Introduction to the Special Issue: Teaching Apocalypse, Now

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Graham Cassano, Barbara Gurr, Melissa F. Lavin, Christine Zozula
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Teaching Apocalypse, Now","authors":"Graham Cassano, Barbara Gurr, Melissa F. Lavin, Christine Zozula","doi":"10.1177/0092055x221120866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past few years have been particularly turbulent ones socially, economically, and politically in the United States and around the world. Helping our students critically analyze the causes and effects of racial injustice, misogyny (including transphobia, homophobia, and restrictions on reproductive health care), and wealth gaps has long been part of the purview of a sociological education, and recently our classrooms have increasingly become spaces in which to consider militarism and war, a global pandemic, the deepening integration of technology into our lives, and the steep rise of authoritarianism both in the United States and elsewhere. Of course, added to this are the profound urgency of climate change and its undeniable impacts on our world. We are, many might argue, living in a dystopia. Or a horror film. Certainly, an apocalypse. All these terms—“dystopia,” “horror,” and “apocalypse”—are relative to history, race, gender, sexuality, dis/ability, and income, among other social factors. Certainly, the middle passage of the trans-Atlantic slave trade was horror; certainly, the genocide of Native Americans was apocalyptic and their continued survival a lesson in the postapocalypse. Just as certainly, the rash of antitransgender laws and the steep rise in forced-birth laws in recent years can be understood as dystopic, as can the COVID-19 global pandemic, the unremitting presence of (and reliance on) technology in our world, and the January 6, 2021, uprising against the U.S. presidential election. All of these and more can also be understood as signs or warnings of the future, particularly for sociologists who also study history. However, history and sociology are not the only fields that can help us—and help our students—understand the world around us. The stories we tell about these phenomena, particularly in literature and televisually (through TV and film), whether fiction or nonfiction, also offer important insights for the sociological imagination, perhaps even a checklist of conditions or a training manual for the future. We noted in our initial call for papers published in volume 49, issue 1 of Teaching Sociology in 2021 that “the salience of such narratives is (domestically and globally) acute”; the months since have only increased this urgency. In this special issue of Teaching Sociology, we consider what is to be gained by the use of horror, dystopia, and postapocalyptic stories in the sociology classroom. We take a transdisciplinary approach to sociology in considering the use of genre-specific tools, including popular media with which many students already have a familiarity, to encourage critical analysis of the social conditions that lead to and derive from conditions of unrest, disparity, injustice, and social change. Contributors offer insights into how certain stories can be used sociologically and also how students might negotiate social meanings through familiar media. However, contributors to this issue go beyond a mere defense of horror, dystopia, and the postapocalypse in the sociology classroom to detail their successes and failures in working with students through this transand interdisciplinary approach, providing readers with detailed and thoughtful roadmaps for future application. For example, Randall Wyatt’s examination of white supremacy and anti-Blackness in the critically acclaimed television show Lovecraft Country provides a road map to a concise analysis of advanced sociological concepts. As Wyatt explains, Lovecraft Country’s in-depth and intersectional reliance on Blackness, sexuality, and white supremacy as central story mechanisms (rather than incidental or plot devices) offers students a familiar entrance into considering these social structures but, importantly, also offers students an opportunity to apply these concepts to the work of W. E. B. Du Bois and Frantz Fanon and, in turn, to apply the 1120866 TSOXXX10.1177/0092055X221120866Teaching SociologyEditorial editorial2022","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":"50 1","pages":"305 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x221120866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past few years have been particularly turbulent ones socially, economically, and politically in the United States and around the world. Helping our students critically analyze the causes and effects of racial injustice, misogyny (including transphobia, homophobia, and restrictions on reproductive health care), and wealth gaps has long been