Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory Teacher Training Workshops: A Kirkpatrick Model Analysis

Q1 Social Sciences
Krishnasree Achuthan, Vysakh Kani Kolil, S. N. Jyothy
{"title":"Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory Teacher Training Workshops: A Kirkpatrick Model Analysis","authors":"Krishnasree Achuthan, Vysakh Kani Kolil, S. N. Jyothy","doi":"10.3991/ijet.v18i15.40037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing laboratory experiments is an integral and unavoidable part of STEM education. The teaching efficacy of laboratory experiments can be optimized by integrating ICT-based tools into the curriculum. As teachers are the key facilitators in practical lessons, it is imperative that they adopt the latest teaching technologies, such as virtual laboratories (VLs). To achieve optimal student learning outcomes, teachers ideally undergo adequate training programs that equip them with relevant knowledge and skills to utilize VLs. As myriad training workshops and self-learning tools are available to teachers, the efficacy of training programs needs to be precisely evaluated to determine their quality and design better programs for posterity. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model is suited to evaluate teaching training, as it takes into consideration holistic aspects of learning: learners’ reactions, learning outcomes, behavior, and results. In this study, we conducted and evaluated a VL teacher training program in Africa, applying Kirkpatrick’s model analysis. Our results indicate a significant improvement in participants’ perception and attitude toward VL after attending the training. Also, the training proved to be effective in improving the learning outcomes of the participants. We found a huge hike in the number of VL users in Africa after conducting the training program, indicating the overall success of the program. It met the needs of the teachers and equipped them with the necessary skills and knowledge to utilize VLs in their teaching practices. This study may assist future trainers to design successful teacher training programs in laboratory education.","PeriodicalId":47933,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i15.40037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performing laboratory experiments is an integral and unavoidable part of STEM education. The teaching efficacy of laboratory experiments can be optimized by integrating ICT-based tools into the curriculum. As teachers are the key facilitators in practical lessons, it is imperative that they adopt the latest teaching technologies, such as virtual laboratories (VLs). To achieve optimal student learning outcomes, teachers ideally undergo adequate training programs that equip them with relevant knowledge and skills to utilize VLs. As myriad training workshops and self-learning tools are available to teachers, the efficacy of training programs needs to be precisely evaluated to determine their quality and design better programs for posterity. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model is suited to evaluate teaching training, as it takes into consideration holistic aspects of learning: learners’ reactions, learning outcomes, behavior, and results. In this study, we conducted and evaluated a VL teacher training program in Africa, applying Kirkpatrick’s model analysis. Our results indicate a significant improvement in participants’ perception and attitude toward VL after attending the training. Also, the training proved to be effective in improving the learning outcomes of the participants. We found a huge hike in the number of VL users in Africa after conducting the training program, indicating the overall success of the program. It met the needs of the teachers and equipped them with the necessary skills and knowledge to utilize VLs in their teaching practices. This study may assist future trainers to design successful teacher training programs in laboratory education.
虚拟实验室教师培训工作坊的有效性:Kirkpatrick模型分析
进行实验室实验是STEM教育不可或缺的一部分。实验室实验的教学效果可以通过将基于ICT的工具整合到课程中来优化。由于教师是实践课的关键促进者,他们必须采用最新的教学技术,如虚拟实验室。为了实现最佳的学生学习成果,教师最好接受适当的培训计划,使他们具备使用VL的相关知识和技能。由于教师可以获得无数的培训讲习班和自学工具,因此需要准确评估培训计划的有效性,以确定其质量,并为子孙后代设计更好的计划。Kirkpatrick的四级模型适用于评估教学培训,因为它考虑了学习的整体方面:学习者的反应、学习结果、行为和结果。在这项研究中,我们应用Kirkpatrick的模型分析,对非洲的VL教师培训计划进行了评估。我们的研究结果表明,参加培训后,参与者对VL的感知和态度有了显著改善。此外,培训被证明在提高参与者的学习成果方面是有效的。我们发现,在实施培训计划后,非洲的VL用户数量大幅增加,这表明该计划总体上取得了成功。它满足了教师的需求,并为他们提供了在教学实践中使用VL的必要技能和知识。这项研究可能有助于未来的培训师在实验室教育中设计成功的教师培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal focuses on the exchange of relevant trends and research results and presents practical experiences gained while developing and testing elements of technology enhanced learning. It bridges the gap between pure academic research journals and more practical publications. So it covers the full range from research, application development to experience reports and product descriptions. Fields of interest include, but are not limited to: -Software / Distributed Systems -Knowledge Management -Semantic Web -MashUp Technologies -Platforms and Content Authoring -New Learning Models and Applications -Pedagogical and Psychological Issues -Trust / Security -Internet Applications -Networked Tools -Mobile / wireless -Electronics -Visualisation -Bio- / Neuroinformatics -Language /Speech -Collaboration Tools / Collaborative Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信