Effects Of Field Independence, Metacognitive Knowledge, And Vocabulary Knowledge On Second Language Listening Comprehension

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Satori
{"title":"Effects Of Field Independence, Metacognitive Knowledge, And Vocabulary Knowledge On Second Language Listening Comprehension","authors":"M. Satori","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2022.2056037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of linguistic knowledge (vocabulary knowledge) and cognitive abilities (metacognitive knowledge and cognitive styles) on the second language (L2) listening comprehension at different proficiency levels. The study has also sought to investigate whether or not cognitive abilities and L2 linguistic knowledge are distinct cognitive factors that can influence L2 listening comprehension. The participants were 106 EFL learners drawn from six English classes at a Japanese university. During the data collection phase, all participants administered the L2 listening comprehension test, Listening Vocabulary Level Test, Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire, and modified Group Embedded Figures Test. The results of the correlational analyses and regression analyses demonstrate that two cognitive variables, namely, metacognitive knowledge and cognitive style, have a direct impact on L2 listening comprehension, independently of vocabulary knowledge; their contribution to L2 listening test performance is affected by listeners’ proficiency and the listening tasks’ characteristics. These findings provide evidence for the significant and independent role of field independence and metacognitive knowledge in L2 listening comprehension as an essential construct of cognitive abilities.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":"36 1","pages":"254 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2022.2056037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of linguistic knowledge (vocabulary knowledge) and cognitive abilities (metacognitive knowledge and cognitive styles) on the second language (L2) listening comprehension at different proficiency levels. The study has also sought to investigate whether or not cognitive abilities and L2 linguistic knowledge are distinct cognitive factors that can influence L2 listening comprehension. The participants were 106 EFL learners drawn from six English classes at a Japanese university. During the data collection phase, all participants administered the L2 listening comprehension test, Listening Vocabulary Level Test, Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire, and modified Group Embedded Figures Test. The results of the correlational analyses and regression analyses demonstrate that two cognitive variables, namely, metacognitive knowledge and cognitive style, have a direct impact on L2 listening comprehension, independently of vocabulary knowledge; their contribution to L2 listening test performance is affected by listeners’ proficiency and the listening tasks’ characteristics. These findings provide evidence for the significant and independent role of field independence and metacognitive knowledge in L2 listening comprehension as an essential construct of cognitive abilities.
场独立性、元认知知识和词汇知识对二语听力理解的影响
摘要本研究考察了不同水平的语言知识(词汇知识)和认知能力(元认知知识和认知风格)对第二语言听力理解的影响。本研究还试图探讨认知能力和二语语言知识是否是影响二语听力理解的不同认知因素。参与者是来自日本一所大学六个英语班的106名英语学习者。在数据收集阶段,所有参与者都进行了二语听力理解测试、听力词汇水平测试、元认知意识听力问卷和改进的团体嵌入图形测试。相关分析和回归分析结果表明,元认知知识和认知风格这两个认知变量独立于词汇知识,直接影响二语听力理解;他们对二语听力测试成绩的贡献受听众的熟练程度和听力任务特点的影响。这些发现为场独立性和元认知知识在二语听力理解中作为认知能力的重要组成部分所起的重要和独立作用提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信