A European comparison of screening and referral by childcare professionals of maltreatment in children aged 0–3: A wild goose chase or maybe not

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Elisa Bisagno, Alessia Cadamuro, Serafine Dierickx, Dima Bou Mosleh, Zane Linde-Ozola, Annija Kandāte, Dora Varga-Sabjan, Dorottya Morva, Noemi Laszlo, Monika Rozsa, Andrea Gruber, Giovanna Laura De Fazio, Dorien Wuyts, Johanna M. C. Blom
{"title":"A European comparison of screening and referral by childcare professionals of maltreatment in children aged 0–3: A wild goose chase or maybe not","authors":"Elisa Bisagno,&nbsp;Alessia Cadamuro,&nbsp;Serafine Dierickx,&nbsp;Dima Bou Mosleh,&nbsp;Zane Linde-Ozola,&nbsp;Annija Kandāte,&nbsp;Dora Varga-Sabjan,&nbsp;Dorottya Morva,&nbsp;Noemi Laszlo,&nbsp;Monika Rozsa,&nbsp;Andrea Gruber,&nbsp;Giovanna Laura De Fazio,&nbsp;Dorien Wuyts,&nbsp;Johanna M. C. Blom","doi":"10.1002/car.2812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Framed within the European project ECLIPS (Enhancing the Capacity to combat chiLd abuse through an Integral training and Protocol for childcare professionalS), this study aims at understanding the needs related to the screening and referral of child maltreatment by childcare professionals working with children aged 0–3 in daycare settings of four European countries (Belgium, Hungary, Italy and Latvia). While children in this age group display the highest risk of abuse compared to older children, research and practice are less focused on them. Given their daily exposure, childcare professionals are in a unique position to identify and refer child maltreatment of infants and toddlers. However, data from desk research and focus groups held in the four countries revealed significant gaps in both processes. Screening for abuse is not mandatory for childcare professionals, and many barriers limit its effectiveness, such as the lack of training and the absence of standardised practices. Referral is mainly undermined by psychological barriers, namely fear and lack of self-efficacy. This is a fundamental first step to developing strategies to face underreporting and filling knowledge gaps while supporting the fundamental competencies necessary to safeguard the young child's best interest, which is the final goal of the ECLIPS project.</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Framed within the European project ECLIPS (Enhancing the Capacity to combat chiLd abuse through an Integral training and Protocol for childcare professionalS), this study aims at understanding the needs related to the screening and referral of child maltreatment by childcare professionals working with children aged 0–3 in daycare settings of four European countries (Belgium, Hungary, Italy and Latvia). While children in this age group display the highest risk of abuse compared to older children, research and practice are less focused on them. Given their daily exposure, childcare professionals are in a unique position to identify and refer child maltreatment of infants and toddlers. However, data from desk research and focus groups held in the four countries revealed significant gaps in both processes. Screening for abuse is not mandatory for childcare professionals, and many barriers limit its effectiveness, such as the lack of training and the absence of standardised practices. Referral is mainly undermined by psychological barriers, namely fear and lack of self-efficacy. This is a fundamental first step to developing strategies to face underreporting and filling knowledge gaps while supporting the fundamental competencies necessary to safeguard the young child's best interest, which is the final goal of the ECLIPS project.

欧洲儿童护理专业人员对0-3岁儿童虐待的筛查和转诊的比较:徒劳的追逐,也许不是
在欧洲ECLIPS项目(通过儿童保育专业人员的综合培训和协议提高打击虐待儿童的能力)框架内,这项研究旨在了解在四个欧洲国家(比利时、匈牙利、意大利和拉脱维亚)日托机构中从事0-3岁儿童工作的儿童保育专业人员对儿童虐待的筛查和转诊的需求。虽然与年龄较大的儿童相比,这个年龄组的儿童受到虐待的风险最高,但研究和实践对他们的关注较少。鉴于儿童看护专业人员的日常接触,他们在识别和转诊婴幼儿虐待儿童方面处于独特的地位。然而,在这四个国家进行的案头研究和焦点小组的数据显示,这两个进程存在重大差距。对儿童保育专业人员进行虐待筛查并不是强制性的,许多障碍限制了其有效性,例如缺乏培训和缺乏标准化做法。转诊主要受到心理障碍的影响,即恐惧和缺乏自我效能感。这是制定应对低报和填补知识空白的战略的基本第一步,同时支持维护幼儿最佳利益所需的基本能力,这是ECLIPS项目的最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信