Analyzing The Efficacy Of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment Of Chronic Mixed Blepharitis Via Laser Doppler Flowmetry And Interferometry

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
T. Safonova, N. P. Kintyukhina
{"title":"Analyzing The Efficacy Of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment Of Chronic Mixed Blepharitis Via Laser Doppler Flowmetry And Interferometry","authors":"T. Safonova, N. P. Kintyukhina","doi":"10.15275/rusomj.2022.0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — To analyze and compare the efficacy of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic mixed blepharitis via laser Doppler flowmetry and interferometry. Materials and methods — We enrolled 42 patients (the sample of 84 eyes) with chronic mixed blepharitis in the study. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) was used to assess the microcirculation in the eyelid skin; interferometry was employed to evaluate the lipid layer of the tear film. Patients in the treatment group were treated by meibomian gland probing (MGP) and by artificial tears with a lipid component, introduced 4 times a day for 30 days. Subjects in the control group had their eyelid massaged in addition to administration of artificial tears. Treatment efficacy was monitored at 1 week, 1.5 months and 3 months. Results — MGP demonstrated a statistically significant positive effect, which persisted for 3 months after the procedure: specifically, the restoration of the tear film stability by increasing the thickness of its lipid layer by 0.27-0.5 μm. When comparing the interferoscopy results, an increase in the area of the lipid layer absence was detected in the control group. Analysis of LDF results showed a decrease in neurogenic and myogenic rhythms, as well as in the blood flow coefficient of variation in both groups. The lymph flow coefficient of variation remained stable in the treatment group, while it tended to decrease in the control group. Conclusion — The obtained data analysis on the basis of objective instrumental assessment of the eyelid morphofunctional state by the methods of interferoscopy and LDF suggested that conducting MGP was more effective in chronic mixed blepharitis treatment, compared with performing an eyelid massage.","PeriodicalId":21426,"journal":{"name":"Russian Open Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Open Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2022.0212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective — To analyze and compare the efficacy of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic mixed blepharitis via laser Doppler flowmetry and interferometry. Materials and methods — We enrolled 42 patients (the sample of 84 eyes) with chronic mixed blepharitis in the study. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) was used to assess the microcirculation in the eyelid skin; interferometry was employed to evaluate the lipid layer of the tear film. Patients in the treatment group were treated by meibomian gland probing (MGP) and by artificial tears with a lipid component, introduced 4 times a day for 30 days. Subjects in the control group had their eyelid massaged in addition to administration of artificial tears. Treatment efficacy was monitored at 1 week, 1.5 months and 3 months. Results — MGP demonstrated a statistically significant positive effect, which persisted for 3 months after the procedure: specifically, the restoration of the tear film stability by increasing the thickness of its lipid layer by 0.27-0.5 μm. When comparing the interferoscopy results, an increase in the area of the lipid layer absence was detected in the control group. Analysis of LDF results showed a decrease in neurogenic and myogenic rhythms, as well as in the blood flow coefficient of variation in both groups. The lymph flow coefficient of variation remained stable in the treatment group, while it tended to decrease in the control group. Conclusion — The obtained data analysis on the basis of objective instrumental assessment of the eyelid morphofunctional state by the methods of interferoscopy and LDF suggested that conducting MGP was more effective in chronic mixed blepharitis treatment, compared with performing an eyelid massage.
激光多普勒血流和干涉术分析保守治疗与手术治疗慢性混合性睑缘炎的疗效
目的:通过激光多普勒血流测量和干涉测量术,分析和比较保守治疗和手术治疗慢性混合性睑缘炎的疗效。材料和方法——我们纳入了42例(84眼的样本)慢性混合性睑缘炎的研究。采用激光多普勒血流测定法(LDF)评价眼睑皮肤微循环;采用干涉测量法对泪膜的脂质层进行了评价。治疗组患者通过睑板腺探诊(MGP)和含有脂质成分的人工泪液进行治疗,每天4次,持续30天。对照组的受试者除了使用人工泪液外,还进行了眼睑按摩。在1周、1.5个月和3个月时监测治疗效果。结果——MGP显示出统计学上显著的积极作用,该作用在手术后持续了3个月:特别是,通过增加脂质层厚度0.27-0.5μm来恢复泪膜的稳定性。当比较干涉检查结果时,在对照组中检测到脂质层缺失面积的增加。LDF结果分析显示,两组的神经源性和肌源性节律以及血流量变异系数都有所下降。治疗组的淋巴流量变异系数保持稳定,而对照组则趋于下降。结论——基于干涉镜和LDF方法对眼睑形态功能状态的客观仪器评估,所获得的数据分析表明,与进行眼睑按摩相比,进行MGP治疗慢性混合性睑缘炎更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Open Medical Journal
Russian Open Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Russian Open Medical Journal (RusOMJ) (ISSN 2304-3415) is an international peer reviewed open access e-journal. The website is updated quarterly with the RusOMJ’s latest original research, clinical studies, case reports, reviews, news, and comment articles. This Journal devoted to all field of medicine. All the RusOMJ’s articles are published in full on www.romj.org with open access and no limits on word counts. Our mission is to lead the debate on health and to engage, inform, and stimulate doctors, researchers, and other health professionals in ways that will improve outcomes for patients. The RusOMJ team is based mainly in Saratov (Russia), although we also have editors elsewhere in Russian and in other countries.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信