Message framing effects on sustainable consumer behaviour: a systematic review and future research directions for social marketing

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Emma Shaozhen Florence, D. Fleischman, R. Mulcahy, M. Wynder
{"title":"Message framing effects on sustainable consumer behaviour: a systematic review and future research directions for social marketing","authors":"Emma Shaozhen Florence, D. Fleischman, R. Mulcahy, M. Wynder","doi":"10.1108/jsocm-09-2021-0221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this research is to provide a systematic review of the literature relating to message framing and its effectiveness in persuading consumers to adopt environmentally sustainable behaviour, which is a form of pro-social behaviour. Specifically, this paper focuses on three types of message framing: positive–negative, self–other and abstract–concrete.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper reports on a systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework identifying 108 articles published relating to message framing and environmental sustainability between 2005 and 2020. Descriptive analysis of the data was undertaken in combination with a thematic approach.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results demonstrate that single frames do not reliably increase sustainable consumer behaviour. Instead, the use of two message frames is more consistently effective. However, there is some disparity in relation to the combined effects of two message frames. The research also identifies that the use of three combined message frames is underexplored in the existing literature.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nSocial marketing and consumer psychology researchers have explored many types of message framing. This study focuses on three common types. Also, the review is limited to valence framing. The authors recognise that visual aspects of message frames also determine the effectiveness of messaging. Another limitation is that only empirical studies published between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPast review papers related to the impact of messaging on sustainable consumer behaviour either focus on one type of message framing, such as the positive–negative frame, or did not categorise message framing into different types. The current review focuses on three types of message framing that have been examined separately and in combination in the literature. Based on the findings, this study proposes a synthesised theoretical framework for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":51732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-09-2021-0221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research is to provide a systematic review of the literature relating to message framing and its effectiveness in persuading consumers to adopt environmentally sustainable behaviour, which is a form of pro-social behaviour. Specifically, this paper focuses on three types of message framing: positive–negative, self–other and abstract–concrete. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports on a systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework identifying 108 articles published relating to message framing and environmental sustainability between 2005 and 2020. Descriptive analysis of the data was undertaken in combination with a thematic approach. Findings The results demonstrate that single frames do not reliably increase sustainable consumer behaviour. Instead, the use of two message frames is more consistently effective. However, there is some disparity in relation to the combined effects of two message frames. The research also identifies that the use of three combined message frames is underexplored in the existing literature. Research limitations/implications Social marketing and consumer psychology researchers have explored many types of message framing. This study focuses on three common types. Also, the review is limited to valence framing. The authors recognise that visual aspects of message frames also determine the effectiveness of messaging. Another limitation is that only empirical studies published between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. Originality/value Past review papers related to the impact of messaging on sustainable consumer behaviour either focus on one type of message framing, such as the positive–negative frame, or did not categorise message framing into different types. The current review focuses on three types of message framing that have been examined separately and in combination in the literature. Based on the findings, this study proposes a synthesised theoretical framework for future research.
信息框架对可持续消费行为的影响:社会营销的系统回顾与未来研究方向
本研究的目的是对信息框架及其在说服消费者采用环境可持续行为方面的有效性的文献进行系统回顾,这是一种亲社会行为。具体而言,本文重点研究了三种类型的信息框架:积极-消极、自我-他者和抽象-具体。设计/方法/方法本文报告了在系统评价和荟萃分析框架的首选报告项目指导下的系统评价,确定了2005年至2020年间发表的108篇与信息框架和环境可持续性相关的文章。结合专题方法对数据进行了描述性分析。研究结果表明,单一框架并不能可靠地增加可持续的消费者行为。相反,使用两个消息框架更加一致有效。然而,在两个消息框架的综合效果方面存在一些差异。该研究还指出,在现有文献中,三种组合消息框架的使用尚未得到充分探索。研究局限/启示社会营销和消费者心理学研究者已经探索了许多类型的信息框架。本研究主要关注三种常见类型。同时,本研究仅限于效价框架。作者认识到消息框架的可视化方面也决定了消息传递的有效性。另一个限制是,只审查了2005年至2020年之间发表的实证研究。独创性/价值过去关于信息传递对可持续消费者行为影响的综述论文要么关注于一种类型的信息框架,如积极-消极框架,要么没有将信息框架分类为不同类型。目前的审查侧重于三种类型的信息框架,已分别检查和组合在文献中。在此基础上,本研究为未来的研究提出了一个综合的理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
29.20%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信