F. Pozzi, F. Manganello, M. Passarelli, D. Persico, M. Romagnoli
{"title":"Collaborative Approaches in Online Nurse Education: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"F. Pozzi, F. Manganello, M. Passarelli, D. Persico, M. Romagnoli","doi":"10.34190/ejel.21.3.2751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the socio-constructivist theories of learning, collaborative learning allows negotiation of shared meanings and co-construction of new knowledge among peers. This approach fits particularly well with healthcare professional education needs, as these professionals often face challenging issues that require the ability to fully understand the complexity of the patients’ health conditions through working with others. However, while collaborative learning approaches are widely used in face-to-face nurse education contexts, their online equivalent still seem to be understudied, in spite of their great potential for the field. This systematic literature review investigates: (1) to what extent are online collaborative learning activities being adopted and investigated in formal nurse education, (2) What kind of online collaborative learning activities/techniques are proposed and what team structures are employed, (3) what technologies are used to run these learning activities, and (4) what methods are used to evaluate the impact of these activities. Studies were included if they presented online collaborative learning activities proposed by Universities or VET (Vocational Education and Training) providers. Articles published in 2015 or later were collected in November 2022 from Scopus, Web of Science and Medline. A total of 1059 records were retrieved, selected and analysed by four coders, resulting in a final dataset of 75 papers that were coded for type of collaborative approach, study characteristics, research methodology used, strength of evidence, and relevance to the research questions. Most of them described the use of activities like Discussions, Case Studies and Peer Reviews, sometimes in association with Role Play. In terms of technologies, Learning Managements Systems, forums and social media were already common pre-pandemic, but during the lockdown synchronous communication tools – often used to support simulations – took over. Data collection was carried out quantitatively, qualitatively or using mixed methods, but in many cases data reporting is weak or absent at all. The majority of the retrieved papers illustrate activities where collaboration was not structured in any way and there was no joint assignment or common objective/artefact that learners needed to reach/produce. In case of blended interventions, often collaboration is limited to the f2f sessions, while the digital setting is used for individual work. In terms of social structure, most of the time small groups or plenaries are used. In summary, the review reveals that studies on online collaborative learning for nurses are limited, especially in Europe, and the design of online collaborative activities often clashes with the principles put forward by the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) research community. Based on the results of the review we put forth some key recommendations, such as ensuring that online collaboration involves the creation of a shared artefact and striving to make virtual simulations actually collaborative, rather than limited to envisage student interactions in the debriefing phase. The paper also proposes a number of research areas seldom investigated and that would deserve further attention in the future.","PeriodicalId":46105,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of e-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.3.2751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to the socio-constructivist theories of learning, collaborative learning allows negotiation of shared meanings and co-construction of new knowledge among peers. This approach fits particularly well with healthcare professional education needs, as these professionals often face challenging issues that require the ability to fully understand the complexity of the patients’ health conditions through working with others. However, while collaborative learning approaches are widely used in face-to-face nurse education contexts, their online equivalent still seem to be understudied, in spite of their great potential for the field. This systematic literature review investigates: (1) to what extent are online collaborative learning activities being adopted and investigated in formal nurse education, (2) What kind of online collaborative learning activities/techniques are proposed and what team structures are employed, (3) what technologies are used to run these learning activities, and (4) what methods are used to evaluate the impact of these activities. Studies were included if they presented online collaborative learning activities proposed by Universities or VET (Vocational Education and Training) providers. Articles published in 2015 or later were collected in November 2022 from Scopus, Web of Science and Medline. A total of 1059 records were retrieved, selected and analysed by four coders, resulting in a final dataset of 75 papers that were coded for type of collaborative approach, study characteristics, research methodology used, strength of evidence, and relevance to the research questions. Most of them described the use of activities like Discussions, Case Studies and Peer Reviews, sometimes in association with Role Play. In terms of technologies, Learning Managements Systems, forums and social media were already common pre-pandemic, but during the lockdown synchronous communication tools – often used to support simulations – took over. Data collection was carried out quantitatively, qualitatively or using mixed methods, but in many cases data reporting is weak or absent at all. The majority of the retrieved papers illustrate activities where collaboration was not structured in any way and there was no joint assignment or common objective/artefact that learners needed to reach/produce. In case of blended interventions, often collaboration is limited to the f2f sessions, while the digital setting is used for individual work. In terms of social structure, most of the time small groups or plenaries are used. In summary, the review reveals that studies on online collaborative learning for nurses are limited, especially in Europe, and the design of online collaborative activities often clashes with the principles put forward by the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) research community. Based on the results of the review we put forth some key recommendations, such as ensuring that online collaboration involves the creation of a shared artefact and striving to make virtual simulations actually collaborative, rather than limited to envisage student interactions in the debriefing phase. The paper also proposes a number of research areas seldom investigated and that would deserve further attention in the future.
根据社会建构主义学习理论,协作学习允许同伴之间协商共享的意义和共同构建新知识。这种方法特别适合医疗专业人员的教育需求,因为这些专业人员经常面临挑战性问题,需要通过与他人合作来充分了解患者健康状况的复杂性。然而,尽管协作学习方法在面对面护士教育环境中被广泛使用,但尽管其在该领域具有巨大潜力,但其在线等效方法似乎仍被研究不足。这篇系统的文献综述调查了:(1)在正规护士教育中,在线协作学习活动在多大程度上被采用和调查,以及(4)使用什么方法来评估这些活动的影响。如果研究提供了大学或职业教育与培训(VET)提供者提出的在线合作学习活动,则将其纳入研究。2015年或之后发表的文章于2022年11月从Scopus、Web of Science和Medline收集。四位编码人员检索、选择和分析了总共1059份记录,形成了一个由75篇论文组成的最终数据集,这些论文根据合作方法的类型、研究特征、使用的研究方法、证据的强度和与研究问题的相关性进行了编码。他们中的大多数人描述了讨论、案例研究和同行评审等活动的使用,有时与角色扮演有关。在技术方面,学习管理系统、论坛和社交媒体在疫情前就已经很常见了,但在封锁期间,同步通信工具——通常用于支持模拟——取而代之。数据收集是定量、定性或使用混合方法进行的,但在许多情况下,数据报告薄弱或根本没有。检索到的大多数论文都说明了合作没有任何结构,也没有学习者需要达成/产生的共同任务或共同目标/工件的活动。在混合干预的情况下,合作通常仅限于f2f会议,而数字环境用于个人工作。就社会结构而言,大多数时候都是使用小团体或合议庭。总之,综述表明,对护士在线协作学习的研究是有限的,尤其是在欧洲,在线协作活动的设计往往与计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)研究界提出的原则相冲突。根据审查结果,我们提出了一些关键建议,例如确保在线协作涉及创建共享的人工制品,并努力使虚拟模拟真正具有协作性,而不仅仅局限于设想学生在汇报阶段的互动。该论文还提出了一些很少调查的研究领域,这些领域在未来值得进一步关注。