Use of optical coherence tomography otoscopy to overcome cerumen and other view obstructions during ear examination and assessment

Ryan G. Porter, Ryan M. Nolan, Michael Novak, Jon Youakim, Ryan L. Shelton
{"title":"Use of optical coherence tomography otoscopy to overcome cerumen and other view obstructions during ear examination and assessment","authors":"Ryan G. Porter, Ryan M. Nolan, Michael Novak, Jon Youakim, Ryan L. Shelton","doi":"10.1002/tbio.202200017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Childhood ear infections are highly prevalent and diagnosed with the otoscope, a simple tool that illuminates and magnifies the eardrum to subjectively assess color, translucency and presence of any middle ear fluid. Frequently, however, this view is obstructed by cerumen, complicating clinician assessment and appropriate and effective management. An optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐otoscope capable of capturing both depth‐resolved OCT images and digital color surface images was used to compare OCT against otoscopy for imageability and readability despite cerumen obstruction. Image data were collected from 26 human subjects and read by 12 blinded clinicians and 5 blinded OCT experts. An average of 64.6% of otoscopy views were obstructed. For cases with >75% otoscopy view obstruction, OCT imageability was 84.6%, while otoscopy imageability was 37.5%, excluding complete obstruction cases. OCT‐otoscopy is a promising technology to improve practical middle ear assessment despite the presence of obstructions that frequently render current diagnostic assessments ineffective.","PeriodicalId":75242,"journal":{"name":"Translational biophotonics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational biophotonics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tbio.202200017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Childhood ear infections are highly prevalent and diagnosed with the otoscope, a simple tool that illuminates and magnifies the eardrum to subjectively assess color, translucency and presence of any middle ear fluid. Frequently, however, this view is obstructed by cerumen, complicating clinician assessment and appropriate and effective management. An optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐otoscope capable of capturing both depth‐resolved OCT images and digital color surface images was used to compare OCT against otoscopy for imageability and readability despite cerumen obstruction. Image data were collected from 26 human subjects and read by 12 blinded clinicians and 5 blinded OCT experts. An average of 64.6% of otoscopy views were obstructed. For cases with >75% otoscopy view obstruction, OCT imageability was 84.6%, while otoscopy imageability was 37.5%, excluding complete obstruction cases. OCT‐otoscopy is a promising technology to improve practical middle ear assessment despite the presence of obstructions that frequently render current diagnostic assessments ineffective.
在耳朵检查和评估过程中使用光学相干断层扫描耳镜来克服耳垢和其他视野障碍
儿童耳部感染非常普遍,并通过耳镜进行诊断,耳镜是一种简单的工具,可以照亮和放大鼓膜,主观评估颜色、半透明性和是否存在中耳液。然而,这一观点经常受到cerumen的阻碍,使临床医生的评估和适当有效的管理变得复杂。使用能够捕获深度分辨OCT图像和数字彩色表面图像的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)耳镜,将OCT与耳镜检查进行比较,以确定在有耳垢阻塞的情况下的成像能力和可读性。图像数据收集自26名受试者,由12名盲法临床医生和5名盲法OCT专家读取。平均64.6%的耳镜检查视野被遮挡。对于耳镜检查视野梗阻>75%的病例,OCT成像能力为84.6%,而耳镜检查成像能力为37.5%,不包括完全梗阻病例。OCT耳镜检查是一种很有前途的技术,可以改善实际的中耳评估,尽管存在经常使当前诊断评估无效的障碍物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信