Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement

IF 3.1 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Collabra-Psychology Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/vef2c

R. A. Klein, C. Cook, C. Ebersole, Christine Vitiello, B. Nosek, Christopher R. Chartier, Cody Daniel Christopherson, Samuel L. Clay, Brian Collisson, Jarret T. Crawford, R. Cromar, Devere Vidamuerte, Gwendolyn Gardiner, C. Gosnell, Jon E. Grahe, Calvin J Hall, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, A. Legg, C. Levitan, A. Mancini, Dylan Manfredi, Jason M. Miller, G. Nave, Liz Redford, Ilaria Schlitz, Kathleen Schmidt, Jeanine L. M. Skorinko, Daniel Storage, T. Swanson, Lyn M. van Swol, L. Vaughn, Kate A. Ratliff

{"title":"Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement","authors":"R. A. Klein, C. Cook, C. Ebersole, Christine Vitiello, B. Nosek, Christopher R. Chartier, Cody Daniel Christopherson, Samuel L. Clay, Brian Collisson, Jarret T. Crawford, R. Cromar, Devere Vidamuerte, Gwendolyn Gardiner, C. Gosnell, Jon E. Grahe, Calvin J Hall, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, A. Legg, C. Levitan, A. Mancini, Dylan Manfredi, Jason M. Miller, G. Nave, Liz Redford, Ilaria Schlitz, Kathleen Schmidt, Jeanine L. M. Skorinko, Daniel Storage, T. Swanson, Lyn M. van Swol, L. Vaughn, Kate A. Ratliff","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/vef2c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpreting a failure to replicate is complicated by the fact that the failure could be due to the original finding being a false positive, unrecognized moderating influences between the original and replication procedures, or faulty implementation of the procedures in the replication. One strategy to maximize replication quality is involving the original authors in study design. We (N = 21 Labs and N = 2,220 participants) experimentally tested whether original author involvement improved replicability of a classic finding from Terror Management Theory (Greenberg et al., 1994). Our results were non-diagnostic of whether original author involvement improves replicability because we were unable to replicate the finding under any conditions. This suggests that the original finding was either a false positive or the conditions necessary to obtain it are not yet understood or no longer exist. Data, materials, analysis code, preregistration, and supplementary documents can be found on the OSF page: https://osf.io/8ccnw/","PeriodicalId":45791,"journal":{"name":"Collabra-Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collabra-Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vef2c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 81

Abstract

Interpreting a failure to replicate is complicated by the fact that the failure could be due to the original finding being a false positive, unrecognized moderating influences between the original and replication procedures, or faulty implementation of the procedures in the replication. One strategy to maximize replication quality is involving the original authors in study design. We (N = 21 Labs and N = 2,220 participants) experimentally tested whether original author involvement improved replicability of a classic finding from Terror Management Theory (Greenberg et al., 1994). Our results were non-diagnostic of whether original author involvement improves replicability because we were unable to replicate the finding under any conditions. This suggests that the original finding was either a false positive or the conditions necessary to obtain it are not yet understood or no longer exist. Data, materials, analysis code, preregistration, and supplementary documents can be found on the OSF page: https://osf.io/8ccnw/

查看原文本刊更多论文

许多实验4:在有或没有原作者参与的情况下未能复制死亡率显著效应

对复制失败的解释很复杂，因为失败可能是由于原始发现是假阳性，原始和复制程序之间未被识别的缓和影响，或复制过程中错误地执行了程序。最大限度提高复制质量的一个策略是让原作者参与研究设计。我们(N = 21个实验室和N = 2220名参与者)通过实验测试了原作者参与是否可以提高恐怖管理理论中经典发现的可重复性(Greenberg et al.， 1994)。我们的结果不能诊断原作者参与是否能提高可重复性，因为我们无法在任何条件下复制该发现。这表明，最初的发现要么是假阳性，要么是获得它所需的条件尚未被理解，要么不再存在。数据、资料、分析代码、预注册和补充文档可以在OSF页面上找到:https://osf.io/8ccnw/

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Collabra-Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

4.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Collabra: Psychology has 7 sections representing the broad field of psychology, and a highlighted focus area of “Methodology and Research Practice.” Are: Cognitive Psychology Social Psychology Personality Psychology Clinical Psychology Developmental Psychology Organizational Behavior Methodology and Research Practice.