LA COMUNICACIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO PROPIO EN TESIS: VARIACIÓN ENTRE GRADOS ACADÉMICOS EN LA SECCIÓN DESARROLLO TEÓRICO

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Paulina Meza, Bárbara Rivera
{"title":"LA COMUNICACIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO PROPIO EN TESIS: VARIACIÓN ENTRE GRADOS ACADÉMICOS EN LA SECCIÓN DESARROLLO TEÓRICO","authors":"Paulina Meza, Bárbara Rivera","doi":"10.4067/S0718-48832018000100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regardless area or academic degree, students communicate discipline knowledge through two sources in their Thesis. On one side, students demonstrate their capability to contribute in the construction of disciplinary knowledge (One’s Knowledge). On the other side, students recognize others author ́s contribution in the discipline (Knowledge of Others). In the context of a qualitative study, we determined the discourse resources used in the communication of One’s Knowledge in the Theoretical Framework section of Bachelors, Masters and PhD Thesis within the discipline of Linguistic. We analyzed a corpus of 36 Thesis using our own categories, validated through expert judgment. Results show a series of differences between degrees considering frequency and variety of discourse sources; PhD students use the widest variety of One ́s Knowledge discourse resources in their Thesis. This phenomenon could be explained by a higher level of knowledge, insertion and consolidation among doctorate students. In conclusion, the present research is a valuable input of empirical evidence for an overlooked section in Thesis genre analysis, and for the discipline of Linguistic. Moreover, the generation of granular level and high specialized evidence furthers the understanding of the discursive construction of disciplinary knowledge, and could assist facilitators and students while writing their Thesis.","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4067/S0718-48832018000100115","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000100115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Regardless area or academic degree, students communicate discipline knowledge through two sources in their Thesis. On one side, students demonstrate their capability to contribute in the construction of disciplinary knowledge (One’s Knowledge). On the other side, students recognize others author ́s contribution in the discipline (Knowledge of Others). In the context of a qualitative study, we determined the discourse resources used in the communication of One’s Knowledge in the Theoretical Framework section of Bachelors, Masters and PhD Thesis within the discipline of Linguistic. We analyzed a corpus of 36 Thesis using our own categories, validated through expert judgment. Results show a series of differences between degrees considering frequency and variety of discourse sources; PhD students use the widest variety of One ́s Knowledge discourse resources in their Thesis. This phenomenon could be explained by a higher level of knowledge, insertion and consolidation among doctorate students. In conclusion, the present research is a valuable input of empirical evidence for an overlooked section in Thesis genre analysis, and for the discipline of Linguistic. Moreover, the generation of granular level and high specialized evidence furthers the understanding of the discursive construction of disciplinary knowledge, and could assist facilitators and students while writing their Thesis.
论文中自我知识的交流:理论发展部分学位之间的差异
无论是地区还是学位,学生在论文中都通过两个来源交流学科知识。一方面,学生展示了他们在学科知识(个人知识)建设中做出贡献的能力。另一方面,学生认可其他作者在学科(他人知识)中的贡献。在定性研究的背景下,我们在语言学学科的学士、硕士和博士论文的理论框架部分确定了用于知识交流的话语资源。我们使用自己的类别分析了36篇论文的语料库,并通过专家判断进行了验证。结果表明,考虑话语频率和话语来源多样性的程度存在一系列差异;博士生在论文中使用了最广泛的一种知识话语资源。这一现象可以用博士生更高水平的知识、插入和巩固来解释。总之,本研究为论文体裁分析中被忽视的部分和语言学学科提供了宝贵的经验证据。此外,细粒度和高度专业化的证据的产生进一步加深了对学科知识话语结构的理解,并可以在撰写论文时帮助主持人和学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RLA
RLA Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信