Examination of Contextual Variables Across and Within Different Types of Placement for Elementary Students With Complex Support Needs

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
L. Jackson, M. Agran, Kirsten R. Lansey, D. Baker, Somer Matthews, Heather Fitzpatrick, Matt Jameson, Diane L. Ryndak, Kristin K. Burnette, Debbie Taub
{"title":"Examination of Contextual Variables Across and Within Different Types of Placement for Elementary Students With Complex Support Needs","authors":"L. Jackson, M. Agran, Kirsten R. Lansey, D. Baker, Somer Matthews, Heather Fitzpatrick, Matt Jameson, Diane L. Ryndak, Kristin K. Burnette, Debbie Taub","doi":"10.1177/15407969221132248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has begun to identify the breadth and complexity of contextual variables that impact the opportunities, services, and supports students with complex support needs receive across different classroom placements. Indeed, as research has suggested, placement in and of itself may determine the schooling experiences of these students in ways that can enhance or constrain the outcomes of the educational process. This study examined an array of contextual variables in relation to four types of placement in which students with complex support needs might be placed for educational services by their Individualized Education Program teams. Placements were defined in terms of percent of the school day students had access to age-level general education classes, ranging between no access (separate school) to 80% or higher (“inclusive”). The investigation used surveys completed by a national sample of special and general educators and administrators. Completed surveys were obtained for 117 students with complex support needs across all four types of placement. The findings revealed potential relationships between a number of contextual variables and placement, suggesting that: (a) student opportunities and experiences vary systematically in relation to the amount of access they have to general education classrooms and (b) the application of the Least Restrictive Environment process, with its tacit endorsement of segregated settings and specialized programs, may in fact negatively impact the education of many of these students. Implications of these findings and future research needs are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":"47 1","pages":"191 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221132248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research has begun to identify the breadth and complexity of contextual variables that impact the opportunities, services, and supports students with complex support needs receive across different classroom placements. Indeed, as research has suggested, placement in and of itself may determine the schooling experiences of these students in ways that can enhance or constrain the outcomes of the educational process. This study examined an array of contextual variables in relation to four types of placement in which students with complex support needs might be placed for educational services by their Individualized Education Program teams. Placements were defined in terms of percent of the school day students had access to age-level general education classes, ranging between no access (separate school) to 80% or higher (“inclusive”). The investigation used surveys completed by a national sample of special and general educators and administrators. Completed surveys were obtained for 117 students with complex support needs across all four types of placement. The findings revealed potential relationships between a number of contextual variables and placement, suggesting that: (a) student opportunities and experiences vary systematically in relation to the amount of access they have to general education classrooms and (b) the application of the Least Restrictive Environment process, with its tacit endorsement of segregated settings and specialized programs, may in fact negatively impact the education of many of these students. Implications of these findings and future research needs are discussed.
对有复杂支持需求的小学生不同类型安置中的情境变量的检验
研究已经开始确定影响机会、服务和支持有复杂支持需求的学生在不同教室接受的背景变量的广度和复杂性。事实上,正如研究表明的那样,位置本身可能会以增强或限制教育过程结果的方式决定这些学生的上学经历。本研究考察了与四种安置类型相关的一系列背景变量,在四种安置类型中,有复杂支持需求的学生可能被他们的个性化教育计划团队安置为教育服务。安置是根据有机会上同年龄水平的通识教育课程的走读学生的百分比来定义的,范围从没有机会(单独的学校)到80%或更高(“包容性”)。该调查采用了由全国特殊和普通教育工作者和行政人员抽样完成的调查。在所有四种类型的安置中,对117名有复杂支持需求的学生进行了完整的调查。研究结果揭示了一些环境变量和安置之间的潜在关系,表明:(a)学生的机会和经历与他们进入普通教育教室的数量有系统的差异;(b)最少限制环境过程的应用,其默认的隔离设置和专业课程,实际上可能对许多这些学生的教育产生负面影响。讨论了这些发现的意义和未来的研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信