Comparing Traditional Teaching Method and Experiential Teaching Method using Experimental Research

Farhan Uddin Raja, Najmonnisa Khan
{"title":"Comparing Traditional Teaching Method and Experiential Teaching Method using Experimental Research","authors":"Farhan Uddin Raja, Najmonnisa Khan","doi":"10.22555/JOEED.V5I2.1816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern time is shaping a world of opportunities that has glorified the roleand functions of multinational organizations across the globe. An individual hasbecome a global citizen, who explores employment opportunities in differentcountries of the world. This has signified the importance of interpersonal skills that allow individuals to connect with people from different cultures. As a result, the role of business communication instructors has become vital because they impart the skills of communication among their students. For this, instructors’ sensitivity towards the teaching methods used in classrooms are of prime significance. These methods determine the interest level and motivation of students towards learning and acquisition of communication skills. Therefore, this study aims to compare experiential learning method and traditional learning method to explore which method inculcates and improves the communication skills of business administration students of a private sector university. The study was conducted in a quantitative paradigm using an experimental research design. The sample size comprised 60 BBA students from two different sections of business communication courses. The data were collected using a pretest and posttest. For the pretest, communication skills were imparted to both the groups using the traditional teaching method that heavily employed lecturing. For the posttest, the controlled group was taught using the same traditional teaching method while the treatment group was taught using the experiential learning method. Mean scores 20.46 & 19.90 with a significant value of 0.375 for the pretest established identical nature of both groups. Mean scores 27.80 & 30.36 with a significant value of .002 of posttest showed that the two groups under study had different identities in scores, which proved that experiential learning method improves students’ communication skills better than traditional communication skills.Keywords: business communication, experiential learning, experimental research, traditional learning","PeriodicalId":31508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Educational Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22555/JOEED.V5I2.1816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

The modern time is shaping a world of opportunities that has glorified the roleand functions of multinational organizations across the globe. An individual hasbecome a global citizen, who explores employment opportunities in differentcountries of the world. This has signified the importance of interpersonal skills that allow individuals to connect with people from different cultures. As a result, the role of business communication instructors has become vital because they impart the skills of communication among their students. For this, instructors’ sensitivity towards the teaching methods used in classrooms are of prime significance. These methods determine the interest level and motivation of students towards learning and acquisition of communication skills. Therefore, this study aims to compare experiential learning method and traditional learning method to explore which method inculcates and improves the communication skills of business administration students of a private sector university. The study was conducted in a quantitative paradigm using an experimental research design. The sample size comprised 60 BBA students from two different sections of business communication courses. The data were collected using a pretest and posttest. For the pretest, communication skills were imparted to both the groups using the traditional teaching method that heavily employed lecturing. For the posttest, the controlled group was taught using the same traditional teaching method while the treatment group was taught using the experiential learning method. Mean scores 20.46 & 19.90 with a significant value of 0.375 for the pretest established identical nature of both groups. Mean scores 27.80 & 30.36 with a significant value of .002 of posttest showed that the two groups under study had different identities in scores, which proved that experiential learning method improves students’ communication skills better than traditional communication skills.Keywords: business communication, experiential learning, experimental research, traditional learning
传统教学方法与体验式教学方法的实验研究比较
现代社会正在塑造一个充满机遇的世界,在全球范围内,跨国组织的作用和职能得到了重视。一个人已经成为世界公民,他在世界不同的国家探索就业机会。这表明了人际交往能力的重要性,它使个人能够与来自不同文化背景的人建立联系。因此,商务沟通教师的角色变得至关重要,因为他们向学生传授沟通技巧。为此,教师对课堂教学方法的敏感度至关重要。这些方法决定了学生学习和获得沟通技巧的兴趣水平和动机。因此,本研究旨在比较体验式学习方法和传统学习方法,探讨哪种方法能够培养和提高私立大学工商管理专业学生的沟通能力。本研究采用实验研究设计,采用定量范式进行。样本包括60名工商管理硕士学生,他们来自商业沟通课程的两个不同部分。数据收集采用前测和后测。在测试前,两组学生都采用传统的授课方式学习沟通技巧。后测时,对照组采用传统教学方法进行教学,治疗组采用体验式学习方法进行教学。平均得分为20.46和19.90,显著值为0.375,前测确定了两组的相同性质。后测平均分27.80分和30.36分,显著值为0.002,表明两组被试在分数上具有不同的认同,这证明体验式学习方法比传统的沟通方式更能提高学生的沟通能力。关键词:商务沟通,体验式学习,实验研究,传统学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书