂主要来源于表面缺陷,因此威布尔模型中使用了有效表面。对每组20个、30个和最后40个样本进行分析,以评估样本大小的影响。通过单因素和多因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验(α=0.05)和Pearson相关性进行进一步的统计分析。结果威布尔模型可以在标准偏差范围内预测单轴试验的结果,计算值和测量值之间的相关性达到R2=0.985或更高。双轴试验或基于双轴试验的预测错误估计了测量值,测量和计算的抗弯强度(FS)之间的相关性较弱(R2=0.875)。数据与威布尔分布的拟合随着样本量的增加而改善,从而在n=40时更好地预测FS。威布尔模型在RBC上的适用性允许在考虑有效表面的情况下准确比较弯曲试验及其FS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信