Towards automatic cartilage quantification in clinical trials – Continuing from the 2019 IWOAI knee segmentation challenge

Erik B Dam , Arjun D Desai , Cem M Deniz , Haresh R Rajamohan , Ravinder Regatte , Claudia Iriondo , Valentina Pedoia , Sharmila Majumdar , Mathias Perslev , Christian Igel , Akshay Pai , Sibaji Gaj , Mingrui Yang , Kunio Nakamura , Xiaojuan Li , Hasan Maqbool , Ismail Irmakci , Sang-Eun Song , Ulas Bagci , Brian Hargreaves , Akshay Chaudhari
{"title":"Towards automatic cartilage quantification in clinical trials – Continuing from the 2019 IWOAI knee segmentation challenge","authors":"Erik B Dam ,&nbsp;Arjun D Desai ,&nbsp;Cem M Deniz ,&nbsp;Haresh R Rajamohan ,&nbsp;Ravinder Regatte ,&nbsp;Claudia Iriondo ,&nbsp;Valentina Pedoia ,&nbsp;Sharmila Majumdar ,&nbsp;Mathias Perslev ,&nbsp;Christian Igel ,&nbsp;Akshay Pai ,&nbsp;Sibaji Gaj ,&nbsp;Mingrui Yang ,&nbsp;Kunio Nakamura ,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Li ,&nbsp;Hasan Maqbool ,&nbsp;Ismail Irmakci ,&nbsp;Sang-Eun Song ,&nbsp;Ulas Bagci ,&nbsp;Brian Hargreaves ,&nbsp;Akshay Chaudhari","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2023.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether the deep learning (DL) segmentation methods from the six teams that participated in the IWOAI 2019 Knee Cartilage Segmentation Challenge are appropriate for quantifying cartilage loss in longitudinal clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We included 556 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative study with manually read cartilage volume scores for the baseline and 1-year visits. The teams used their methods originally trained for the IWOAI 2019 challenge to segment the 1130 knee MRIs. These scans were anonymized and the teams were blinded to any subject or visit identifiers. Two teams also submitted updated methods. The resulting 9,040 segmentations are available online.</p><p>The segmentations included tibial, femoral, and patellar compartments. In post-processing, we extracted medial and lateral tibial compartments and geometrically defined central medial and lateral femoral sub-compartments. The primary study outcome was the sensitivity to measure cartilage loss as defined by the standardized response mean (SRM).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the tibial compartments, several of the DL segmentation methods had SRMs similar to the gold standard manual method. The highest DL SRM was for the lateral tibial compartment at 0.38 (the gold standard had 0.34). For the femoral compartments, the gold standard had higher SRMs than the automatic methods at 0.31/0.30 for medial/lateral compartments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The lower SRMs for the DL methods in the femoral compartments at 0.2 were possibly due to the simple sub-compartment extraction done during post-processing. The study demonstrated that state-of-the-art DL segmentation methods may be used in standardized longitudinal single-scanner clinical trials for well-defined cartilage compartments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654123000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate whether the deep learning (DL) segmentation methods from the six teams that participated in the IWOAI 2019 Knee Cartilage Segmentation Challenge are appropriate for quantifying cartilage loss in longitudinal clinical trials.

Design

We included 556 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative study with manually read cartilage volume scores for the baseline and 1-year visits. The teams used their methods originally trained for the IWOAI 2019 challenge to segment the 1130 knee MRIs. These scans were anonymized and the teams were blinded to any subject or visit identifiers. Two teams also submitted updated methods. The resulting 9,040 segmentations are available online.

The segmentations included tibial, femoral, and patellar compartments. In post-processing, we extracted medial and lateral tibial compartments and geometrically defined central medial and lateral femoral sub-compartments. The primary study outcome was the sensitivity to measure cartilage loss as defined by the standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

For the tibial compartments, several of the DL segmentation methods had SRMs similar to the gold standard manual method. The highest DL SRM was for the lateral tibial compartment at 0.38 (the gold standard had 0.34). For the femoral compartments, the gold standard had higher SRMs than the automatic methods at 0.31/0.30 for medial/lateral compartments.

Conclusion

The lower SRMs for the DL methods in the femoral compartments at 0.2 were possibly due to the simple sub-compartment extraction done during post-processing. The study demonstrated that state-of-the-art DL segmentation methods may be used in standardized longitudinal single-scanner clinical trials for well-defined cartilage compartments.

在临床试验中实现自动软骨量化——继续2019年IWOAI膝关节分割挑战
目的评价参加IWOAI 2019膝关节软骨分割挑战赛的6个团队的深度学习(DL)分割方法是否适用于纵向临床试验中软骨损失的量化。设计:我们纳入了来自骨关节炎倡议研究的556名受试者,并对基线和1年随访进行了手工读取软骨体积评分。这些团队使用他们最初为IWOAI 2019挑战训练的方法来分割1130个膝关节核磁共振成像。这些扫描是匿名的,团队对任何受试者或访问标识符都是不知情的。两个团队也提交了更新的方法。由此产生的9,040段可在线获取。节段包括胫骨、股骨和髌骨隔室。在后处理中,我们提取了胫骨内侧和外侧腔室,并以几何形状定义了中央内侧和外侧股亚腔室。主要研究结果是通过标准化反应平均值(SRM)来衡量软骨损失的敏感性。结果对于胫骨间室,几种深度分割方法的SRMs与金标准手工分割方法相似。胫骨外侧室DL SRM最高,为0.38(金标准为0.34)。对于股腔室,金标准比自动方法的SRMs更高,内侧/外侧腔室的SRMs为0.31/0.30。结论DL方法在股腔室的SRMs较低(0.2)可能是由于后处理时进行了简单的小腔室提取。该研究表明,最先进的深度学习分割方法可用于标准化纵向单扫描仪临床试验明确的软骨室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信