Information Ethics from a Multicultural Perspective: Content Analysis of Selected Library and Information Science Publications

Q2 Social Sciences
Michele A. L. Villagran, Nayana Pampapura Madali, Amanda S. Green, Suliman Hawamdeh
{"title":"Information Ethics from a Multicultural Perspective: Content Analysis of Selected Library and Information Science Publications","authors":"Michele A. L. Villagran, Nayana Pampapura Madali, Amanda S. Green, Suliman Hawamdeh","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2021-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information ethics governs the way in which information is created, manipulated, and used. The integration of ethical values in education and coursework has been of interest in many fields, including the discipline of library and information science (LIS). Integrating information ethics in library and information science education and research is essential for preparing the next generation of information professionals for an increasingly diverse and multicultural society. This study examines information ethics from multicultural perspectives by exploring the extent to which LIS faculty view and articulate information ethics in their research and scholarly publications. The study sample was assembled by identifying the top LIS schools in the United States, selecting one LIS faculty member for each school, and examining the research output for each scholar for the use of multicultural and information ethics terminology. The text analysis was conducted using Python. Faculty were selected for the study based on their engagement in multicultural research rather than their minority status. The study results indicate that information ethics is not a primary research focus of LIS scholarship. There is no uniform reference for information ethics, and the most commonly associated terms received low percentage results. The impact of information ethics should be considered in every area of LIS scholarship and practice.","PeriodicalId":37587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2021-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information ethics governs the way in which information is created, manipulated, and used. The integration of ethical values in education and coursework has been of interest in many fields, including the discipline of library and information science (LIS). Integrating information ethics in library and information science education and research is essential for preparing the next generation of information professionals for an increasingly diverse and multicultural society. This study examines information ethics from multicultural perspectives by exploring the extent to which LIS faculty view and articulate information ethics in their research and scholarly publications. The study sample was assembled by identifying the top LIS schools in the United States, selecting one LIS faculty member for each school, and examining the research output for each scholar for the use of multicultural and information ethics terminology. The text analysis was conducted using Python. Faculty were selected for the study based on their engagement in multicultural research rather than their minority status. The study results indicate that information ethics is not a primary research focus of LIS scholarship. There is no uniform reference for information ethics, and the most commonly associated terms received low percentage results. The impact of information ethics should be considered in every area of LIS scholarship and practice.
多元文化视野下的信息伦理——图书情报学选刊内容分析
信息伦理规范信息的创造、操纵和使用方式。伦理价值观在教育和课程中的整合已经引起了许多领域的兴趣,包括图书馆与信息科学(LIS)学科。在图书馆情报学教育和研究中整合信息伦理是为日益多样化和多元文化的社会培养下一代信息专业人员所必需的。本研究从多元文化的角度考察信息伦理,探讨美国大学教师在其研究和学术出版物中对信息伦理的看法和表达程度。研究样本是通过确定美国顶尖的LIS学院,为每所学院选择一名LIS教员,并检查每位学者使用多元文化和信息伦理术语的研究成果来收集的。文本分析使用Python进行。参与这项研究的教师是基于他们对多元文化研究的参与,而不是他们的少数民族身份。研究结果表明,信息伦理并不是信息科学研究的主要重点。信息伦理没有统一的参考,最常见的相关术语得到的结果百分比很低。信息伦理的影响应该在美国学术和实践的各个领域得到考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS) is a fully refereed scholarly periodical that has been published quarterly by the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) since 1960. JELIS supports scholarly inquiry in library and information science (LIS) education by serving as the primary venue for the publication of research articles, reviews, and brief communications about issues of interest to LIS educators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信