DESJUDICIALIZAÇÃO – ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E DIREITOS INDISPONÍVEIS – COMO EQUACIONAR OS NOVOS PARADIGMAS SOCIAIS ENTRE O JUDICIAL E O EXTRAJUDICIAL

Mauro Gonzaga Alves Junior
{"title":"DESJUDICIALIZAÇÃO – ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E DIREITOS INDISPONÍVEIS – COMO EQUACIONAR OS NOVOS PARADIGMAS SOCIAIS ENTRE O JUDICIAL E O EXTRAJUDICIAL","authors":"Mauro Gonzaga Alves Junior","doi":"10.34060/reesmat.v12i19.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, without pretending to exhaust the theme, we intend to analyze how them is judicialization can contribute to the effective access to justice, as well as, help to speed and effectiveness of the Judiciary. In the meantime, we dare to advance on issues that are often untouchable, such as the so-called \"unavailable rights\", where, for us, there is a large part of these rights that allow for resolution, or at least an extrajudicial attempt. With the inaugural proposal, we envisage debating how notarial mediation and conciliation can help access to a just legal order and social pacification through the consensual prevention of litigation. For the development of this research was used the deductive method, in addition to bibliographical research.","PeriodicalId":31433,"journal":{"name":"Revista ESMAT","volume":"12 1","pages":"175-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ESMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34060/reesmat.v12i19.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, without pretending to exhaust the theme, we intend to analyze how them is judicialization can contribute to the effective access to justice, as well as, help to speed and effectiveness of the Judiciary. In the meantime, we dare to advance on issues that are often untouchable, such as the so-called "unavailable rights", where, for us, there is a large part of these rights that allow for resolution, or at least an extrajudicial attempt. With the inaugural proposal, we envisage debating how notarial mediation and conciliation can help access to a just legal order and social pacification through the consensual prevention of litigation. For the development of this research was used the deductive method, in addition to bibliographical research.
去司法化-获得正义和不可获得的权利-如何平衡司法和法外之间的新的社会范式
在这篇文章中,在不假装穷尽主题的情况下,我们打算分析司法化如何有助于有效地诉诸司法,以及有助于司法机构的速度和效力。与此同时,我们敢于在通常不可触及的问题上取得进展,例如所谓的“不可获得的权利”,对我们来说,这些权利中有很大一部分是可以解决的,或者至少是一种法外企图。在最初的提案中,我们设想讨论公证调解和调解如何通过双方同意的诉讼预防来帮助获得公正的法律秩序和社会安宁。对于这一研究的发展,除了文献学研究外,还采用了演绎法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信