Running Performance and Position is Not Related to Decision-Making Accuracy in Referees

A. Riiser, V. Andersen, A. Sæterbakken, Einar Ylvisåker, V. F. Moe
{"title":"Running Performance and Position is Not Related to Decision-Making Accuracy in Referees","authors":"A. Riiser, V. Andersen, A. Sæterbakken, Einar Ylvisåker, V. F. Moe","doi":"10.1055/a-0958-8608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We aimed to assess if running performance is related to decision-making accuracy in referees. We also investigated the relationships between movement, position, decision-making and time of infringement. The study included 347 free kicks and penalties awarded during all 15 home field matches for one team in the Norwegian top league. Movement and position were measured by a radio-based positioning system, and two external experts analysed the video clips. The referees made the correct decision in 98% of the assessed foul situations. There were no associations between the correctness and running speed at the time of the infringements or total distance accumulated during the 30 s prior to the infringement (p>0.08). Decision-making accuracy was not associated with the referees’ position in relation to the infringements (p=0.82) or the area where the infringements occurred (p=0.28). Most foul play incidents were sanctioned in the central area of the field (84%) where the distance to the infringements was shorter (13.4 m, 95% CI 12.8–14.0) than in the lateral areas (21.9 m, 95% CI 20.4–23.4). Norwegian top referees were practically always right when they interfered, possess the necessary fitness to avoid fatigue that would influence decision-making accuracy, and maintain adequate positional ability throughout the matches.","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"3 1","pages":"E66 - E71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0958-8608","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0958-8608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract We aimed to assess if running performance is related to decision-making accuracy in referees. We also investigated the relationships between movement, position, decision-making and time of infringement. The study included 347 free kicks and penalties awarded during all 15 home field matches for one team in the Norwegian top league. Movement and position were measured by a radio-based positioning system, and two external experts analysed the video clips. The referees made the correct decision in 98% of the assessed foul situations. There were no associations between the correctness and running speed at the time of the infringements or total distance accumulated during the 30 s prior to the infringement (p>0.08). Decision-making accuracy was not associated with the referees’ position in relation to the infringements (p=0.82) or the area where the infringements occurred (p=0.28). Most foul play incidents were sanctioned in the central area of the field (84%) where the distance to the infringements was shorter (13.4 m, 95% CI 12.8–14.0) than in the lateral areas (21.9 m, 95% CI 20.4–23.4). Norwegian top referees were practically always right when they interfered, possess the necessary fitness to avoid fatigue that would influence decision-making accuracy, and maintain adequate positional ability throughout the matches.
裁判员的跑位和跑位与决策准确性无关
摘要我们旨在评估裁判的跑动表现是否与决策准确性有关。我们还调查了运动、立场、决策和侵权时间之间的关系。这项研究包括挪威顶级联赛中一支球队在全部15场主场比赛中获得的347个任意球和点球。通过无线电定位系统测量了运动和位置,两名外部专家分析了视频剪辑。裁判在98%的犯规情况下做出了正确的判罚。在违规时的正确性与跑步速度或30分钟内累积的总距离之间没有关联 s(p>0.05)。裁判的判罚准确性与裁判在犯规方面的位置无关(p=0.82)或与犯规发生的区域无关(p=0.28)。大多数犯规事件都发生在距离犯规较短的场地中心区域(84%)(13.4 m、 95%置信区间12.8–14.0)高于横向区域(21.9 m、 95%置信区间20.4–23.4)。挪威顶级裁判在干扰时几乎总是正确的,拥有必要的体能来避免影响决策准确性的疲劳,并在整场比赛中保持足够的位置能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信