Mohd Afandi P. Mohammed , Mohd Noriznan Mokhtar , Minato Wakisaka
{"title":"A viscoelastic cohesive zone model for starch-gluten interface to simulate dough deformation","authors":"Mohd Afandi P. Mohammed , Mohd Noriznan Mokhtar , Minato Wakisaka","doi":"10.1016/j.foostr.2022.100306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A viscoelastic cohesive zone model was proposed to simulate rate-dependent starch-gluten interface debonding. The debonding was believed to influence stress-strain curves of tensile and shear tests at different strain rates. The model was written as a user-defined finite element subroutine codes, which was then included into an interface element geometry between starch filler and gluten matrix. The finite element modelling results showed agreement with experimental data under uniaxial tension and simple shear at different strain rates (5/min and 0.5/min). This was due to the viscoelastic effect of the interface model, which caused difference between traction initiation at different rates for the cohesive zone model (i.e. ∼1.1kPa and ∼0.5kPa at 5/min and 0.5/min, respectively). In addition, it was shown that critical shear stress is a very important debonding parameter, where slight changes of the shear traction values caused the model stress-strain curve to deviate from the experimental results. Simulations of starch-gluten dough deformation were then conducted at different strain rates to imitate dough processes like baking, extrusion and proving (0.003/s, 1/s and 10/s, respectively). The interface model was shown to influence stress-strain curve at lower strain rate processes like baking and extrusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48640,"journal":{"name":"Food Structure-Netherlands","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100306"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Structure-Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213329122000557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A viscoelastic cohesive zone model was proposed to simulate rate-dependent starch-gluten interface debonding. The debonding was believed to influence stress-strain curves of tensile and shear tests at different strain rates. The model was written as a user-defined finite element subroutine codes, which was then included into an interface element geometry between starch filler and gluten matrix. The finite element modelling results showed agreement with experimental data under uniaxial tension and simple shear at different strain rates (5/min and 0.5/min). This was due to the viscoelastic effect of the interface model, which caused difference between traction initiation at different rates for the cohesive zone model (i.e. ∼1.1kPa and ∼0.5kPa at 5/min and 0.5/min, respectively). In addition, it was shown that critical shear stress is a very important debonding parameter, where slight changes of the shear traction values caused the model stress-strain curve to deviate from the experimental results. Simulations of starch-gluten dough deformation were then conducted at different strain rates to imitate dough processes like baking, extrusion and proving (0.003/s, 1/s and 10/s, respectively). The interface model was shown to influence stress-strain curve at lower strain rate processes like baking and extrusion.
期刊介绍:
Food Structure is the premier international forum devoted to the publication of high-quality original research on food structure. The focus of this journal is on food structure in the context of its relationship with molecular composition, processing and macroscopic properties (e.g., shelf stability, sensory properties, etc.). Manuscripts that only report qualitative findings and micrographs and that lack sound hypothesis-driven, quantitative structure-function research are not accepted. Significance of the research findings for the food science community and/or industry must also be highlighted.