Out of pocket payment, affordability and availability of essential medicines in Africa: systematic review

G. Asmamaw, Dinksew Tewuhibo, Nardos Asffaw
{"title":"Out of pocket payment, affordability and availability of essential medicines in Africa: systematic review","authors":"G. Asmamaw, Dinksew Tewuhibo, Nardos Asffaw","doi":"10.15406/JAPLR.2021.10.00366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Availability and affordability of medicines are key determinants of universal health coverage, yet achieving them presents a major challenge especially in low-income countries. This study aims to overview the evidence on the accessibility of essential medicines in the African continent. Methods: A quantitative literature search published in English since 2014 was held from valid databases; such as, Scholar, Economic Literature, Global Health, PAIS International, and African Index Medicus. The search was erperformed from September 16 to 20, 2019. Two authors (G.A and D.T) screened the titles, reviewed the articles for inclusion, extracted the data, and conducted a quality assessment of the literature. The third author (N.A) commented on the review. We have used the universal definition of OOP, availability, and affordability. Results: Of 34, 06 articles initially identified, 19 were eligible for inclusion. These were cross-sectional and case-control household and health facility studies published in 2014 in Africa. They demonstrated that the availability of some essential medicine (antibiotics) >80% met WHO’s target. However, drugs for non-communicable diseases show unavailable that range within 20.1% to 60.8%. Households access health services mainly through OOP. An item patients’ expense more for, was fees for drugs (62.3%) (Congo) and was an expensive component of expenditure in private and public health facilities with a mean of 16.7USD and 25.5USD, respectively (Burkina-Faso). Drugs for non-communicable diseases were the most expensive than drugs for infectious diseases (median = 0.62 USD) (Ethiopia). The majority of core essential medicines in private and public outlets are unaffordable. There was a considerable variation in the affordability of basic treatment for infectious and non-communicable diseases. Interestingly, the potential source of inadequate availability of essential medicines and the presence of unaffordability was not investigated in Africa. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that even though, African countries show progress in coverage and affordability for some core essential medicines, it tills needs an effort to convey the WHO’s goal particularly for drugs of non-communicable disease. Future studies need to explore reasons for the persistent unavailability, unaffordability as well as high OOPs for medicines.","PeriodicalId":92063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical & pharmaceutical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical & pharmaceutical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JAPLR.2021.10.00366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Availability and affordability of medicines are key determinants of universal health coverage, yet achieving them presents a major challenge especially in low-income countries. This study aims to overview the evidence on the accessibility of essential medicines in the African continent. Methods: A quantitative literature search published in English since 2014 was held from valid databases; such as, Scholar, Economic Literature, Global Health, PAIS International, and African Index Medicus. The search was erperformed from September 16 to 20, 2019. Two authors (G.A and D.T) screened the titles, reviewed the articles for inclusion, extracted the data, and conducted a quality assessment of the literature. The third author (N.A) commented on the review. We have used the universal definition of OOP, availability, and affordability. Results: Of 34, 06 articles initially identified, 19 were eligible for inclusion. These were cross-sectional and case-control household and health facility studies published in 2014 in Africa. They demonstrated that the availability of some essential medicine (antibiotics) >80% met WHO’s target. However, drugs for non-communicable diseases show unavailable that range within 20.1% to 60.8%. Households access health services mainly through OOP. An item patients’ expense more for, was fees for drugs (62.3%) (Congo) and was an expensive component of expenditure in private and public health facilities with a mean of 16.7USD and 25.5USD, respectively (Burkina-Faso). Drugs for non-communicable diseases were the most expensive than drugs for infectious diseases (median = 0.62 USD) (Ethiopia). The majority of core essential medicines in private and public outlets are unaffordable. There was a considerable variation in the affordability of basic treatment for infectious and non-communicable diseases. Interestingly, the potential source of inadequate availability of essential medicines and the presence of unaffordability was not investigated in Africa. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that even though, African countries show progress in coverage and affordability for some core essential medicines, it tills needs an effort to convey the WHO’s goal particularly for drugs of non-communicable disease. Future studies need to explore reasons for the persistent unavailability, unaffordability as well as high OOPs for medicines.
非洲基本药物的自付支付、可负担性和可获得性:系统审查
背景:药品的可获得性和可负担性是全民健康覆盖的关键决定因素,但实现这一目标是一项重大挑战,尤其是在低收入国家。本研究旨在概述非洲大陆基本药物可及性的证据。方法:从有效数据库中检索自2014年以来以英文发表的定量文献;如学者、经济文献、全球健康、PAIS国际和非洲医学指数。搜索于2019年9月16日至20日进行。两位作者(G.A和D.T)筛选了标题,审查了纳入的文章,提取了数据,并对文献进行了质量评估。第三位作者(N.A)对该评论发表了评论。我们使用了OOP、可用性和可负担性的通用定义。结果:在3406篇最初确定的文章中,19篇符合入选条件。这些是2014年在非洲发表的横断面和病例对照家庭和卫生设施研究。他们证明,一些基本药物(抗生素)的供应量超过80%,达到了世界卫生组织的目标。然而,治疗非传染性疾病的药物不可用,这一比例在20.1%至60.8%之间。家庭主要通过OOP获得医疗服务。患者支出较多的一个项目是药品费(62.3%)(刚果),是私人和公共卫生设施支出的一个昂贵组成部分,平均值分别为16.7美元和25.5美元(布基纳法索)。非传染性疾病药物比传染性疾病药物最贵(中位数=0.62美元)(埃塞俄比亚)。私人和公共渠道的大多数核心基本药物都负担不起。传染病和非传染病基本治疗的负担能力差异很大。有趣的是,非洲没有调查基本药物供应不足和负担不起的潜在来源。结论:有证据表明,尽管非洲国家在一些核心基本药物的覆盖率和可负担性方面取得了进展,但仍需要努力传达世界卫生组织的目标,特别是非传染性疾病药物的目标。未来的研究需要探索药物持续不可用、负担不起以及OOP高的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信