Evaluation of the relation between cerebroplacental ratio, umbilical-cerebral ratio, and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

IF 1.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
S. Khanjani, F. Farahbod, E. Zarean, M. Tarrahi, B. Mohammadi
{"title":"Evaluation of the relation between cerebroplacental ratio, umbilical-cerebral ratio, and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction","authors":"S. Khanjani, F. Farahbod, E. Zarean, M. Tarrahi, B. Mohammadi","doi":"10.34172/ipp.2023.39503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Doppler parameters, including the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), with adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 100 women with a singleton pregnancy 28 and 36.8 weeks of gestation was complicated by FGR and mild abnormalities. Feto-maternal Doppler examinations were conducted by the CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters. Adverse outcomes were defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, preterm birth <37-week, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, fetal distress, and emergency cesarean section. These outcome parameters were checked with the results of the last ultrasound which performed 1-2 weeks before delivery. Results: Mean umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) (1.18±0.31 versus 1.04±0.21, P=0.010) and mean uterine arteries (UtAs)-PI (1.18±0.45 versus 0.96±0.36, P=0.20) were significantly higher in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those that did not experience them. Mean CPUR (1.82±1.03 versus 2.25±0.83, P=0.039) was significantly lower in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes versus those that did not. In binary multivariate logistic regression analysis, CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters were evaluated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Only CPUR had a significant relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes. CPUR had a substantial relationship with Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02-0.63; P=0.012). Conclusion: CPUR is a new Doppler ratio associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies with minimal abnormalities.","PeriodicalId":13454,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathologia Persa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathologia Persa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2023.39503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Doppler parameters, including the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), with adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 100 women with a singleton pregnancy 28 and 36.8 weeks of gestation was complicated by FGR and mild abnormalities. Feto-maternal Doppler examinations were conducted by the CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters. Adverse outcomes were defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, preterm birth <37-week, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, fetal distress, and emergency cesarean section. These outcome parameters were checked with the results of the last ultrasound which performed 1-2 weeks before delivery. Results: Mean umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) (1.18±0.31 versus 1.04±0.21, P=0.010) and mean uterine arteries (UtAs)-PI (1.18±0.45 versus 0.96±0.36, P=0.20) were significantly higher in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those that did not experience them. Mean CPUR (1.82±1.03 versus 2.25±0.83, P=0.039) was significantly lower in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes versus those that did not. In binary multivariate logistic regression analysis, CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters were evaluated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Only CPUR had a significant relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes. CPUR had a substantial relationship with Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02-0.63; P=0.012). Conclusion: CPUR is a new Doppler ratio associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies with minimal abnormalities.
评价脑胎盘比、脐脑比、脑胎盘子宫比与妊娠合并胎儿生长受限围产儿不良结局发生的关系
胎儿生长受限(FGR)是与不良围产期结局风险增加相关的主要产科并发症。目的:本研究旨在评价单胎妊娠合并FGR患者的多普勒参数,包括脑胎盘比(CPR)、脐脑比(UCR)和脑胎盘子宫比(CPUR)与不良围产期结局的关系。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,100例单胎妊娠28周和36.8周合并FGR和轻度异常的妇女。通过心肺复苏术(CPR)、超声复苏术(UCR)和心肺复苏术(CPR)参数进行胎母多普勒检查。不良结局定义为5分钟时Apgar评分<7、早产<37周、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院、胎儿窘迫和紧急剖宫产。这些结果参数与分娩前1-2周进行的最后一次超声结果进行核对。结果:围产期不良结局孕妇的平均脐动脉脉搏指数(UA-PI)(1.18±0.31比1.04±0.21,P=0.010)和平均子宫动脉指数(UtAs)-PI(1.18±0.45比0.96±0.36,P=0.20)显著高于未发生围产期不良结局孕妇。平均CPUR(1.82±1.03 vs 2.25±0.83,P=0.039)在经历不良围产期结局的妊娠中显著低于未经历不良围产期结局的妊娠。在二元多变量logistic回归分析中,CPR、UCR和CPUR参数与不良围产期结局进行评估。只有CPUR与围产期不良结局有显著关系。CPUR与5分钟Apgar评分<7有显著关系(OR: 0.13;95% ci: 0.02-0.63;P = 0.012)。结论:CPUR是一种新的多普勒比值,与FGR妊娠的不良围产期结局有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信