‚Rückkehr in die Kindheit‘ oder ‚Tod bei lebendigem Leib‘? Ethische Aspekte der Altersdemenz in der Perspektive des Lebensverlaufs

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Mark Schweda, Karin Jongsma
{"title":"‚Rückkehr in die Kindheit‘ oder ‚Tod bei lebendigem Leib‘? Ethische Aspekte der Altersdemenz in der Perspektive des Lebensverlaufs","authors":"Mark Schweda, Karin Jongsma","doi":"10.22613/ZFPP/5.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our understanding of dementia is shaped by cultural tropes. Such tropes may be helpful in making sense of an otherwise elusive and ultimately inscrutable state. In contemporary discourses on dementia, two tropes play a prominent role: the ‘return to childhood’ and the ‘living death’. This article subjects both cultural tropes to critical reflection. It first explains the cultural-historical origin and meaning of the ‘second childhood’ and ‘living death’ metaphors. It then explores their implications for our understanding of dementia and our attitudes and behaviors towards those affected. In doing so, it employs a life-course approach that draws attention to the normative significance of the temporal dimension and structural whole of a human life. In this way, it turns out that both metaphors essentially compare dementia with a different stage in human life and thus regard the condition as a deviation from biographical norms. The article then draws conclusions for ethical debates about self-determination, substitute decision-making and advance directives of people with dementia. Moreover, on a theoretical-conceptual level, it highlights the significance of a biographical and cultural-sensitive perspective for ethical theorizing.","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22613/ZFPP/5.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Our understanding of dementia is shaped by cultural tropes. Such tropes may be helpful in making sense of an otherwise elusive and ultimately inscrutable state. In contemporary discourses on dementia, two tropes play a prominent role: the ‘return to childhood’ and the ‘living death’. This article subjects both cultural tropes to critical reflection. It first explains the cultural-historical origin and meaning of the ‘second childhood’ and ‘living death’ metaphors. It then explores their implications for our understanding of dementia and our attitudes and behaviors towards those affected. In doing so, it employs a life-course approach that draws attention to the normative significance of the temporal dimension and structural whole of a human life. In this way, it turns out that both metaphors essentially compare dementia with a different stage in human life and thus regard the condition as a deviation from biographical norms. The article then draws conclusions for ethical debates about self-determination, substitute decision-making and advance directives of people with dementia. Moreover, on a theoretical-conceptual level, it highlights the significance of a biographical and cultural-sensitive perspective for ethical theorizing.
‚重返童年或‚活活死亡”?老年痴呆在生理机智上的道德问题
我们对痴呆症的理解受到文化比喻的影响。这样的比喻可能有助于理解一个难以捉摸、最终难以理解的状态。在当代关于痴呆症的论述中,两种比喻发挥着突出作用:“重返童年”和“活死人”。本文对这两种文化隐喻进行了批判性反思。它首先解释了“第二个童年”和“活死人”隐喻的文化历史渊源和意义。然后,它探讨了它们对我们对痴呆症的理解以及我们对患者的态度和行为的影响。在这样做时,它采用了一种生命历程的方法,使人们注意到人类生命的时间维度和结构整体的规范性意义。这样一来,事实证明,这两个隐喻本质上都是将痴呆症与人类生命的不同阶段进行比较,从而将这种情况视为对传记规范的偏离。然后,文章为关于痴呆症患者的自我决定、替代决策和预先指示的伦理辩论得出结论。此外,在理论概念层面上,它突出了传记和文化敏感视角对伦理理论化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信