Comparison of Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Specimens

Uwizeyimana Jean Damascene, Kim Min-kyung, Kim Dae-won, Byun Jung-Hyun, Yong Dong-Eun
{"title":"Comparison of Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Specimens","authors":"Uwizeyimana Jean Damascene, Kim Min-kyung, Kim Dae-won, Byun Jung-Hyun, Yong Dong-Eun","doi":"10.5145/ACM.2019.22.2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Respiratory tract infections are major public health threats, and the identification of their causative microbes helps clinicians to initiate timely and appropriate antimicrobial therapy and prevent the secondary spread of infection. The main goal of this study was to compare two multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays used to detect respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: Between September and October 2017, a total of 84 nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained consecutively from patients in a tertiary hospital using a flocked swab with 3 mL universal transport medium (COPAN Diagnostics, USA). A total of 64 positive and 20 negative sample results from the LG AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR kit (LG Life Sciences, Korea) were further retested using a new AdvanSure RV-plus a real-time RT-PCR kit to compare their performance. Results: Statistical analysis of positive and negative agreement between the two different kits was conducted between the newly introduced AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR kit and the AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR. The overall agreement was 96.4%, with positive agreement of 98.4% and negative agreement of 90%. The evaluated sensitivity and specificity of AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR were 96.9% and 94.7%, respectively, with a kappa value of 0.9 ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The performances of LG AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR and the new AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR kit showed strong overall agreement. AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR had a better detection rate and could detect coronavirus 229E and enterovirus, especially with a high detection rate in coinfection. AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR can be considered a useful tool for respiratory virus diagnosis in clinical laboratories. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:35-41)","PeriodicalId":34065,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5145/ACM.2019.22.2.35","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/ACM.2019.22.2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Respiratory tract infections are major public health threats, and the identification of their causative microbes helps clinicians to initiate timely and appropriate antimicrobial therapy and prevent the secondary spread of infection. The main goal of this study was to compare two multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays used to detect respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: Between September and October 2017, a total of 84 nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained consecutively from patients in a tertiary hospital using a flocked swab with 3 mL universal transport medium (COPAN Diagnostics, USA). A total of 64 positive and 20 negative sample results from the LG AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR kit (LG Life Sciences, Korea) were further retested using a new AdvanSure RV-plus a real-time RT-PCR kit to compare their performance. Results: Statistical analysis of positive and negative agreement between the two different kits was conducted between the newly introduced AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR kit and the AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR. The overall agreement was 96.4%, with positive agreement of 98.4% and negative agreement of 90%. The evaluated sensitivity and specificity of AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR were 96.9% and 94.7%, respectively, with a kappa value of 0.9 ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The performances of LG AdvanSure RV real-time RT-PCR and the new AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR kit showed strong overall agreement. AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR had a better detection rate and could detect coronavirus 229E and enterovirus, especially with a high detection rate in coinfection. AdvanSure RV-plus real-time RT-PCR can be considered a useful tool for respiratory virus diagnosis in clinical laboratories. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:35-41)
多重实时聚合酶链反应法检测鼻咽标本中呼吸道病毒的比较
背景:呼吸道感染是主要的公共卫生威胁,识别其致病微生物有助于临床医生及时、适当地进行抗菌治疗,防止感染的二次传播。本研究的主要目的是比较两种用于检测鼻咽拭子标本中呼吸道病毒病原体的多重实时聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测方法。方法:在2017年9月至10月期间,使用3 mL通用输送介质(美国COPAN Diagnostics)的植绒拭子从一家三级医院的患者身上连续获得84份鼻咽标本。LG AdvanSure RV实时RT-PCR试剂盒(LG Life Sciences,Korea)的总共64个阳性和20个阴性样本结果使用新的AdvanSure RV加上实时RT-PCR试剂箱进行了进一步的重新测试,以比较它们的性能。结果:对新引进的AdvanSure RV plus实时RT-PCR试剂盒和AdvanSure RV实时RT-PCR两种不同试剂盒之间的阳性和阴性一致性进行了统计分析。总体一致性为96.4%,阳性一致性为98.4%,阴性一致性为90%。AdvanSure RV加实时RT-PCR的敏感性和特异性分别为96.9%和94.7%,kappa值为0.9(P<0.001)。AdvanSure RV加实时RT-PCR具有更好的检测率,可以检测冠状病毒229E和肠道病毒,尤其是在合并感染中具有较高的检测率。AdvanSure RV加上实时RT-PCR可以被认为是临床实验室诊断呼吸道病毒的有用工具。(Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:35-41)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信