Alongside desire: Object Lessons and Working-Class Studies

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Matt Brim
{"title":"Alongside desire: Object Lessons and Working-Class Studies","authors":"Matt Brim","doi":"10.1177/14647001221143031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconsiders Robyn Wiegman’s Object Lessons (2012) as a book that helps to discern a necessary relation between Queer Studies and Working-Class Studies, two fields that do not often share a footprint in the US academy. That relation emerges for the author in the unexpected resonance between Object Lessons and Vivian Gornick’s recently republished The Romance of American Communism (2020), a classic text about the politics of passionate longing for a better world. Likewise, Wiegman understands political desire as the animating force behind the field of Queer Studies and other identity knowledges. Brim argues that, alongside this affective threshold of belonging that constitutes the field of US Queer Studies, there exists a material threshold of belonging that renders politically indispensable academic fields as, nonetheless, sites of class-based exclusion. In the increasingly class-stratified and race-sorted academy, disciplines such as Working-Class Studies that are attentive to the material exclusions of knowledge production can help scholars to proactively set material conditions alongside political desire in a future-oriented, sustainable vision of Queer Studies.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"24 1","pages":"285 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221143031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reconsiders Robyn Wiegman’s Object Lessons (2012) as a book that helps to discern a necessary relation between Queer Studies and Working-Class Studies, two fields that do not often share a footprint in the US academy. That relation emerges for the author in the unexpected resonance between Object Lessons and Vivian Gornick’s recently republished The Romance of American Communism (2020), a classic text about the politics of passionate longing for a better world. Likewise, Wiegman understands political desire as the animating force behind the field of Queer Studies and other identity knowledges. Brim argues that, alongside this affective threshold of belonging that constitutes the field of US Queer Studies, there exists a material threshold of belonging that renders politically indispensable academic fields as, nonetheless, sites of class-based exclusion. In the increasingly class-stratified and race-sorted academy, disciplines such as Working-Class Studies that are attentive to the material exclusions of knowledge production can help scholars to proactively set material conditions alongside political desire in a future-oriented, sustainable vision of Queer Studies.
欲望的同时:对象课程与工人阶级研究
本文将罗宾·维格曼(Robyn Wiegman)的《对象课程》(Object Lessons, 2012)重新视为一本有助于辨析酷儿研究和工人阶级研究之间必要关系的书,这两个领域在美国学术界并不常见。这种关系出现在作者与薇薇安·戈尔尼克(Vivian Gornick)最近再版的《美国共产主义浪漫》(the Romance of American Communism, 2020)之间意想不到的共鸣中。《美国共产主义浪漫》是一部关于对更美好世界充满激情的政治渴望的经典作品。同样,维格曼认为政治欲望是酷儿研究领域和其他身份知识背后的动力。Brim认为,除了构成美国酷儿研究领域的情感归属门槛之外,还存在一个物质归属门槛,使政治上不可或缺的学术领域成为基于阶级的排斥场所。在日益阶级分层和种族分类的学术界,像工人阶级研究这样的学科,关注知识生产的物质排斥,可以帮助学者在面向未来的、可持续的酷儿研究愿景中,积极地设定物质条件和政治愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信