Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Search for the Optimal Biomarker

IF 3.4 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
SA Qureshi, N. Chan, Mridula A. George, S. Ganesan, D. Toppmeyer, C. Omene
{"title":"Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Search for the Optimal Biomarker","authors":"SA Qureshi, N. Chan, Mridula A. George, S. Ganesan, D. Toppmeyer, C. Omene","doi":"10.1177/11772719221078774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a high-risk and aggressive malignancy characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the surface of malignant cells, and by the lack of overexpression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). It has limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. There is now a growing body of evidence on the role of immunotherapy in TNBC, however much of the data from clinical trials is conflicting and thus, challenging for clinicians to integrate the data into clinical practice. Landmark phase III trials using immunotherapy in the early-stage neoadjuvant setting concluded that the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo while others found no significant improvement in pCR. Phase III trials have investigated the utility of immunotherapy in previously untreated metastatic TNBC, and these studies have similarly arrived at inconsistent conclusions. Some studies showed no benefit while others demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in overall survival in the PD-L1 positive population. It is not yet clear which biomarkers are most useful, and assays for these biomarkers have not been standardized. Given the often serious and severe side effects of immunotherapy, it is important and necessary to identify predictive biomarkers of response and resistance in order to enhance patient selection. In this review, we will discuss both the challenges of traditional biomarkers and the opportunities of emerging biomarkers for patient selection.","PeriodicalId":47060,"journal":{"name":"Biomarker Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarker Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719221078774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a high-risk and aggressive malignancy characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the surface of malignant cells, and by the lack of overexpression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). It has limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. There is now a growing body of evidence on the role of immunotherapy in TNBC, however much of the data from clinical trials is conflicting and thus, challenging for clinicians to integrate the data into clinical practice. Landmark phase III trials using immunotherapy in the early-stage neoadjuvant setting concluded that the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo while others found no significant improvement in pCR. Phase III trials have investigated the utility of immunotherapy in previously untreated metastatic TNBC, and these studies have similarly arrived at inconsistent conclusions. Some studies showed no benefit while others demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in overall survival in the PD-L1 positive population. It is not yet clear which biomarkers are most useful, and assays for these biomarkers have not been standardized. Given the often serious and severe side effects of immunotherapy, it is important and necessary to identify predictive biomarkers of response and resistance in order to enhance patient selection. In this review, we will discuss both the challenges of traditional biomarkers and the opportunities of emerging biomarkers for patient selection.
癌症三阴性患者的免疫检查点抑制剂:寻找最佳生物标志物
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种高风险、侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,其特征是恶性细胞表面缺乏雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR),并且缺乏人表皮生长因子2 (HER2)的过表达。与其他亚型乳腺癌相比,它的治疗选择有限。现在有越来越多的证据表明免疫治疗在TNBC中的作用,然而,临床试验的许多数据是相互矛盾的,因此,临床医生将这些数据整合到临床实践中是一项挑战。在早期新辅助治疗中使用免疫治疗的里程碑式III期试验得出结论,与安慰剂化疗相比,在化疗中添加免疫治疗可提高病理完全缓解率(pCR),而其他试验则发现pCR无显著改善。III期试验研究了免疫疗法对先前未治疗的转移性TNBC的效用,这些研究同样得出了不一致的结论。一些研究显示没有益处,而另一些研究显示PD-L1阳性人群的总生存率有临床显着改善。目前尚不清楚哪些生物标记物最有用,对这些生物标记物的测定也没有标准化。鉴于免疫治疗的严重副作用,确定反应和耐药的预测性生物标志物以增强患者选择是重要和必要的。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论传统生物标志物的挑战和新兴生物标志物在患者选择方面的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarker Insights
Biomarker Insights MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers all aspects of biomarker research and clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信