Similar survival of birds between wet and seasonally dry Neotropical environments

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Ibis Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1111/ibi.13254
Clarisse Caroline de Oliveira E. Silva, Luciana Vieira de Paiva, Mauro Pichorim, Lemuel Oliveira Leite, João Batista Pinho, Raphael Igor Dias, Daniel Cunha Passos, Leonardo Fernandes França
{"title":"Similar survival of birds between wet and seasonally dry Neotropical environments","authors":"Clarisse Caroline de Oliveira E. Silva,&nbsp;Luciana Vieira de Paiva,&nbsp;Mauro Pichorim,&nbsp;Lemuel Oliveira Leite,&nbsp;João Batista Pinho,&nbsp;Raphael Igor Dias,&nbsp;Daniel Cunha Passos,&nbsp;Leonardo Fernandes França","doi":"10.1111/ibi.13254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies in the tropics suggest a regional similarity in survival rates of adult birds; however, this literature often overlooks species in semi-arid tropical environments. Bird survival in seasonally dry environments (e.g. seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFa)) may be lower than that in more constantly wet areas (e.g. tropical rainforests (TRFs)), especially if the birds are negatively affected by seasonal rainfall or food-limitation. However, survival could be similar across these tropical environments, as the asymmetry between young and adult mortality tends to be high in all tropical areas, and the higher risk of mortality in young animals may favour adult survival (residual reproductive investment) regardless of the local climatic conditions. To fill this knowledge gap, we tested the hypothesis that bird survival is similar between seasonally dry (SDTF) and constantly wet (TRF) Neotropical environments. We estimated the apparent survival of 27 South American bird populations from three SDTF areas and 39 populations from a TRF. Apparent survival was estimated from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) models fitted using a Bayesian structure and the resulting variation in survival rates between study areas and with body mass was explored using a Bayesian phylogenetic mixed model. Apparent annual survival of passerines did not differ between areas (geometrical mean of survival: SDTF = 0.50, 0.56, 0.64; TRF = 0.58), but body mass was positively associated with survival. The variation in bird survival was partially explained by phylogenetic relationships among species. Our results suggest that bird survival is regionally similar in Neotropical forests, despite the climatic variation. We discuss possible physiological and behavioural mechanisms adopted by birds in SDTFs to attenuate effects of environmental seasonality on survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13254,"journal":{"name":"Ibis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies in the tropics suggest a regional similarity in survival rates of adult birds; however, this literature often overlooks species in semi-arid tropical environments. Bird survival in seasonally dry environments (e.g. seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFa)) may be lower than that in more constantly wet areas (e.g. tropical rainforests (TRFs)), especially if the birds are negatively affected by seasonal rainfall or food-limitation. However, survival could be similar across these tropical environments, as the asymmetry between young and adult mortality tends to be high in all tropical areas, and the higher risk of mortality in young animals may favour adult survival (residual reproductive investment) regardless of the local climatic conditions. To fill this knowledge gap, we tested the hypothesis that bird survival is similar between seasonally dry (SDTF) and constantly wet (TRF) Neotropical environments. We estimated the apparent survival of 27 South American bird populations from three SDTF areas and 39 populations from a TRF. Apparent survival was estimated from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) models fitted using a Bayesian structure and the resulting variation in survival rates between study areas and with body mass was explored using a Bayesian phylogenetic mixed model. Apparent annual survival of passerines did not differ between areas (geometrical mean of survival: SDTF = 0.50, 0.56, 0.64; TRF = 0.58), but body mass was positively associated with survival. The variation in bird survival was partially explained by phylogenetic relationships among species. Our results suggest that bird survival is regionally similar in Neotropical forests, despite the climatic variation. We discuss possible physiological and behavioural mechanisms adopted by birds in SDTFs to attenuate effects of environmental seasonality on survival.

鸟类在潮湿和季节性干燥的新热带环境中的存活率相似
热带地区的研究表明,成鸟的存活率具有区域相似性;然而,这些文献往往忽略了半干旱热带环境中的物种。季节性干旱环境(如季节性干旱热带森林(SDTFa))中鸟类的存活率可能低于常年湿润地区(如热带雨林(TRFs)),尤其是当鸟类受到季节性降雨或食物限制的负面影响时。然而,这些热带环境中的鸟类存活率可能是相似的,因为在所有热带地区,幼鸟和成鸟的死亡率往往不对称,无论当地气候条件如何,幼鸟的死亡风险较高,这可能有利于成鸟的存活(剩余生殖投资)。为了填补这一知识空白,我们对季节性干旱(SDTF)和持续潮湿(TRF)的新热带环境中鸟类存活率相似这一假设进行了检验。我们估算了三个 SDTF 地区的 27 个南美鸟类种群和一个 TRF 地区的 39 个种群的表观存活率。表观存活率是通过使用贝叶斯结构拟合的 Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) 模型估算的,并使用贝叶斯系统发育混合模型探讨了不同研究地区之间存活率的差异以及体质量的差异。不同地区之间雀形目鸟类的表观年存活率没有差异(存活率几何平均数:SDTF = 0.50, 0.56, 0.64; TRF = 0.58),但鸟体质量与存活率呈正相关。物种间的系统发育关系可部分解释鸟类存活率的变化。我们的研究结果表明,尽管气候存在差异,但新热带森林中鸟类的存活率在区域上是相似的。我们讨论了鸟类在 SDTFs 中可能采用的生理和行为机制,以减轻环境季节性对生存的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ibis
Ibis 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IBIS publishes original papers, reviews, short communications and forum articles reflecting the forefront of international research activity in ornithological science, with special emphasis on the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds. IBIS aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信