Decision-Making Process Of Corporate-Farming Innovation In Bantul Regency

Agro Ekonomi Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.22146/ae.61255
Alia Bihrajihant Raya, S. Fatonah, Ratih Ineke Wati, S. P. Wastutiningsih
{"title":"Decision-Making Process Of Corporate-Farming Innovation In Bantul Regency","authors":"Alia Bihrajihant Raya, S. Fatonah, Ratih Ineke Wati, S. P. Wastutiningsih","doi":"10.22146/ae.61255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate farming is an agricultural innovation to answer narrow land tenure problems due to widespread land conversion and land fragmentation. The principle of corporate farming is land consolidation with one joint management. This research attempts to determine the decision-making process for corporate farming innovation in Bantul Regency, using an exploratory approach with the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method and ego-centered network analysis. The ego in this study is the innovator and chairman of the corporate farming team. The results of the study were presented in a sociogram using Pajek software. The actors involved in the corporate farming innovation decision-making process are the head of farmer groups, administrators, team leaders, member farmers, Bantul Regency Agricultural Service, local extension agents, and stakeholders including the Research Team of the UGM Faculty of Agriculture, Bank Indonesia Regional DIY, and BPTP DIY. The introduction stage was carried out in a farmer group meeting, and the UGM Faculty of Agriculture Research Team acts as the innovator. It is followed by the persuasion stage, which explains the benefits of implementing corporate farming during subsequent farmer group meetings. The decision stage is indicated by providing direction, assistance, and financial support, which relied on group agreement to commit corporate farming. The farmer groups’ heads dominated the persuasion stage, the decision stage, and the implementation stage. The differences between corporate farming and individual farming lie in some aspects, such as working together rather than individual work, semi-organic cultivation systems, and optimizing the use of agricultural machinery. At the confirmation stage, 62% of informants disagree to continue corporate farming due to significant drops in production yields. The change in the cultivation system from chemical to semi-organic is one reason for the decline in production.Keywords: corporate farming, ego-centered network, decision-making process, social network analysis","PeriodicalId":33120,"journal":{"name":"Agro Ekonomi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro Ekonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.61255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Corporate farming is an agricultural innovation to answer narrow land tenure problems due to widespread land conversion and land fragmentation. The principle of corporate farming is land consolidation with one joint management. This research attempts to determine the decision-making process for corporate farming innovation in Bantul Regency, using an exploratory approach with the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method and ego-centered network analysis. The ego in this study is the innovator and chairman of the corporate farming team. The results of the study were presented in a sociogram using Pajek software. The actors involved in the corporate farming innovation decision-making process are the head of farmer groups, administrators, team leaders, member farmers, Bantul Regency Agricultural Service, local extension agents, and stakeholders including the Research Team of the UGM Faculty of Agriculture, Bank Indonesia Regional DIY, and BPTP DIY. The introduction stage was carried out in a farmer group meeting, and the UGM Faculty of Agriculture Research Team acts as the innovator. It is followed by the persuasion stage, which explains the benefits of implementing corporate farming during subsequent farmer group meetings. The decision stage is indicated by providing direction, assistance, and financial support, which relied on group agreement to commit corporate farming. The farmer groups’ heads dominated the persuasion stage, the decision stage, and the implementation stage. The differences between corporate farming and individual farming lie in some aspects, such as working together rather than individual work, semi-organic cultivation systems, and optimizing the use of agricultural machinery. At the confirmation stage, 62% of informants disagree to continue corporate farming due to significant drops in production yields. The change in the cultivation system from chemical to semi-organic is one reason for the decline in production.Keywords: corporate farming, ego-centered network, decision-making process, social network analysis
班图尔县企业农业创新的决策过程
公司化农业是一种农业创新,旨在解决由于广泛的土地流转和土地破碎化而导致的土地使用权狭窄的问题。公司化耕作的原则是土地整理统一经营。本研究采用社会网络分析(SNA)方法和自我中心网络分析的探索性方法,试图确定班图尔县企业农业创新的决策过程。本研究中的自我是企业农业团队的创新者和主席。研究结果用Pajek软件以社会关系图的形式呈现。参与企业农业创新决策过程的行为者包括农民团体的负责人、行政人员、团队领导、成员农民、班图尔县农业服务局、当地推广代理人和利益相关者,包括UGM农业学院研究团队、印度尼西亚银行区域DIY和BPTP DIY。引进阶段在农民小组会议上进行,UGM农业研究学院团队作为创新者。接下来是说服阶段,在随后的农民小组会议上解释实施企业农业的好处。决策阶段是通过提供指导、援助和财政支持来表示的,这依赖于集体协议来承诺企业农业。农民团体负责人在说服阶段、决策阶段和实施阶段占主导地位。公司制农业与个体农业的区别在于一些方面,如集体作业而非个体作业、半有机耕作制度、优化农业机械的使用等。在确认阶段,由于产量显著下降,62%的受访者不同意继续企业化养殖。从化学耕作到半有机耕作的转变是产量下降的原因之一。关键词:企业农业,自我中心网络,决策过程,社会网络分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信