A novel approach to biological risk surveillance in occupational hygiene: A case study on the use of quantitative microbial risk assessment to determine occupational risks for wastewater treatment plants workers in Costa Rica

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eric Morales , Andrei Badilla , Pablo Rivera , Ernesto Alfaro , Erin M. Symonds , Kenia Barrantes , Clemens Ruepert , Jennifer Crowe , Luz Chacón
{"title":"A novel approach to biological risk surveillance in occupational hygiene: A case study on the use of quantitative microbial risk assessment to determine occupational risks for wastewater treatment plants workers in Costa Rica","authors":"Eric Morales ,&nbsp;Andrei Badilla ,&nbsp;Pablo Rivera ,&nbsp;Ernesto Alfaro ,&nbsp;Erin M. Symonds ,&nbsp;Kenia Barrantes ,&nbsp;Clemens Ruepert ,&nbsp;Jennifer Crowe ,&nbsp;Luz Chacón","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2023.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wastewater treatment is essential for preventing infectious diseases and water pollution. To perform this process, workers operate and maintain wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); thus, they are exposed to the many pathogens in domestic wastewater. Consequently, it is necessary assess occupational exposure to pathogens in WWTPs. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is an approach for estimating the risk posed by a specific pathogen which can be useful for occupational hygiene assessments of biological risk. In this study, we applied QMRA, informed by occupational field surveillance, to estimate the potential risk for WWTP workers. Furthermore, we used simulations to test additional control strategies such as personal protective equipment (PPE). The QMRA was conducted for three WWTPs in Costa Rica with data collected between May 2020 and May 2021. Observation in each workplace showed a need for more consistent application of risk reduction strategies in the work environment, especially in behavior, infrastructure, and use of appropriate PPE. <span><em>Cryptosporidium</em></span> sp., <span><em>Giardia</em></span><span> sp., norovirus, and enterovirus genus were measured and detected in the WWTPs, and the treatment performance was unsatisfactory. As a result, the total health disease burden was higher than the benchmark for drinking water recommended by WHO (1.00 × 10</span><sup>−6</sup> DALY per person per year) by between one and three magnitudes orders in all WWTPs for the three exposure scenarios (operation, maintenance, and visitors). The simulation demonstrated that using PPE could reduce the estimated disease burden by nearly two orders of magnitude. Still, this control measure did not reach a level below the benchmark risk (less than 1.00 × 10<sup>−6</sup> DALY per person per year) for the WWTP workers. This study highlights the importance of using PPE with other control measures, such as automation or barriers, to isolate exposure sources. However, this study employed an uncommon approach in occupational health and hygiene, which combined field inspections, survival analysis, and QMRA, using field surveillance to understand the occupational environment and potential exposure routes, which is crucial for hazard identification and risk assessment. In addition, exposure modeling and QMRA were used to simulate different control scenarios, providing a robust estimate of potential risks associated with occupational exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352223000178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wastewater treatment is essential for preventing infectious diseases and water pollution. To perform this process, workers operate and maintain wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); thus, they are exposed to the many pathogens in domestic wastewater. Consequently, it is necessary assess occupational exposure to pathogens in WWTPs. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is an approach for estimating the risk posed by a specific pathogen which can be useful for occupational hygiene assessments of biological risk. In this study, we applied QMRA, informed by occupational field surveillance, to estimate the potential risk for WWTP workers. Furthermore, we used simulations to test additional control strategies such as personal protective equipment (PPE). The QMRA was conducted for three WWTPs in Costa Rica with data collected between May 2020 and May 2021. Observation in each workplace showed a need for more consistent application of risk reduction strategies in the work environment, especially in behavior, infrastructure, and use of appropriate PPE. Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp., norovirus, and enterovirus genus were measured and detected in the WWTPs, and the treatment performance was unsatisfactory. As a result, the total health disease burden was higher than the benchmark for drinking water recommended by WHO (1.00 × 10−6 DALY per person per year) by between one and three magnitudes orders in all WWTPs for the three exposure scenarios (operation, maintenance, and visitors). The simulation demonstrated that using PPE could reduce the estimated disease burden by nearly two orders of magnitude. Still, this control measure did not reach a level below the benchmark risk (less than 1.00 × 10−6 DALY per person per year) for the WWTP workers. This study highlights the importance of using PPE with other control measures, such as automation or barriers, to isolate exposure sources. However, this study employed an uncommon approach in occupational health and hygiene, which combined field inspections, survival analysis, and QMRA, using field surveillance to understand the occupational environment and potential exposure routes, which is crucial for hazard identification and risk assessment. In addition, exposure modeling and QMRA were used to simulate different control scenarios, providing a robust estimate of potential risks associated with occupational exposure.

职业卫生生物风险监测的新方法:在哥斯达黎加使用定量微生物风险评估确定废水处理厂工人职业风险的案例研究
废水处理对于预防传染病和水污染至关重要。为了完成这个过程,工人操作和维护废水处理厂(WWTPs);因此,他们暴露在生活废水中的许多病原体中。因此,有必要评估污水处理厂中病原体的职业暴露。定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)是一种评估特定病原体构成的风险的方法,可用于职业卫生生物风险评估。在本研究中,我们运用QMRA,在职业现场监测的基础上,评估污水处理厂工人的潜在风险。此外,我们还使用模拟来测试其他控制策略,如个人防护装备(PPE)。QMRA是在哥斯达黎加的三个污水处理厂进行的,数据收集于2020年5月至2021年5月。对每个工作场所的观察表明,需要在工作环境中更加一致地应用降低风险战略,特别是在行为、基础设施和适当个人防护装备的使用方面。污水处理剂中检测到隐孢子虫、贾第鞭毛虫、诺如病毒和肠病毒属,处理效果不理想。结果,在三种暴露情景(操作、维护和访客)下,所有污水处理厂的总健康疾病负担比世卫组织推荐的饮用水基准(每人每年1.00 × 10−6 DALY)高出一到三个数量级。模拟结果表明,使用PPE可以将估计的疾病负担降低近两个数量级。尽管如此,这一控制措施并没有达到低于基准风险(低于1.00 × 10 - 6 DALY每人每年)的水平。这项研究强调了将个人防护装备与其他控制措施(如自动化或屏障)结合使用以隔离暴露源的重要性。然而,本研究采用了一种罕见的职业健康与卫生方法,将现场检查、生存分析和QMRA相结合,通过现场监测了解职业环境和潜在暴露途径,这对危害识别和风险评估至关重要。此外,暴露建模和QMRA用于模拟不同的控制情景,提供与职业暴露相关的潜在风险的稳健估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信