Productivity and quality when editing machine translation and translation memory outputs: an empirical analysis of English to Welsh translation

Benjamin Screen
{"title":"Productivity and quality when editing machine translation and translation memory outputs: an empirical analysis of English to Welsh translation","authors":"Benjamin Screen","doi":"10.1515/scp-2017-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on a controlled study carried out to examine the possible benefits of editing Machine Translation and Translation Memory outputs when translating from English to Welsh. Using software capable of timing the translation process per segment, 8 professional translators each translated 75 sentences of differing match percentage, and post- edited a further 25 segments of Machine Translation. Basing the final analysis on 800 sentences and 17,440 words, the use of Fuzzy Matches in the 70-99% match range, Exact Matches and Statistical Machine Translation was found to significantly speed up the translation process. Significant correlations were also found between the processing time data of Exact Matches and Machine Translation post-editing, rather than between Fuzzy Matches and Machine Translation as expected. Two experienced translators were then asked to rate all translations for fidelity, grammaticality and style, whereby it was found that the use of translation technology either did not negatively affect translation quality compared to manual translation, or its use actually improved final quality in some cases. As well as confirming the findings of research in relation to translation technology, these findings also contradict supposed similarities between translation quality in terms of style and post-editing Machine Translation.","PeriodicalId":32192,"journal":{"name":"Studia Celtica Posnaniensia","volume":"2 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/scp-2017-0007","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Celtica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scp-2017-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract This article reports on a controlled study carried out to examine the possible benefits of editing Machine Translation and Translation Memory outputs when translating from English to Welsh. Using software capable of timing the translation process per segment, 8 professional translators each translated 75 sentences of differing match percentage, and post- edited a further 25 segments of Machine Translation. Basing the final analysis on 800 sentences and 17,440 words, the use of Fuzzy Matches in the 70-99% match range, Exact Matches and Statistical Machine Translation was found to significantly speed up the translation process. Significant correlations were also found between the processing time data of Exact Matches and Machine Translation post-editing, rather than between Fuzzy Matches and Machine Translation as expected. Two experienced translators were then asked to rate all translations for fidelity, grammaticality and style, whereby it was found that the use of translation technology either did not negatively affect translation quality compared to manual translation, or its use actually improved final quality in some cases. As well as confirming the findings of research in relation to translation technology, these findings also contradict supposed similarities between translation quality in terms of style and post-editing Machine Translation.
编辑机器翻译和翻译记忆输出时的生产力和质量:英语到威尔士语翻译的实证分析
摘要本文报道了一项对照研究,旨在检验在从英语翻译为威尔士语时编辑机器翻译和翻译记忆输出的可能好处。8名专业翻译人员使用能够对每个片段的翻译过程进行计时的软件,每人翻译了75个匹配百分比不同的句子,并对机器翻译的另外25个片段进行了后期编辑。通过对800个句子和17440个单词的分析,发现在70-99%匹配范围内使用模糊匹配、精确匹配和统计机器翻译可以显著加快翻译过程。在编辑后的精确匹配和机器翻译的处理时间数据之间也发现了显著的相关性,而不是如预期的那样在模糊匹配和机器转换之间。然后,两名经验丰富的翻译人员被要求对所有翻译的保真度、语法性和风格进行评分,结果发现,与手工翻译相比,翻译技术的使用要么不会对翻译质量产生负面影响,要么在某些情况下,它的使用实际上提高了最终质量。这些发现不仅证实了与翻译技术相关的研究结果,还与所谓的风格翻译质量与编辑后机器翻译之间的相似性相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书