David vs. Goliath: transnational grassroots outreach and empirical evidence from the #HongKongProtests Twitter network

Q3 Social Sciences
Cheryl S. Y. Shea, Yanru Jiang, Wendy L. Y. Leung
{"title":"David vs. Goliath: transnational grassroots outreach and empirical evidence from the #HongKongProtests Twitter network","authors":"Cheryl S. Y. Shea, Yanru Jiang, Wendy L. Y. Leung","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2106793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study analyzes the digital transnational advocacy network of the 2019 Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (Anti-ELAB) movement on Twitter. We present how grassroots users strategically utilize social media for achieving diplomatic engagement with foreign actors. The Twitter network analysis and natural language processing of tweets (N = 88,800) identify the key opinion leaders and their three core grassroots frames: universal values, humanitarian concerns, and geopolitics. We find that the low threshold of Twitter participation provides additional direct channels for ordinary users to engage with foreign politicians and create their own public opinion wave. The Anti-ELAB digital transnational grassroots advocacy network was found to have more high-profile actors, such as corporations and celebrities, due to pressure from grassroots users to stand with them. Though the two traditional frames, universal values and humanitarian concerns, adopted from the organizational-centered outreach remain prevalent, grassroots users extend geopolitical frames to incorporate their cultural capital and economic power.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"22 1","pages":"193 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2106793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the digital transnational advocacy network of the 2019 Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (Anti-ELAB) movement on Twitter. We present how grassroots users strategically utilize social media for achieving diplomatic engagement with foreign actors. The Twitter network analysis and natural language processing of tweets (N = 88,800) identify the key opinion leaders and their three core grassroots frames: universal values, humanitarian concerns, and geopolitics. We find that the low threshold of Twitter participation provides additional direct channels for ordinary users to engage with foreign politicians and create their own public opinion wave. The Anti-ELAB digital transnational grassroots advocacy network was found to have more high-profile actors, such as corporations and celebrities, due to pressure from grassroots users to stand with them. Though the two traditional frames, universal values and humanitarian concerns, adopted from the organizational-centered outreach remain prevalent, grassroots users extend geopolitical frames to incorporate their cultural capital and economic power.
大卫与歌利亚:跨国草根外联和来自#香港抗议推特网络的经验证据
本研究分析了推特上2019年《香港反引渡法修正案》(Anti-ELAB)运动的数字跨国倡导网络。我们展示了草根用户如何战略性地利用社交媒体实现与外国行动者的外交接触。Twitter网络分析和对tweet (N = 88,800)的自然语言处理确定了关键意见领袖及其三个核心基层框架:普遍价值观、人道主义关切和地缘政治。我们发现,Twitter的低参与门槛为普通用户与外国政客接触并创造自己的民意浪潮提供了额外的直接渠道。反elab数字跨国草根倡导网络被发现有更多的高调参与者,如企业和名人,因为草根用户的压力,要求他们站在他们一边。尽管以组织为中心的外联所采用的两种传统框架,即普遍价值观和人道主义关切仍然普遍存在,但基层用户扩展了地缘政治框架,以融入他们的文化资本和经济力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Communication
Review of Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信