Corporate life cycle, family firms, and earnings management: Evidence from Taiwan

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xinmei Xie , Yu-Shan Chang , Min-Jeng Shiue
{"title":"Corporate life cycle, family firms, and earnings management: Evidence from Taiwan","authors":"Xinmei Xie ,&nbsp;Yu-Shan Chang ,&nbsp;Min-Jeng Shiue","doi":"10.1016/j.adiac.2021.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Is the corporate life cycle an important factor in management's decisions about real activities management (RAM)? In this study, we empirically investigate firms' RAM activities across the corporate life cycle, given the various costs and constraints associated with the alternative earnings management mechanisms across the life cycle stages. We examine both an aggregate RAM proxy and individual RAM proxies including operating and investing RAM such as sales, expenses, and production cost management, and sales of long-term assets. Employing the Dickinson (2011) proxy of corporate life cycle and Taiwanese data, we document that at the aggregate level, firms in the decline stage are more likely than mature firms to manage earnings upward with RAM. Using the individual RAM proxies, we find that firms in the early life cycle stages prefer sales management to the other RAM mechanisms, especially expenses management. Decline firms employ more sales and production cost management and investing RAM but a similar level of expenses management relative to mature firms. We further find that family firms in the introduction and decline stages engage in more RAM than mature family firms while nonfamily firms do not. Overall, our results indicate that firms prefer different RAM mechanisms across the life cycle stages, that these preferences differ between family and non-family firms, and that these preferences are stronger in family firms. The results are robust after using alternative proxies of operating RAM and additional control variables of corporate governance<span>. Our findings are of interest to investors, auditors, regulators, and academics concerning financial reporting quality and financial statement analysis.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":46906,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611021000675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Is the corporate life cycle an important factor in management's decisions about real activities management (RAM)? In this study, we empirically investigate firms' RAM activities across the corporate life cycle, given the various costs and constraints associated with the alternative earnings management mechanisms across the life cycle stages. We examine both an aggregate RAM proxy and individual RAM proxies including operating and investing RAM such as sales, expenses, and production cost management, and sales of long-term assets. Employing the Dickinson (2011) proxy of corporate life cycle and Taiwanese data, we document that at the aggregate level, firms in the decline stage are more likely than mature firms to manage earnings upward with RAM. Using the individual RAM proxies, we find that firms in the early life cycle stages prefer sales management to the other RAM mechanisms, especially expenses management. Decline firms employ more sales and production cost management and investing RAM but a similar level of expenses management relative to mature firms. We further find that family firms in the introduction and decline stages engage in more RAM than mature family firms while nonfamily firms do not. Overall, our results indicate that firms prefer different RAM mechanisms across the life cycle stages, that these preferences differ between family and non-family firms, and that these preferences are stronger in family firms. The results are robust after using alternative proxies of operating RAM and additional control variables of corporate governance. Our findings are of interest to investors, auditors, regulators, and academics concerning financial reporting quality and financial statement analysis.

企业生命周期、家族企业与盈余管理:来自台湾的证据
企业生命周期是管理层关于实际活动管理(RAM)决策的一个重要因素吗?在本研究中,我们对公司整个生命周期的RAM活动进行了实证研究,并考虑了与整个生命周期阶段的替代盈余管理机制相关的各种成本和约束。我们研究了总RAM代理和单个RAM代理,包括运营和投资RAM,如销售、费用和生产成本管理,以及长期资产的销售。采用Dickinson(2011)的企业生命周期代理和台湾数据,我们证明在总体水平上,处于衰退阶段的企业比成熟企业更有可能通过RAM来管理向上的收益。使用单个RAM代理,我们发现处于生命周期早期阶段的公司更喜欢销售管理而不是其他RAM机制,特别是费用管理。衰退企业采用更多的销售和生产成本管理和投资RAM,但费用管理水平与成熟企业相似。我们进一步发现,在引入和衰退阶段的家族企业比成熟的家族企业投入更多的RAM,而非家族企业则没有。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,企业在不同的生命周期阶段偏好不同的RAM机制,这些偏好在家族企业和非家族企业之间存在差异,并且这些偏好在家族企业中更强。在使用运营RAM替代代理和公司治理的附加控制变量后,结果具有鲁棒性。我们的研究结果对投资者、审计师、监管机构和有关财务报告质量和财务报表分析的学者都很有兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Accounting
Advances in Accounting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting continues to provide an important international forum for discourse among and between academic and practicing accountants on the issues of significance. Emphasis continues to be placed on original commentary, critical analysis and creative research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信