From the Editor

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
J. Sipior
{"title":"From the Editor","authors":"J. Sipior","doi":"10.1080/10580530.2022.2011079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EDITOR,-In their paper on the basis of viscosimetric studies performed on human gastric mucus Markesich et al challenge the concept that Helicobacter pylon exerts unfavourable effects on the mucous layer coating the gastric mucosa (Gut 1995; 36: 327-9). Their results are clearly at variance with the bulk of the experiments carried out in this areal and Markesich and colleagues try to show the reasons for this discrepancy by pointing out the potential drawbacks of the previous studies. Even if we accept Markesich's concept, however, that the results of some experiments on H pylori have to be discarded because they are not performed on human mucus, other data are consistent with a mucus damaging effect of the micro-organism in humans. Assessing the quality of gastric soluble mucus in humans we found that, although on the whole mucus is normal both in chronic gastritis and in duodenal ulcer,2 the lowest values are detectable in subjects with H pylori infection.3 Sidebotham et al also observed a breakdown of gastric mucus in patients infected with Hpylori, although they ascribed this phenomenon to a carbonate-bicarbonate buffer at the mucosal surface due to the urease activity of the germ, rather than to a direct mucolytic activity.4 Measurements of the gastric mucus gel thickness in vivo showed that the mucous coating is significantly thinner in H pylori infected patients,5 possibly resulting from increased erosion. In keeping with the above results H pylori infection seems to reduce mucosal hydrophobicity of human gastric mucus, which retums to normal after successful eradication.6 The reason for the discrepancy of Markesich's results is probably the method used to examine mucus. Reference is made to a study7 to justify the use of viscosity analysis for assessing the characteristics of mucus, but it is well recognised that viscosimetry is an unreliable technique for evaluating mucus properties.8 The finding that gastric mucus viscosity is increased in duodenal ulcer patients7 is only a further demonstration of how misleading the method can be. As only luminal mucus was examined in Markesich's study, it must be also considered that proteolytic enzymes produced byH pylori could promote a greater peptic erosion of the adherent mucus gel with consequent increase in the mucoprotein content of gastric juice influencing viscosity measurements. Eradication ofH pylon would clearly reduce mucus shedding and thus apparently decrease the viscosity of intraluminal mucus. M GUSLANDI Gastroenterology Unit, S Raffaele Hospital, University ofMilan, Italy","PeriodicalId":56289,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Management","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2011079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EDITOR,-In their paper on the basis of viscosimetric studies performed on human gastric mucus Markesich et al challenge the concept that Helicobacter pylon exerts unfavourable effects on the mucous layer coating the gastric mucosa (Gut 1995; 36: 327-9). Their results are clearly at variance with the bulk of the experiments carried out in this areal and Markesich and colleagues try to show the reasons for this discrepancy by pointing out the potential drawbacks of the previous studies. Even if we accept Markesich's concept, however, that the results of some experiments on H pylori have to be discarded because they are not performed on human mucus, other data are consistent with a mucus damaging effect of the micro-organism in humans. Assessing the quality of gastric soluble mucus in humans we found that, although on the whole mucus is normal both in chronic gastritis and in duodenal ulcer,2 the lowest values are detectable in subjects with H pylori infection.3 Sidebotham et al also observed a breakdown of gastric mucus in patients infected with Hpylori, although they ascribed this phenomenon to a carbonate-bicarbonate buffer at the mucosal surface due to the urease activity of the germ, rather than to a direct mucolytic activity.4 Measurements of the gastric mucus gel thickness in vivo showed that the mucous coating is significantly thinner in H pylori infected patients,5 possibly resulting from increased erosion. In keeping with the above results H pylori infection seems to reduce mucosal hydrophobicity of human gastric mucus, which retums to normal after successful eradication.6 The reason for the discrepancy of Markesich's results is probably the method used to examine mucus. Reference is made to a study7 to justify the use of viscosity analysis for assessing the characteristics of mucus, but it is well recognised that viscosimetry is an unreliable technique for evaluating mucus properties.8 The finding that gastric mucus viscosity is increased in duodenal ulcer patients7 is only a further demonstration of how misleading the method can be. As only luminal mucus was examined in Markesich's study, it must be also considered that proteolytic enzymes produced byH pylori could promote a greater peptic erosion of the adherent mucus gel with consequent increase in the mucoprotein content of gastric juice influencing viscosity measurements. Eradication ofH pylon would clearly reduce mucus shedding and thus apparently decrease the viscosity of intraluminal mucus. M GUSLANDI Gastroenterology Unit, S Raffaele Hospital, University ofMilan, Italy
来自编辑
编辑,在他们的论文中,Markesich等人基于对人胃粘液进行的粘度学研究,挑战了幽门螺杆菌对胃粘膜粘膜层产生不利影响的概念(Gut 1995;36: 327 - 9)。他们的结果显然与该地区进行的大部分实验存在差异,Markesich及其同事试图通过指出先前研究的潜在缺陷来说明这种差异的原因。然而,即使我们接受Markesich的观点,即一些关于幽门螺杆菌的实验结果必须被丢弃,因为它们没有在人类粘液上进行,其他数据也与微生物对人类粘液的破坏作用相一致。评估人体胃可溶性粘液的质量,我们发现,尽管在慢性胃炎和十二指肠溃疡中,粘液总体上是正常的2,但在幽门螺杆菌感染的受试者中可检测到最低的值Sidebotham等人也观察到幽门螺杆菌感染患者的胃粘液分解,尽管他们将这种现象归因于细菌脲酶活性导致的粘膜表面碳酸盐-碳酸氢盐缓冲液,而不是直接的解黏液活性体内胃粘液凝胶厚度测量显示,幽门螺杆菌感染患者的粘膜涂层明显变薄,5可能是由于侵蚀增加。与上述结果一致,幽门螺杆菌感染似乎降低了人类胃粘液的粘膜疏水性,在成功根除后恢复正常Markesich的结果不一致的原因可能是用来检查粘液的方法。参考了一项研究,以证明使用粘度分析来评估黏液的特性是合理的,但众所周知,粘度测定法是一种不可靠的评估黏液特性的技术十二指肠溃疡患者胃粘液粘度增加的发现只是进一步证明了这种方法是多么容易误导。由于在Markesich的研究中只检查了腔内粘液,因此还必须考虑到幽门螺杆菌产生的蛋白水解酶可以促进黏液凝胶的更大消化性侵蚀,从而导致胃液中黏液蛋白含量的增加,影响粘度测量。清除h塔可明显减少黏液脱落,从而明显降低腔内黏液的黏度。意大利米兰大学S Raffaele医院M GUSLANDI消化科
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Management
Information Systems Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information Systems Management (ISM) is the on-going exchange of academic research, best practices, and insights based on managerial experience. The journal’s goal is to advance the practice of information systems management through this exchange. To meet this goal, ISM features themed papers examining a particular topic. In addition to themed papers, the journal regularly publishes on the following topics in IS management. Achieving Strategic IT Alignment and Capabilities IT Governance CIO and IT Leadership Roles IT Sourcing Planning and Managing an Enterprise Infrastructure IT Security Selecting and Delivering Application Solutions Portfolio Management Managing Complex IT Projects E-Business Technologies Supporting Knowledge Work The target readership includes both academics and practitioners. Hence, submissions integrating research and practice, and providing implications for both, are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信