Self-assessment on the achievement of the ability of mathematical proportional application in Meaningful Instructional Design (MID) learning viewed from student’s learning style
M. Mulyono, Kartono Kartono, Meis Dania Nila Rosyida
{"title":"Self-assessment on the achievement of the ability of mathematical proportional application in Meaningful Instructional Design (MID) learning viewed from student’s learning style","authors":"M. Mulyono, Kartono Kartono, Meis Dania Nila Rosyida","doi":"10.15294/ujme.v7i1.20751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) test the students' mathematical proportional reasoning ability to achieve classical mastery, (2) to analyze the average achievement of mathematical proportional reasoning ability in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment with the common learning model (3) to test the proportion of students’ mastery in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment which is better than the proportion of the common learning model and (4) to obtain a description of students' proportional reasoning abilities of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic style of learning style. The method used in this research is Mixed Methods Concurrent Embedded Design. The quantitative subject of this study is the students of class VIII B MTs NU Banat Kudus as the experimental class which use Meaningful Instructional Design, while the subject of qualitative research is 6 students of class VIII B consisting of 2 students with the high and low value on mathematical proportional reasoning test in each learning style group. Eventually, the results of this study are (1) the achievement of students’ mathematical proportional reasoning ability is significant in MID learning, (2) there is difference of proportional reasoning ability in MID learning model with a common used learning model, (3) the proportion of students' learning mastery by using Meaningful Instructional Design model with Self-assessment is higher than those who use the common learning model and (4) the students with visual learning style are able to propose and perform mathematical manipulation by understanding and remembering the material ever seen and written, the students with auditory learning style are able to make guesses, present mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material discussed, while students with kinesthetic learning style are able to make guesses, perform mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material which is ever practiced.","PeriodicalId":30733,"journal":{"name":"Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v7i1.20751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study aims to (1) test the students' mathematical proportional reasoning ability to achieve classical mastery, (2) to analyze the average achievement of mathematical proportional reasoning ability in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment with the common learning model (3) to test the proportion of students’ mastery in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment which is better than the proportion of the common learning model and (4) to obtain a description of students' proportional reasoning abilities of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic style of learning style. The method used in this research is Mixed Methods Concurrent Embedded Design. The quantitative subject of this study is the students of class VIII B MTs NU Banat Kudus as the experimental class which use Meaningful Instructional Design, while the subject of qualitative research is 6 students of class VIII B consisting of 2 students with the high and low value on mathematical proportional reasoning test in each learning style group. Eventually, the results of this study are (1) the achievement of students’ mathematical proportional reasoning ability is significant in MID learning, (2) there is difference of proportional reasoning ability in MID learning model with a common used learning model, (3) the proportion of students' learning mastery by using Meaningful Instructional Design model with Self-assessment is higher than those who use the common learning model and (4) the students with visual learning style are able to propose and perform mathematical manipulation by understanding and remembering the material ever seen and written, the students with auditory learning style are able to make guesses, present mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material discussed, while students with kinesthetic learning style are able to make guesses, perform mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material which is ever practiced.
本研究旨在(1)测试学生的数学比例推理能力,(2)运用普通学习模型进行自我评估,分析数学比例推理能力在有意义教学设计学习中的平均成绩描述学生的视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的比例推理能力。本研究采用的方法是混合方法并行嵌入式设计。本研究的定量研究对象是采用有意义教学设计的实验班八B MTs NU Banat Kudus的学生,而定性研究对象是八B班的6名学生,由每个学习风格组中数学比例推理测试值高和低的2名学生组成。最终,本研究的结果是:(1)学生的数学比例推理能力在MID学习中的成绩显著;(2)MID学习模式与常用的学习模式在比例推理能力上存在差异,(3)使用具有自我评估的有意义教学设计模型的学生的学习掌握率高于使用普通学习模型的学生;(4)具有视觉学习风格的学生能够通过理解和记忆所见过和写过的材料来提出和执行数学操作,听觉学习风格的学生能够通过理解和记忆所讨论的材料进行猜测、进行数学运算并得出结论,而动觉学习风格的同学能够通过理解并记忆所练习的材料进行推测、进行数学操作并得出结论。