Effects of design consistency measures and roadside hazard types on run-off-road crash severity: Application of random parameters hierarchical ordered probit model

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shinthia Azmeri Khan , Shamsunnahar Yasmin , Md Mazharul Haque
{"title":"Effects of design consistency measures and roadside hazard types on run-off-road crash severity: Application of random parameters hierarchical ordered probit model","authors":"Shinthia Azmeri Khan ,&nbsp;Shamsunnahar Yasmin ,&nbsp;Md Mazharul Haque","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2023.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Run-off-road crashes are one of the most significant causes of road deaths worldwide. Given such significant safety concerns, a number of earlier studies examined the critical factors contributing towards run-off-road crash severity outcomes, mostly by using the information compiled in the official crash database. However, the official crash databases are less likely to have detailed information on driver behavior (errors/expectations) and roadway environment (roadway geometry and roadside attributes). This study aims to investigate the effects of design consistency measures on run-off-road crash severity mechanisms by applying a random parameters hierarchical ordered Probit model. This study contributes towards existing safety literature by demonstrating a complementary approach to capturing the effects of driver behavior and heterogeneity in roadway environment on run-off-road crash severity outcome through the composite measures of design consistency indices and cosmopolite measures of roadside hazard type variables. Specifically, 17 different functional forms of design consistency indices are developed to capture the behavioral factors from the road-geometric changes in developing run-off-road crash severity models. Further, in examining the effect of different types of the roadside environment on run-off-road crash severity outcomes, seven roadside hazard type variables are generated as a composite function of roadside object type and clear zone (lateral distance to roadside object). The empirical analysis of this study involves a two-step modelling approach - in the first step, the decision tree algorithm is applied to identify the higher-order interaction among independent variables, and in the second step, crash severity models are developed by employing several econometric approaches. The hybrid models are estimated by employing four econometric frameworks, which include Ordered Probit, Hierarchical Ordered Probit, Random Parameters Ordered Probit, and Random parameters Hierarchical Ordered Probit models. The run-off-road crash severity models are estimated by using crash data collected from the State of Queensland, Australia, for the years 2015 through 2019. Overall, this study reveals the importance of considering the interaction of drivers' behavior, road geometry, and roadside attributes along with other independent variables in developing run-off-road crash severity models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213665723000350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Run-off-road crashes are one of the most significant causes of road deaths worldwide. Given such significant safety concerns, a number of earlier studies examined the critical factors contributing towards run-off-road crash severity outcomes, mostly by using the information compiled in the official crash database. However, the official crash databases are less likely to have detailed information on driver behavior (errors/expectations) and roadway environment (roadway geometry and roadside attributes). This study aims to investigate the effects of design consistency measures on run-off-road crash severity mechanisms by applying a random parameters hierarchical ordered Probit model. This study contributes towards existing safety literature by demonstrating a complementary approach to capturing the effects of driver behavior and heterogeneity in roadway environment on run-off-road crash severity outcome through the composite measures of design consistency indices and cosmopolite measures of roadside hazard type variables. Specifically, 17 different functional forms of design consistency indices are developed to capture the behavioral factors from the road-geometric changes in developing run-off-road crash severity models. Further, in examining the effect of different types of the roadside environment on run-off-road crash severity outcomes, seven roadside hazard type variables are generated as a composite function of roadside object type and clear zone (lateral distance to roadside object). The empirical analysis of this study involves a two-step modelling approach - in the first step, the decision tree algorithm is applied to identify the higher-order interaction among independent variables, and in the second step, crash severity models are developed by employing several econometric approaches. The hybrid models are estimated by employing four econometric frameworks, which include Ordered Probit, Hierarchical Ordered Probit, Random Parameters Ordered Probit, and Random parameters Hierarchical Ordered Probit models. The run-off-road crash severity models are estimated by using crash data collected from the State of Queensland, Australia, for the years 2015 through 2019. Overall, this study reveals the importance of considering the interaction of drivers' behavior, road geometry, and roadside attributes along with other independent variables in developing run-off-road crash severity models.

设计一致性措施和路边危险类型对失控道路碰撞严重程度的影响:随机参数层次有序Probit模型的应用
越野车碰撞是全世界道路死亡的最重要原因之一。考虑到这些重大的安全问题,一些早期的研究主要是通过使用官方碰撞数据库中汇编的信息来检查导致越野跑碰撞严重后果的关键因素。然而,官方碰撞数据库不太可能包含驾驶员行为(错误/期望)和道路环境(道路几何形状和路边属性)的详细信息。本研究采用随机参数分层有序Probit模型,探讨设计一致性措施对越野车碰撞严重程度机制的影响。本研究通过展示一种互补的方法,通过设计一致性指数和路边危险类型变量的世界尺度的复合措施,捕捉驾驶员行为和道路环境异质性对越野车碰撞严重程度结果的影响,从而对现有的安全文献做出了贡献。具体而言,本文提出了17种不同的设计一致性指标的功能形式,以便在开发越野跑碰撞严重程度模型时从道路几何变化中捕捉行为因素。此外,为了研究不同类型的路边环境对越野车碰撞严重程度结果的影响,我们生成了7个路边危险类型变量,作为路边物体类型和清晰区(到路边物体的横向距离)的复合函数。本研究的实证分析涉及两步建模方法——第一步,采用决策树算法识别自变量之间的高阶相互作用,第二步,采用几种计量经济学方法建立碰撞严重性模型。采用有序Probit模型、分层有序Probit模型、随机参数有序Probit模型和随机参数分层有序Probit模型四种计量经济学框架对混合模型进行了估计。越野跑碰撞严重程度模型是通过使用从澳大利亚昆士兰州收集的2015年至2019年的碰撞数据来估计的。总体而言,本研究揭示了在开发越野车碰撞严重程度模型时,考虑驾驶员行为、道路几何形状、道路属性以及其他自变量的相互作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
34.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信