part of the purview of a sociological education, and recently our classrooms have increasingly become spaces in which to consider militarism and war, a global pandemic, the deepening integration of technology into our lives, and the steep rise of authoritarianism both in the United States and elsewhere. Of course, added to this are the profound urgency of climate change and its undeniable impacts on our world. We are, many might argue, living in a dystopia. Or a horror film. Certainly, an apocalypse. All these terms—“dystopia,” “horror,” and “apocalypse”—are relative to history, race, gender, sexuality, dis/ability, and income, among other social factors. Certainly, the middle passage of the trans-Atlantic slave trade was horror; certainly, the genocide of Native Americans was apocalyptic and their continued survival a lesson in the postapocalypse. Just as certainly, the rash of antitransgender laws and the steep rise in forced-birth laws in recent years can be understood as dystopic, as can the COVID-19 global pandemic, the unremitting presence of (and reliance on) technology in our world, and the January 6, 2021, uprising against the U.S. presidential election. All of these and more can also be understood as signs or warnings of the future, particularly for sociologists who also study history. However, history and sociology are not the only fields that can help us—and help our students—understand the world around us. The stories we tell about these phenomena, particularly in literature and televisually (through TV and film), whether fiction or nonfiction, also offer important insights for the sociological imagination, perhaps even a checklist of conditions or a training manual for the future. We noted in our initial call for papers published in volume 49, issue 1 of Teaching Sociology in 2021 that “the salience of such narratives is (domestically and globally) acute”; the months since have only increased this urgency. In this special issue of Teaching Sociology, we consider what is to be gained by the use of horror, dystopia, and postapocalyptic stories in the sociology classroom. We take a transdisciplinary approach to sociology in considering the use of genre-specific tools, including popular media with which many students already have a familiarity, to encourage critical analysis of the social conditions that lead to and derive from conditions of unrest, disparity, injustice, and social change. Contributors offer insights into how certain stories can be used sociologically and also how students might negotiate social meanings through familiar media. However, contributors to this issue go beyond a mere defense of horror, dystopia, and the postapocalypse in the sociology classroom to detail their successes and failures in working with students through this transand interdisciplinary approach, providing readers with detailed and thoughtful roadmaps for future application. For example, Randall Wyatt’s examination of white supremacy and anti-Blackness in the critically acclaimed television show Lovecraft Country provides a road map to a concise analysis of advanced sociological concepts. As Wyatt explains, Lovecraft Country’s in-depth and intersectional reliance on Blackness, sexuality, and white supremacy as central story mechanisms (rather than incidental or plot devices) offers students a familiar entrance into considering these social structures but, importantly, also offers students an opportunity to apply these concepts to the work of W. E. B. Du Bois and Frantz Fanon and, in turn, to apply the 1120866 TSOXXX10.1177/0092055X221120866Teaching SociologyEditorial editorial2022
特刊导言:教学启示录,现在
在过去的几年里,美国和世界各地的社会、经济和政治都特别动荡。长期以来,帮助我们的学生批判性地分析种族不公正、厌女症(包括对变性人的恐惧、对同性恋的恐惧和对生殖保健的限制)和贫富差距的原因和影响,一直是社会学教育的一部分。最近,我们的教室越来越成为考虑军国主义和战争、全球流行病、技术日益融入我们生活的空间,以及威权主义在美国和其他地方的急剧崛起。当然,除此之外还有气候变化的深刻紧迫性及其对我们世界的不可否认的影响。许多人可能会说,我们生活在一个反乌托邦中。或者是一部恐怖电影。当然是天启。所有这些术语——“反乌托邦”、“恐怖”和“天启”——都与历史、种族、性别、性、残疾/能力、收入以及其他社会因素有关。当然,跨大西洋奴隶贸易的中间通道是可怕的;当然,对印第安人的种族灭绝是世界末日,他们的持续生存是后世界末日的一个教训。同样可以肯定的是,近年来,反跨性别法律的涌现和强制生育法律的急剧增加可以被理解为反乌托邦,COVID-19全球大流行、我们世界对技术的不懈存在(和依赖)以及2021年1月6日针对美国总统大选的起义也可以被理解为反乌托邦。所有这些以及更多的事情也可以被理解为未来的迹象或警告,特别是对也研究历史的社会学家来说。然而,历史和社会学并不是唯一能帮助我们——以及帮助我们的学生——理解我们周围世界的领域。我们所讲述的关于这些现象的故事,特别是在文学和电视(通过电视和电影)中,无论是小说还是非小说,也为社会学想象力提供了重要的见解,甚至可能是一份条件清单或未来的培训手册。我们在2021年《教学社会学》第49卷第1期的最初征稿中指出,“这种叙事的突出性(在国内和全球)是尖锐的”;此后的几个月只会增加这种紧迫性。在本期《教学社会学》的特刊中,我们将探讨在社会学课堂上使用恐怖、反乌托邦和后启示录故事的好处。我们采用跨学科的社会学方法,考虑使用特定类型的工具,包括许多学生已经熟悉的流行媒体,以鼓励对导致和衍生动荡,不平等,不公正和社会变化的社会条件进行批判性分析。作者提供了关于某些故事如何在社会学上被使用的见解,以及学生如何通过熟悉的媒体来协商社会意义。然而,本刊的作者不仅仅是在社会学课堂上为恐怖、反乌托邦和后启示录辩护,而是详细介绍了他们通过跨学科方法与学生合作的成功和失败,为读者提供了详细而周到的路线图,以供未来应用。例如,兰德尔·怀亚特在广受好评的电视节目《洛夫克拉夫特之乡》中对白人至上主义和反黑人的审视,为简明分析先进的社会学概念提供了路线图。正如怀亚特所解释的那样,《洛夫克拉夫特之国》对黑人、性和白人至上作为中心故事机制(而不是偶然事件或情节装置)的深入和交叉依赖为学生提供了一个熟悉的入口来考虑这些社会结构,但重要的是,也为学生提供了一个将这些概念应用于W. E. B.杜波依斯和弗朗茨·法农的作品的机会,反过来,申请1120866 tsoxxx10 .1177/ 0092055x221120866《教学社会学》杂志社论号2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信